CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interference between independent photonic integrated devices for quantum key distribution

Semenenko, Henry, Sibson, Philip, Thompson, Mark G., Erven, Chris·2019·Optics Letters
DOI 10.1364/ol.44.000275
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.44.000275

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrated quantum random number generators have been demonstrated based on various non-deterministic quantum processes, e.g., phase fluctuation, vacuum fluctuation, and non-locality.

    “Integrated QRNGs have been demonstrated based on various non-deterministic quantum process, e.g., phase fluctuation [38, 74], vacuum fluctuation [75], and non-locality [44].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Experiment and Results sections describe interference between integrated transmitters for quantum key distribution, not an integrated quantum random number generator. A search for QRNGs, phase-fluctuation-based randomness, and random phase fluctuations found no passage in our copy supporting the claim attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Shor, 1994, 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS), 124, 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bennett, 1985, IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, 175
  3. Ekert, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 661, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lo, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 595, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.149 · DOI
  5. Lamas-Linares, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 9388, 10.1364/OE.15.009388 · DOI
  6. Gisin, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 73, 022320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022320 · DOI
  7. Lydersen, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 686, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Zhao, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 042333, 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Makarov, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 74, 022313, 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
  10. Lo, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 130503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  11. Xu, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 113007, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113007 · DOI
  12. Rarity, 2005, J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 7, S171, 10.1088/1464-4266/7/7/007 · DOI
  13. Wang, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 012320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012320 · DOI
  14. Smit, 2014, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 29, 083001, 10.1088/0268-1242/29/8/083001 · DOI
  15. Sibson, 2017, Nat. Commun., 8, 13984, 10.1038/ncomms13984 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lo, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230504, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Yuan, 2014, Phys. Rev. Appl., 2, 064006, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.064006 · DOI
  18. Rubenok, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  19. Comandar, 2016, Nat. Photonics, 10, 312, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.50 · DOI
  20. Ismail, 2016, Opt. Express, 24, 16366, 10.1364/OE.24.016366 · DOI
  21. Akhlaghi, 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 8233, 10.1038/ncomms9233 · DOI · Paper page
  22. AgnesiBacco, 2019, Opt. Lett., 44, 271, 10.1364/OL.44.000271 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Semenenko, H., Sibson, P., Thompson, M. G., & Erven, C.
Venue
Optics Letters
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2019-01-08
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
275
ISSN
  • 0146-9592
  • 1539-4794
DOI
10.1364/ol.44.000275
Cited by
30
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/K033085/1, EP/L015730/, EP/L024020/1, EP/M013472/1)
  • H2020 European Research Council (ERC) (2014-STG 640079, 731473)
  • QuantERA ERA-NET SQUARE project

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review