CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hong–Ou–Mandel interference between independent III–V on silicon waveguide integrated lasers

Agnesi, C., Da Lio, B., Cozzolino, D., Cardi, L., Ben Bakir, B., Hassan, K., Della Frera, A., Ruggeri, A., Giudice, A., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P., Tosi, A., Rottwitt, K., Ding, Y., Bacco, D.·2019·Optics Letters
DOI 10.1364/ol.44.000271
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.44.000271

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A rudimentary version of Shor's factoring algorithm using two CNOT gates allowed the factorisation of 15 with a fidelity of 99±1%.

    “These initial demonstrations implemented a unheralded CNOT scheme that does not include the ancillary photons, nevertheless it was possible to demonstrate a rudimentary version of Shor's factoring algorithm using two CNOT gates ( Fig.4a ) [76]. It allows the factorisation of 15 with a fidelity of 99±1%.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [76]

  • A compiled version of Shor's factoring algorithm was performed in a SiO2 chip that consists of 2 CZ gates and 6 Hadamard gates.

    “a compiled version of Shor's factoring algorithm is performed in a SiO2 chip that consists of 2 CZ gates and 6 Hadamard gates.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Sibson, 2017, Optica, 4, 172, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000172 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Jalali, 2006, J. Lightwave Technol., 24, 4600, 10.1109/JLT.2006.885782 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wang, 2018, Science, 360, 285, 10.1126/science.aar7053 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ding, 2017, npj Quantum Inf., 3, 25, 10.1038/s41534-017-0026-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Raffaelli, 2018, Quantum Sci. Technol., 3, 025003, 10.1088/2058-9565/aaa38f · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wang, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  7. Lo, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230504, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kaspar, 2014, Proc. SPIE, 9133, 913302, 10.1117/12.2052999 · DOI
  9. Cristofori, 2017, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 29, 960, 10.1109/LPT.2017.2700497 · DOI
  10. Wang, 2018, APL Photonics, 3, 106104, 10.1063/1.5040118 · DOI
  11. Sibson, 2017, Nat. Commun., 8, 13984, 10.1038/ncomms13984 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lydersen, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 686, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Braunstein, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 130502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lo, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 130503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  15. Inamori, 2002, Algorithmica, 34, 340, 10.1007/s00453-002-0983-4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Yin, 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 190501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.190501 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Xu, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 113007, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113007 · DOI
  18. Lyons, 2018, Sci. Adv., 4, eaap9416, 10.1126/sciadv.aap9416 · DOI
  19. Valivarthi, 2016, Nat. Photonics, 10, 676, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.180 · DOI
  20. Moschandreou, 2018, J. Lightwave Technol., 36, 3752, 10.1109/JLT.2018.2850282 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Duan, 2014, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 20, 158, 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2296752 · DOI
  22. Duprez, 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 8489, 10.1364/OE.23.008489 · DOI
  23. Kobayashi, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 90, 032320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032320 · DOI
  24. Welford, 1985, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 21, 1749, 10.1109/JQE.1985.1072584 · DOI
  25. Yuan, 2014, Phys. Rev. Appl., 2, 064006, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.064006 · DOI
  26. Tosi, 2012, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 83, 013104, 10.1063/1.3675579 · DOI
  27. Aragoneses, 2018, Opt. Lett., 43, 3806, 10.1364/OL.43.003806 · DOI
  28. Rubenok, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  29. Tang, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 190503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.190503 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Piekarek, 2017, Opt. Lett., 42, 815, 10.1364/OL.42.000815 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Szelag, 2017, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 24.1.1, 10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268450 · DOI
  32. Bennett, 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci., 560, 7, 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Arrazola, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 062305, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.062305 · DOI
  34. Touchette, 2018, Phys. Rev. A, 97, 042320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.042320 · DOI
  35. Oi, 2017, EPJ Quantum Technol., 4, 6, 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-017-0060-1 · DOI
  36. Agnesi, 2018, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 376, 20170461, 10.1098/rsta.2017.0461 · DOI
  37. Bunandar, 2018, Phys. Rev. X, 8, 021009
  38. Semenenko, 2019, Opt. Lett., 44, 275, 10.1364/OL.44.000275 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agnesi, C., Da Lio, B., Cozzolino, D., Cardi, L., Ben Bakir, B., Hassan, K., Della Frera, A., Ruggeri, A., Giudice, A., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P., Tosi, A., Rottwitt, K., Ding, Y., & Bacco, D.
ORCID
Venue
Optics Letters
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2019-01-08
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
271
ISSN
  • 0146-9592
  • 1539-4794
DOI
10.1364/ol.44.000271
Cited by
42
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review