CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chip-based array of near-identical, pure, heralded single-photon sources

Spring, Justin B., Mennea, Paolo L., Metcalf, Benjamin J., Humphreys, Peter C., Gates, James C., Rogers, Helen L., Söller, Christoph, Smith, Brian J., Kolthammer, W. Steven, Smith, Peter G. R., Walmsley, Ian A.·2017·Optica
DOI 10.1364/optica.4.000090
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.4.000090

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiplexing in time and spatial domains can improve the nondeterministic production of photons from parametric single-photon sources.

    “This can be improved by exploiting the multiplexing technique, such as in time [49] and spatial [50] domains.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [50]

  • Processing significantly larger numbers of photons will likely rely on the continuous development of multiplexed parametric SPSs and de-multiplexed QD-SPSs.

    “However, processing significantly larger numbers of photons will likely rely on the continuous development of multiplexed parametric SPSs [49, 50] and de-multiplexed QD-SPSs [56, 57].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. U’Ren, 2003, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 361, 1493, 10.1098/rsta.2003.1216 · DOI
  2. Zukowski, 1995, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 755, 91, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38959.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Walmsley, 2005, Science, 307, 1733, 10.1126/science.1107451 · DOI
  4. Calkins, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 22657, 10.1364/OE.21.022657 · DOI
  5. Metcalf, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 770, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.217 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Heshami, 2016, J. Modern Opt., 63, 2005, 10.1080/09500340.2016.1148212 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Eisaman, 2011, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 82, 071101, 10.1063/1.3610677 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Migdall, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 053805, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.053805 · DOI
  9. Yao, 2012, Nature, 482, 489, 10.1038/nature10770 · DOI
  10. Lu, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 91, 10.1038/nphys507 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Yao, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 225, 10.1038/nphoton.2011.354 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Metcalf, 2013, Nat. Commun., 4, 1356, 10.1038/ncomms2349 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Spring, 2013, Science, 339, 798, 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Spagnolo, 2013, Nat. Commun., 4, 1606, 10.1038/ncomms2616 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Spring, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 13522, 10.1364/OE.21.013522 · DOI
  16. Harris, 2014, Phys. Rev. X, 4, 1
  17. Meany, 2014, Laser Photon. Rev., 8, L42, 10.1002/lpor.201400027 · DOI
  18. Silverstone, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 104, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.339 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Aboussouan, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 021801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.021801 · DOI
  20. Xiong, 2011, Appl. Phys. Lett., 98, 051101, 10.1063/1.3549744 · DOI
  21. Smith, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 23589, 10.1364/OE.17.023589 · DOI
  22. Datta, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 063836, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.063836 · DOI
  23. Lucamarini, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 032325, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032325 · DOI
  24. Lepert, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 24933, 10.1364/OE.19.024933 · DOI
  25. Shapiro, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 2698, 10.1364/OL.32.002698 · DOI
  26. Tichy, 2014, J. Phys. B, 47, 103001, 10.1088/0953-4075/47/10/103001 · DOI
  27. Ra, 2013, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 1227, 10.1073/pnas.1206910110 · DOI
  28. Tichy, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 220405, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.220405 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tichy, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 020502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Tichy, 2015, Phys. Rev. A, 91, 022316, 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022316 · DOI
  31. Jin, 2014, Sci. Rep., 4, 7468, 10.1038/srep07468 · DOI
  32. Ngah, 2015, Laser Photon. Rev., 9, L1, 10.1002/lpor.201400404 · DOI
  33. Gisin, 2007, Nat. Photonics, 1, 165, 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 · DOI
  34. Lund, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 100502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502 · DOI
  35. Bentivegna, 2015, Sci. Adv., 1, e1400255, 10.1126/sciadv.1400255 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spring, J. B., Mennea, P. L., Metcalf, B. J., Humphreys, P. C., Gates, J. C., Rogers, H. L., Söller, C., Smith, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., Smith, P. G. R., & Walmsley, I. A.
Venue
Optica
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2017-01-11
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
90
ISSN
2334-2536
DOI
10.1364/optica.4.000090
Cited by
105
References
6
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/J008052/1, EP/K034480/1, EP/M013243/1)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (AFOSR EOARD; FA8655-09-1-3020)
  • EC Marie Curie Fellowship (PIEF-GA-2012-331859)
  • Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT)
  • Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford
  • European Research Council (ERC) (MOQUACINO)
  • Horizon 2020 (641039)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review