Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated sources of entangled photons at the telecom wavelength in femtosecond-laser-written circuits

Atzeni, Simone, Rab, Adil S., Corrielli, Giacomo, Polino, Emanuele, Valeri, Mauro, Mataloni, Paolo, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Crespi, Andrea, Sciarrino, Fabio, Osellame, Roberto·2018·Optica

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.5.000311

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments have shown the capability to introduce active reconfigurable elements, allowing fabrication of multi-purpose devices.

    “Furthermore, recent developments have shown the capability to introduce active reconfigurable elements, thus allowing the fabrication of multi-purpose devices [122,227,231].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [227]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. De Riedmatten, 2005, Phys. Rev. A, 71, 050302, 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.050302 · DOI
  2. Akopian, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130501 · DOI
  3. Autebert, 2016, Optica, 3, 143, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000143 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Spring, 2013, Science, 339, 798, 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Tillmann, 2013, Nat. Photonics, 7, 540, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kruse, 2015, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 053841, 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053841 · DOI
  7. Setzpfandt, 2016, Laser Photon. Rev., 10, 131, 10.1002/lpor.201500216 · DOI
  8. Kaiser, 2013, Laser Phys. Lett., 10, 045202, 10.1088/1612-2011/10/4/045202 · DOI
  9. Herrmann, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 27981, 10.1364/OE.21.027981 · DOI
  10. Martin, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 103005, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103005 · DOI
  11. Sansoni, 2017, npj Quantum Inf., 3, 5, 10.1038/s41534-016-0005-z · DOI · Paper page
  12. Orieux, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 160502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.160502 · DOI
  13. Horn, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 2314, 10.1038/srep02314 · DOI
  14. Matsuda, 2012, Sci. Rep., 2, 817, 10.1038/srep00817 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jin, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 103601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.103601 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Meany, 2014, Laser Photon. Rev., 8, L42, 10.1002/lpor.201400027 · DOI
  17. Vergyris, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 35975, 10.1038/srep35975 · DOI
  18. Ciampini, 2016, Light Sci. Appl., 5, e16064, 10.1038/lsa.2016.64 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atzeni, S., Rab, A. S., Corrielli, G., Polino, E., Valeri, M., Mataloni, P., Spagnolo, N., Crespi, A., Sciarrino, F., & Osellame, R.
Venue
Optica
Published
2018-03-20
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
311
ISSN
2334-2536
Cited by
83
References
11
Language
en
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (ERC) (742745)
  • H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) (641039)
  • FP7 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) (608062)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review