Cited by 82Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Managing antidepressant discontinuation: a systematic review

Open access
Maund, Emma, Stuart, Beth, Moore, Michael, Dowrick, Christopher, Geraghty, Adam W.A., Dawson, Sarah, Kendrick, Tony·2019·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of interventions to manage antidepressant discontinuation, and the outcomes for patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis of studies published to March 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies assessing interventions to facilitate discontinuation of antidepressants for depression in adults. Our primary outcomes were antidepressant discontinuation and discontinuation symptoms. Secondary outcomes were relapse/recurrence; quality of life; antidepressant reduction; and sexual, social, and occupational function. RESULTS: Of 15 included studies, 12 studies (8 randomized controlled trials, 2 single-arm trials, 2 retrospective cohort studies) were included in the synthesis. None were rated as having high risk for selection or detection bias. Two studies prompting primary care clinician discontinuation with antidepressant tapering guidance found 6% and 7% of patients discontinued, vs 8% for usual care. Six studies of psychological or psychiatric treatment plus tapering reported cessation rates of 40% to 95%. Two studies reported a higher risk of discontinuation symptoms with abrupt termination. At 2 years, risk of relapse/recurrence was lower with cognitive behavioral therapy plus taper vs clinical management plus taper (15% to 25% vs 35% to 80%: risk ratio = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67; 2 studies). Relapse/recurrence rates were similar for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with tapering and maintenance antidepressants (44% to 48% vs 47% to 60%; 2 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioral therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy can help patients discontinue antidepressants without increasing the risk of relapse/recurrence, but are resource intensive. More scalable interventions incorporating psychological support are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2336

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maund 2019 found no difference in recurrence or quality of life between MBCT plus tapering and maintenance antidepressants across two studies.

    “They found no difference in recurrence or quality of life between MBCT and tapering versus maintenance antidepressants treatment (2 studies).”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Maund 2019

    The “Recurrence After More Than 6 Months” section reports no difference in recurrence between MBCT with tapering support and maintenance antidepressants in a meta-analysis of two studies. The “Quality of Life” section reports no significant difference at 12 months or later, but a significant difference favoring MBCT with tapering support in psychological and social quality-of-life domains after one month. The claim omits that short-term exception. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maund 2019 included observational studies and excluded placebo-controlled trials.

    “Maund 2019 included observational studies and excluded placebocontrolled trials.”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Maund 2019

    The Results section reports that the review included two retrospective cohort studies, supporting the observational-studies portion. The Study Inclusion and Exclusion section excludes placebo-controlled trials aimed only at testing maintenance antidepressants to prevent relapse or recurrence; it does not state a blanket exclusion of all placebo-controlled trials. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maund 2019 concluded that prompting general practitioners to review long-term antidepressant users was not effective for discontinuation, based on one RCT and one uncontrolled trial.

    “Based on one RCT -Eveleigh 2018 -and one uncontrolled trial -Johnson 2012, they concluded that prompting GPs to review participants on long-term antidepressants was not an effective intervention to discontinue antidepressants (Maund 2019).”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Maund 2019

    The Discontinuation of Antidepressants section reports no significant difference between clinician letters with tapering advice (6% discontinuation) and usual care (8%); its table also reports 7% discontinuation in Johnson’s single-arm trial. The Summary of Main Findings describes these as low rates for prompted primary-care review and guided tapering. However, the table identifies the Eveleigh RCT as 2015, not 2018. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maund 2019 found higher risk of withdrawal symptoms with abrupt discontinuation compared with tapering in two studies.

    “Maund 2019 found higher risk of withdrawal symptoms with abrupt discontinuation compared with tapering in two studies (one RCT and one retrospective cohort study)”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Maund 2019

    The Abstract says two studies reported a higher risk of discontinuation symptoms with abrupt termination. But the Discontinuation Symptoms section and Table 2 distinguish their outcomes: the retrospective cohort found significantly more discontinuation syndrome after abrupt withdrawal, while the RCT found more discontinuation-emergent adverse events but no statistically significant difference in discontinuation syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This review could not confirm Maund 2019's finding of higher withdrawal symptom risk with abrupt discontinuation versus tapering.

    “but we could not confirm this finding”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Maund 2019

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [50]50. Psaros C, Freeman M, Safren S, Barsky M, Cohen L. Cognitive- behavioral therapy in women discontinuing antidepressant in antici- pation of pregnancy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36: S347.
  2. [54]54. Lambregtse-Van Den Berg M, Burger H, Bockting CL, Bonsel GJ, Duvekot JJ, Torij HW. Stop or go? Tapering antidepressants in preg- nancy: A pragmatic multicenter RCT to investigate risk and benefits for mother and child. Arch Women Ment Health. 2015; 18(2): 403-404.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maund, E., Stuart, B., Moore, M., Dowrick, C., Geraghty, A. W. A., Dawson, S., & Kendrick, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
52-60
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2911553263
Cited by
82
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-1214-20004)
  • University College London
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-1214-20004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
antidepressant discontinuation, depression, antidepressant tapering, discontinuation symptoms, relapse and recurrence, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, primary care, quality of life
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Recurrence, Withholding Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review