Cited by 247Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

National Trends in Long-Term Use of Antidepressant Medications: Results From the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Mojtabai, Ramin, Olfson, Mark·2014·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Article AbstractObjective: To assess the trend in long-term use of antidepressants by persons aged ≥ 18 years, and the correlates of such use, in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Method: We examined trends in duration of antidepressant use and correlates of long-term use in data from 6 waves of the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (N = 35,379), a representative survey of the general population. Results: The overall prevalence of antidepressant use increased from 6.5% in 1999-2000 to 10.4% in 2009-2010 (odds ratio = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31-1.81; P < .001). This included an increase from 3.0% to 6.9% in long-term use (≥ 24 months; OR = 2.12; 95% CI, 1.75-2.57; P < .001). Medium-term (6 to < 24 months; from 1.3% to 1.6%) and short-term use (< 6 months; from 2.2% to 1.8%) of antidepressants did not change appreciably in this period. The increasing trend in long-term antidepressant use was limited to adults who received their care from general medical providers (adjusted OR = 3.86; 95% CI, 2.57-5.80; P < .001). Conclusions: From 1999 to 2010, there was a marked increase in long-term use of antidepressant medications in the United States, explaining the overall increasing trend in antidepressant use. This trend calls for greater vigilance in prescribing antidepressants for long periods of time. J Clin Psychiatry © Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. Submitted: February 26, 2013; accepted July 9, 2013. Online ahead of print: December 10, 2013 (doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08443). Corresponding author: Ramin Mojtabai, MD, PhD, MPH, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Hampton House/Room 797, Baltimore, MD 21205 (rmojtaba@jhsph.edu).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.13m08443

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mojtabai, R., & Olfson, M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Mojtabai, Ramin
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
75
Issue
02
Pages
169-177
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075265772
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11
FWCI
22.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (NCT01528839.)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
antidepressant use, long-term antidepressant use, antidepressant prescribing trends, depression, general medical care, prescribing patterns, United States adults, NHANES, mental health service utilization, insurance status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Drug Prescriptions, Time Factors, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review