Cited by 204Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Shared Decision Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Krones, T., Keller, H., Sonnichsen, A., Sadowski, E.-M., Baum, E., Wegscheider, K., Rochon, J., Donner-Banzhoff, N.·2008·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the effect of promoting the effective communication of absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and shared decision making through disseminating a simple decision aid for use in family practice consultations. METHODS: The study was based on a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (phase III) with continuing medical education (CME) groups of family physicians as the unit of randomization. In the intervention arm, 44 physicians (7 CME groups) consecutively recruited 550 patients in whom cholesterol levels were measured. Forty-seven physicians in the control arm (7 CME groups) similarly included 582 patients. Four hundred sixty patients (83.6%) of the intervention arm and 466 patients (80.1%) of the control arm were seen at follow-up. Physicians attended 2 interactive CME sessions and received a booklet, a paper-based risk calculator, and individual summary sheets for each patient. Control physicians attended 1 CME-session on an alternative topic. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction and participation after the index consultation, change in CVD risk status, and decisional regret at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Intervention patients were significantly more satisfied with process and result (Patient Participation Scale, difference 0.80, P<.001). Decisional regret was significantly lower at follow-up (difference 3.39, P = .02). CVD risk decreased in both groups without a significant difference between study arms. CONCLUSION: A simple transactional decision aid based on calculating absolute individual CVD risk and promoting shared decision making in CVD prevention can be disseminated through CME groups and may lead to higher patient satisfaction and involvement and less decisional regret, without negatively affecting global CVD risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.854

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bennett C, O'Connor AM, Stacey D, et al. Does the addition of 25 new trials to the Cochrane Review of patient decision aids change bottom line results? In: Härter M, Simon D, Loh A, eds. International Shared Decision Making Conference. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publish- ers; 2007:88.
  2. Donner-Banzhoff N, Keller H, Sadowski E, et al. Individualisierte |Risikoprognose für die Herz-Kreislauf-Prävention: ein Werkstatt- bericht. In: Kunz R, Ollenschläger G, Raspe H, Jonitz G, Donner- Banzhoff N, eds. Lehrbuch Evidenzbasierte Medizin. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2007:295-304.
  3. Sadowski E, Eimer C, Keller H, et al. Evaluation komplexer Interven- tionen: Implementierung von ARRIBA Herz, einer Beratungsstrat- egie für die Herz-Kreislauf-Prävention. Z f Allg Med. 2005;81: 429-434.
  4. Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM, et al. A patient deci- sion aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fi brillation. JAMA. 1999;282(8):737-743.
  5. Krones T, Keller H, Sönnichsen AC, Sadowski EM, Baum E, Don- ner-Banzhoff N. Partizipative Entscheidungsfi ndung in der kar- diovaskulären Risikoprävention: Ergebnisse der Pilotstudie von ARRIBA-Herz, einer konsultationsbezogenen Entscheidungshilfe für die allgemeinmedizinische Praxis [Shared decision making in cardiovascular prevention: results from the piloting of ARRIBA-Herz, a transactional decision aid for general practice]. Z Med Psychol. 2006;15(2):61-70.
  6. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomized trials. BMJ. 2004;328(7441): 702-708.
  7. Rogers EM. Diffusions of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press;1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krones, T., Keller, H., Sonnichsen, A., Sadowski, E.-M., Baum, E., Wegscheider, K., Rochon, J., & Donner-Banzhoff, N.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Krones, T.
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
218-227
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2169727328
Cited by
204
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
25.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
shared decision-making, decision aids, cardiovascular risk communication, cholesterol screening, general practitioners, continuing medical education, patient satisfaction, decision regret, cardiovascular disease prevention, risk calculator
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Health Behavior, Patient Satisfaction, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review