The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
Most excitatory synapses terminate on dendritic spines. Spines vary in size, and their volumes are proportional to the area of the postsynaptic density (PSD) and synaptic strength. PSD-95 is an abundant multi-domain postsynaptic scaffolding protein that clusters glutamate receptors and organizes the associated signaling complexes. PSD-95 is thought to determine the size and strength of synapses. Although spines and their synapses can persist for months in vivo, PSD-95 and other PSD proteins have shorter half-lives in vitro, on the order of hours. To probe the mechanisms underlying synapse stability, we measured the dynamics of synaptic PSD-95 clusters in vivo. Using two-photon microscopy, we imaged PSD-95 tagged with GFP in layer 2/3 dendrites in the developing (postnatal day 10-21) barrel cortex. A subset of PSD-95 clusters was stable for days. Using two-photon photoactivation of PSD-95 tagged with photoactivatable GFP (paGFP), we measured the time over which PSD-95 molecules were retained in individual spines. Synaptic PSD-95 turned over rapidly (median retention times tau(r) is approximately 22-63 min from P10-P21) and exchanged with PSD-95 in neighboring spines by diffusion. PSDs therefore share a dynamic pool of PSD-95. Large PSDs in large spines captured more diffusing PSD-95 and also retained PSD-95 longer than small PSDs. Changes in the sizes of individual PSDs over days were associated with concomitant changes in PSD-95 retention times. Furthermore, retention times increased with developmental age (tau(r) is approximately 100 min at postnatal day 70) and decreased dramatically following sensory deprivation. Our data suggest that individual PSDs compete for PSD-95 and that the kinetic interactions between PSD molecules and PSDs are tuned to regulate PSD size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy
Denk, W., Strickler, J. H., & Webb, W. W. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2321027 · Cited by 9,488
Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector
Hitoshi, N., Ken-ichi, Y., & Jun-ichi, M. (1991) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-d · Cited by 5,134
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N. G., Palmer, A. E., & Tsien, R. Y. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1037 · Cited by 4,619
Berg, H. C. (2025) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691279886 · Cited by 2,367
Partitioning of Lipid-Modified Monomeric GFPs into Membrane Microdomains of Live Cells
Zacharias, D. A., Violin, J. D., Newton, A. C., & Tsien, R. Y. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068539 · Cited by 2,235
Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex
Trachtenberg, J. T., Chen, B. E., Knott, G. W., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01273 · Cited by 1,927
Self-citationThe molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory
Lisman, J., Schulman, H., & Cline, H. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn753 · Cited by 1,860
A Photoactivatable GFP for Selective Photolabeling of Proteins and Cells
Patterson, G. H., & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1074952 · Cited by 1,612
PDZ domain proteins of synapses
Kim, E., & Sheng, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1517 · Cited by 1,577
Matsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Nemoto, T., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., & Kasai, H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn736 · Cited by 1,563
Cited by
Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators
Tian, L., Hires, S. A., Mao, T., Huber, D., Chiappe, M. E., Chalasani, S. H., Petreanu, L., Akerboom, J., McKinney, S. A., Schreiter, E. R., et al. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1398 · Cited by 1,967
Self-citationExperience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain
Holtmaat, A., & Svoboda, K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2699 · Cited by 1,934
Self-citationSynaptic AMPA receptor plasticity and behavior
Kessels, H. W., & Malinow, R. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.015 · Cited by 993
Channelrhodopsin-2-assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections
Petreanu, L., Huber, D., Sobczyk, A., & Svoboda, K. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1891 · Cited by 930
Self-citationDo thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember?
Bourne, J., & Harris, K. M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.009 · Cited by 843
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, N. W., Weimer, R. M., Bureau, I., & Svoboda, K.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-11-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e370
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2014163893
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040370
- The paper
- Gray, N. W., Weimer, R. M., Bureau, I., & Svoboda, K. (2006). Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.