The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Detailed History of Intron-rich Eukaryotic Ancestors Inferred from a Global Survey of 100 Complete Genomes
Open accessAbstract
Protein-coding genes in eukaryotes are interrupted by introns, but intron densities widely differ between eukaryotic lineages. Vertebrates, some invertebrates and green plants have intron-rich genes, with 6-7 introns per kilobase of coding sequence, whereas most of the other eukaryotes have intron-poor genes. We reconstructed the history of intron gain and loss using a probabilistic Markov model (Markov Chain Monte Carlo, MCMC) on 245 orthologous genes from 99 genomes representing the three of the five supergroups of eukaryotes for which multiple genome sequences are available. Intron-rich ancestors are confidently reconstructed for each major group, with 53 to 74% of the human intron density inferred with 95% confidence for the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA). The results of the MCMC reconstruction are compared with the reconstructions obtained using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Dollo parsimony methods. An excellent agreement between the MCMC and ML inferences is demonstrated whereas Dollo parsimony introduces a noticeable bias in the estimations, typically yielding lower ancestral intron densities than MCMC and ML. Evolution of eukaryotic genes was dominated by intron loss, with substantial gain only at the bases of several major branches including plants and animals. The highest intron density, 120 to 130% of the human value, is inferred for the last common ancestor of animals. The reconstruction shows that the entire line of descent from LECA to mammals was intron-rich, a state conducive to the evolution of alternative splicing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes
Wang, E. T., Sandberg, R., Luo, S., Khrebtukova, I., Zhang, L., Mayr, C., Kingsmore, S. F., Schroth, G. P., & Burge, C. B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07509 · Cited by 5,181
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function
Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., & Ast, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2776 · Cited by 1,082
Keeling, P. J., Burger, G., Durnford, D. G., Lang, B. F., Lee, R. W., Pearlman, R. E., Roger, A. J., & Gray, M. W. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 · Cited by 579
Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G., & Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00558-x · Cited by 445
Self-citationThe origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics
Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-209 · Cited by 345
Self-citationComplex Spliceosomal Organization Ancestral to Extant Eukaryotes
Collins, L., & Penny, D. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi091 · Cited by 240
Deep Questions in the Tree of Life
Keeling, P. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149593 · Cited by 33
Cited by
Alternative Splicing Regulatory Networks: Functions, Mechanisms, and Evolution
Ule, J., & Blencowe, B. J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.017 · Cited by 780
Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution
Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300037 · Cited by 314
Self-citationKoonin, E. V. (2014) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-014-0169-5 · Cited by 34
Self-citationIntegrating Phylogenetics With Intron Positions Illuminates the Origin of the Complex Spliceosome
Vosseberg, J., Stolker, D., von der Dunk, S. H. A., & Snel, B. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad011 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Csuros, M., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-09-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1002150
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2079301867
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Detailed History of Intron-rich Eukaryotic Ancestors Inferred from a Global Survey of 100 Complete Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002150
- The paper
- Csuros, M., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V. (2011). A Detailed History of Intron-rich Eukaryotic Ancestors Inferred from a Global Survey of 100 Complete Genomes. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.