Cited by 166Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Estimation of the dietary nutrient profile of free-roaming feral cats: possible implications for nutrition of domestic cats

Open access
Plantinga, Esther A., Bosch, Guido, Hendriks, Wouter H.·2011·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Cats are strict carnivores and in the wild rely on a diet solely based on animal tissues to meet their specific and unique nutritional requirements. Although the feeding ecology of cats in the wild has been well documented in the literature, there is no information on the precise nutrient profile to which the cat's metabolism has adapted. The present study aimed to derive the dietary nutrient profile of free-living cats. Studies reporting the feeding habits of cats in the wild were reviewed and data on the nutrient composition of the consumed prey items obtained from the literature. Fifty-five studies reported feeding strategy data of cats in the wild. After specific exclusion criteria, twenty-seven studies were used to derive thirty individual dietary nutrient profiles. The results show that feral cats are obligatory carnivores, with their daily energy intake from crude protein being 52 %, from crude fat 46 % and from N-free extract only 2 %. Minerals and trace elements are consumed in relatively high concentrations compared with recommended allowances determined using empirical methods. The calculated nutrient profile may be considered the nutrient intake to which the cat's metabolic system has adapted. The present study provides insight into the nutritive, as well as possible non-nutritive aspects of a natural diet of whole prey for cats and provides novel ways to further improve feline diets to increase health and longevity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511002285

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On average, the protein requirements of the red fox are typical of strict carnivores such as wolves (54%) or domestic and feral cats (52%).

    “Notwithstanding, the analysis of available studies providing a volumetric or biomass estimate of the importance of the food resources used by foxes throughout its European range revealed that, on average, the protein requirements of the fox are typical of strict carnivores such as wolves (54%)17 or domestic and feral cats (52%)34,35.”

    From Nutritional ecology of a prototypical generalist predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports that protein supplies 52% of feral cats’ daily energy intake and cites a study finding the same percentage in adult domestic cats’ voluntary intake. These are measures of intake, not protein requirements. This paper does not establish the red fox’s protein requirements. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Achterberg H & Metzger R (1980) Neue Untersuchungen und Erkentnisse zur Bedeutung der Hauskatze (Felis silves- tris f. catus) fu ¨r die Niederwildhege (New research and insights on the importance of the domestic cat (Felis silves- tris f. catus) for lower game management). In Jahresschrift des Kreismuseums Haldensleben (Annual Publication of the Haldensleben Regional Museum), vol. 21, pp. 74-83, Kreismuseum Haldensleben.
  2. Corbett LK (1979) Feeding ecology and social organisation of wild cats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
  3. Dierenfeld ES, Alcorn HL & Jacobsen KL (2002) Nutrient composition of whole vertebrate prey (excluding fish) fed in zoos. In AZA Nutrition Advisory Group Fact Sheet: A Review, pp. 1 -20. Silverspring, MD: American Zoo and Aquarium Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plantinga, E. A., Bosch, G., & Hendriks, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-10-12
Volume
106
Issue
S1
Pages
S35-S48
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2143269679
Cited by
166
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
feral cats, free-roaming cats, feline nutrition, feeding ecology, prey composition, energy intake, crude protein, crude fat, mineral intake, trace elements
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Animals, Wild, Cats, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Nutritive Value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review