CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 331Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations

Open access
Henn, Brenna M., Botigué, Laura R., Gravel, Simon, Wang, Wei, Brisbin, Abra, Byrnes, Jake K., Fadhlaoui-Zid, Karima, Zalloua, Pierre A., Moreno-Estrada, Andres, Bertranpetit, Jaume, Bustamante, Carlos D., Comas, David·2012·PLoS Genetics
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002397PMC PMC3257290
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

North African populations are distinct from sub-Saharan Africans based on cultural, linguistic, and phenotypic attributes; however, the time and the extent of genetic divergence between populations north and south of the Sahara remain poorly understood. Here, we interrogate the multilayered history of North Africa by characterizing the effect of hypothesized migrations from the Near East, Europe, and sub-Saharan Africa on current genetic diversity. We present dense, genome-wide SNP genotyping array data (730,000 sites) from seven North African populations, spanning from Egypt to Morocco, and one Spanish population. We identify a gradient of likely autochthonous Maghrebi ancestry that increases from east to west across northern Africa; this ancestry is likely derived from "back-to-Africa" gene flow more than 12,000 years ago (ya), prior to the Holocene. The indigenous North African ancestry is more frequent in populations with historical Berber ethnicity. In most North African populations we also see substantial shared ancestry with the Near East, and to a lesser extent sub-Saharan Africa and Europe. To estimate the time of migration from sub-Saharan populations into North Africa, we implement a maximum likelihood dating method based on the distribution of migrant tracts. In order to first identify migrant tracts, we assign local ancestry to haplotypes using a novel, principal component-based analysis of three ancestral populations. We estimate that a migration of western African origin into Morocco began about 40 generations ago (approximately 1,200 ya); a migration of individuals with Nilotic ancestry into Egypt occurred about 25 generations ago (approximately 750 ya). Our genomic data reveal an extraordinarily complex history of migrations, involving at least five ancestral populations, into North Africa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002397

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Map of samples and population structure of North Africa and neighboring populations. A) On the map, star symbols indicate the location of new population samples and circles indicate previously published samples. The decreasing proportions of Maghrebi ancestry is indicated in a west-to-east gradient of blue across North Africa. An unsupervised clustering algorithm, ADMIXTURE [25] was used to analyze population structure among 13 African, 2 European and 1 Near Eastern populations based on approximately 300 K autosomal SNP loci in common. The two main gradients of ancestry in North Africa (at k = 8), Maghrebi and Near Eastern, are emphasized with arrows. Other population colors in open circles match the colors displayed in the population structure analysis. B) We plot the full dataset assuming k = 2,4,6,8 ancestral populations. k = 10 and log likelihoods are presented in Figure S1.
Figure 1 Map of samples and population structure of North Africa and neighboring populations. A) On the map, star symbols indicate the location of new population samples and circles indicate previously published samples. The decreasing proportions of Maghrebi ancestry is indicated in a west-to-east gradient of blue across North Africa. An unsupervised clustering algorithm, ADMIXTURE [25] was used to analyze population structure among 13 African, 2 European and 1 Near Eastern populations based on approximately 300 K autosomal SNP loci in common. The two main gradients of ancestry in North Africa (at k = 8), Maghrebi and Near Eastern, are emphasized with arrows. Other population colors in open circles match the colors displayed in the population structure analysis. B) We plot the full dataset assuming k = 2,4,6,8 ancestral populations. k = 10 and log likelihoods are presented in Figure S1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Multidimensional scaling components discriminating genetic clusters in Africa. We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to discriminate clusters of genetic variation within Africa and neighboring regions. MDS was applied to the pairwise, individual identity-by-state (IBS) matrix of 279,500 SNPs using PLINK 1.07 software [45]. The top three MDS components were plotted together using R 2.11.1. A) In axis one is plotted dimension 1 and in axis two is plotted dimension 2. B) In axis one is plotted dimension 1 and in axis two is plotted dimension 3. Population colors match Figure 1B (k = 8), with the exception that the Fulani group was highlighted as a distinct population, indicated in light green. North African populations are all indicated in turquoise except for Tunisians that are shown in dark blue.
Figure 2 Multidimensional scaling components discriminating genetic clusters in Africa. We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to discriminate clusters of genetic variation within Africa and neighboring regions. MDS was applied to the pairwise, individual identity-by-state (IBS) matrix of 279,500 SNPs using PLINK 1.07 software [45]. The top three MDS components were plotted together using R 2.11.1. A) In axis one is plotted dimension 1 and in axis two is plotted dimension 2. B) In axis one is plotted dimension 1 and in axis two is plotted dimension 3. Population colors match Figure 1B (k = 8), with the exception that the Fulani group was highlighted as a distinct population, indicated in light green. North African populations are all indicated in turquoise except for Tunisians that are shown in dark blue.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Divergence time estimates among European, Maghrebi, and Near Eastern ancestral populations. We use population-based Fst to estimate divergence time between each of the North African populations and the Qatari (green dots) and Tuscans (purple dots), respectively. We assume point estimates of effective population sizes based on autosomal haplotype heterozygosity estimates from Li et al. [17] (Material and Methods). We further estimate ancestral population clusters assigned at k = 5–8 with ADMIXTURE. Assuming that the ancestral clustering procedure has removed, or at least mitigated, the effect of recent migrations into Mediterranean populations, we then use Fst to estimate divergence times between these ancestral clusters. The range of k-based estimates for Maghrebi versus Near Eastern ancestry is indicated with light green polygon. The range of k-based estimates for Magrebi versus European ancestry is indicated with light purple polygon.
Figure 3 Divergence time estimates among European, Maghrebi, and Near Eastern ancestral populations. We use population-based Fst to estimate divergence time between each of the North African populations and the Qatari (green dots) and Tuscans (purple dots), respectively. We assume point estimates of effective population sizes based on autosomal haplotype heterozygosity estimates from Li et al. [17] (Material and Methods). We further estimate ancestral population clusters assigned at k = 5–8 with ADMIXTURE. Assuming that the ancestral clustering procedure has removed, or at least mitigated, the effect of recent migrations into Mediterranean populations, we then use Fst to estimate divergence times between these ancestral clusters. The range of k-based estimates for Maghrebi versus Near Eastern ancestry is indicated with light green polygon. The range of k-based estimates for Magrebi versus European ancestry is indicated with light purple polygon.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Distribution of long segments that are identical by descent (IBD) for pairs of individuals. The cumulative amount of DNA shared IBD between each pair of individuals within a population was summed. We display counts of the number of pairs sharing cumulative IBD in A) Tunisian Berbers, B) Saharawi and B) North Moroccans.
Figure 4 Distribution of long segments that are identical by descent (IBD) for pairs of individuals. The cumulative amount of DNA shared IBD between each pair of individuals within a population was summed. We display counts of the number of pairs sharing cumulative IBD in A) Tunisian Berbers, B) Saharawi and B) North Moroccans.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Correlation between ancestry proportions inferred from ADMIXTURE and PCADMIX. We compare the proportions of ancestry inferred from assuming 3 ancestral populations in individuals from South Morocco A) using a clustering algorithm set to k = 8 (Figure 1) summing the sub-Saharan ancestry, both Qatar and European ancestry, and Maghrebi ancestry. We compared these estimates (left bar) to our PCA-based local ancestry assignment estimates (right bar). The three ancestral populations were Saharawi [SAH], Bantu-speaking Luhya [LWK], and Spanish Basque [BAS]. B) Genome admixture deconvolution on chromosome 1 of sixteen South Moroccans. Using a principal component-based method of admixture deconvolution, we assign local ancestry to South Moroccan individuals. We implement our PCA-based method for k = 3, and choose the ancestral populations based on the three ancestral populations were Saharawi [SAH], Bantu-speaking Luhya [LWK], and Spanish Basque [BAS]. Chromosome 1 for all sixteen South Moroccans is presented for both the maternal and paternal haplotypes.
Figure 5 Correlation between ancestry proportions inferred from ADMIXTURE and PCADMIX. We compare the proportions of ancestry inferred from assuming 3 ancestral populations in individuals from South Morocco A) using a clustering algorithm set to k = 8 (Figure 1) summing the sub-Saharan ancestry, both Qatar and European ancestry, and Maghrebi ancestry. We compared these estimates (left bar) to our PCA-based local ancestry assignment estimates (right bar). The three ancestral populations were Saharawi [SAH], Bantu-speaking Luhya [LWK], and Spanish Basque [BAS]. B) Genome admixture deconvolution on chromosome 1 of sixteen South Moroccans. Using a principal component-based method of admixture deconvolution, we assign local ancestry to South Moroccan individuals. We implement our PCA-based method for k = 3, and choose the ancestral populations based on the three ancestral populations were Saharawi [SAH], Bantu-speaking Luhya [LWK], and Spanish Basque [BAS]. Chromosome 1 for all sixteen South Moroccans is presented for both the maternal and paternal haplotypes.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Genome admixture deconvolution karyogram of an Egyptian. A single Egyptian individual is presented for ancestry assuming k = 4 source populations: Saharawi [SAH], Nilotic-speaking Maasai [MKK], Spanish Basque [BAS] and Arabic Qatari [QAT]. Maasai segments (which were inferred from k = 3 and were highly diverged from the SAH, QAT, BAS segments) are layered on top of the inferred Maghrebi/Qatari/Basque ancestral karyogram, for k = 4 putative source populations.
Figure 6 Genome admixture deconvolution karyogram of an Egyptian. A single Egyptian individual is presented for ancestry assuming k = 4 source populations: Saharawi [SAH], Nilotic-speaking Maasai [MKK], Spanish Basque [BAS] and Arabic Qatari [QAT]. Maasai segments (which were inferred from k = 3 and were highly diverged from the SAH, QAT, BAS segments) are layered on top of the inferred Maghrebi/Qatari/Basque ancestral karyogram, for k = 4 putative source populations.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 331

Related

Metadata

Authors
Henn, B. M., Botigué, L. R., Gravel, S., Wang, W., Brisbin, A., Byrnes, J. K., Fadhlaoui-Zid, K., Zalloua, P. A., Moreno-Estrada, A., Bertranpetit, J., Bustamante, C. D., & Comas, D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Lebanese American University (LB)
Corresponding author
  • Bustamante, Carlos D.
  • Comas, David
ORCID
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2012-01-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e1002397
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
DOI
10.1371/journal.pgen.1002397
PMC
PMC3257290
OpenAlex
W2059277852
Cited by
331
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2009SGR1101)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003229)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083606)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
Berber populations, migration timing, local ancestry, Morocco
MeSH terms
Egypt, Ancient, Africa, Northern, DNA, Mitochondrial, Emigration and Immigration, Europe, Gene Pool, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Middle East, Morocco, Population, Population Dynamics, Genetic Variation, Africa South of the Sahara, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Black People, White People, History, Ancient, Gene Flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review