Cited by 539Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Sensitive detection of chromosomal segments of distinct ancestry in admixed populations

Open access
Price, Alkes L., Tandon, Arti, Patterson, Nick, Barnes, Kathleen C., Rafaels, Nicholas, Ruczinski, Ingo, Beaty, Terri H., Mathias, Rasika +2 more·2009·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Identifying the ancestry of chromosomal segments of distinct ancestry has a wide range of applications from disease mapping to learning about history. Most methods require the use of unlinked markers; but, using all markers from genome-wide scanning arrays, it should in principle be possible to infer the ancestry of even very small segments with exquisite accuracy. We describe a method, HAPMIX, which employs an explicit population genetic model to perform such local ancestry inference based on fine-scale variation data. We show that HAPMIX outperforms other methods, and we explore its utility for inferring ancestry, learning about ancestral populations, and inferring dates of admixture. We validate the method empirically by applying it to populations that have experienced recent and ancient admixture: 935 African Americans from the United States and 29 Mozabites from North Africa. HAPMIX will be of particular utility for mapping disease genes in recently admixed populations, as its accurate estimates of local ancestry permit admixture and case-control association signals to be combined, enabling more powerful tests of association than with either signal alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000519

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In simulation studies, the ARHMM achieves comparable accuracy as HapMix, but is more flexible and does not require information about the recombination rate.

    “In simulation studies, the ARHMM achieves comparable accuracy as HapMix [49], but is more flexible and does not require information about the recombination rate.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, A. L., Tandon, A., Patterson, N., Barnes, K. C., Rafaels, N., Ruczinski, I., Beaty, T. H., Mathias, R., Reich, D., & Myers, S.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Reich, David
  • Myers, Simon
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2009-06-19
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
e1000519
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2064902628
Cited by
539
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 62
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL087699)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
local ancestry inference, admixture, population genetic models, African Americans, Mozabites, disease mapping, case-control association, ancestral populations
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Chromosomes, Human, Disease, Genetics, Population, Humans, Models, Genetic, Software, Evolution, Molecular, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review