Cited by 59Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Blood-informative transcripts define nine common axes of peripheral blood gene expression

Open access
Preininger, Marcela, Arafat, Dalia, Kim, Jinhee, Nath, Artika P., Idaghdour, Youssef, Brigham, Kenneth L., Gibson, Greg·2013·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

We describe a novel approach to capturing the covariance structure of peripheral blood gene expression that relies on the identification of highly conserved Axes of variation. Starting with a comparison of microarray transcriptome profiles for a new dataset of 189 healthy adult participants in the Emory-Georgia Tech Center for Health Discovery and Well-Being (CHDWB) cohort, with a previously published study of 208 adult Moroccans, we identify nine Axes each with between 99 and 1,028 strongly co-regulated transcripts in common. Each axis is enriched for gene ontology categories related to sub-classes of blood and immune function, including T-cell and B-cell physiology and innate, adaptive, and anti-viral responses. Conservation of the Axes is demonstrated in each of five additional population-based gene expression profiling studies, one of which is robustly associated with Body Mass Index in the CHDWB as well as Finnish and Australian cohorts. Furthermore, ten tightly co-regulated genes can be used to define each Axis as "Blood Informative Transcripts" (BITs), generating scores that define an individual with respect to the represented immune activity and blood physiology. We show that environmental factors, including lifestyle differences in Morocco and infection leading to active or latent tuberculosis, significantly impact specific axes, but that there is also significant heritability for the Axis scores. In the context of personalized medicine, reanalysis of the longitudinal profile of one individual during and after infection with two respiratory viruses demonstrates that specific axes also characterize clinical incidents. This mode of analysis suggests the view that, rather than unique subsets of genes marking each class of disease, differential expression reflects movement along the major normal Axes in response to environmental and genetic stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003362

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Molecular indicators of human well-being such as the CTRA and blood-informative transcripts (BIT) may add a new dimension to social, cultural, and political discourse by providing objective leading indicators of human biological well-being that can help gauge the extent to which particular social conditions are congruent with basic human nature and help realize our genomically endowed potential.

    “molecular indicators of human well-being such as the CTRA and blood-informative transcripts (BIT) [12], [64] may add a new dimension to social, cultural, and political discourse by providing objective leading indicators of human biological well-being”

    From Human Social Genomics (2014) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preininger, M., Arafat, D., Kim, J., Nath, A. P., Idaghdour, Y., Brigham, K. L., & Gibson, G.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Greg
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e1003362
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W1999418667
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Emory University
  • Academy of Finland (118065)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
peripheral blood gene expression, immune function, innate and adaptive immunity, tuberculosis infection, body mass index, heritability, gene expression profiling, personalized medicine, respiratory viral infections, lifestyle differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, B-Lymphocytes, Blood Proteins, Female, Georgia, Humans, Morocco, Gene Expression, Body Mass Index, Gene Expression Profiling, Microarray Analysis, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review