Cited by 59Stress Responses and CortisolTryptophan and brain disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Blood gene expression profiles suggest altered immune function associated with symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Wingo, Aliza P., Gibson, Greg·2015·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Prospective epidemiological studies found that generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) can impair immune function and increase risk for cardiovascular disease or events. Mechanisms underlying the physiological reverberations of anxiety, however, are still elusive. Hence, we aimed to investigate molecular processes mediating effects of anxiety on physical health using blood gene expression profiles of 336 community participants (157 anxious and 179 control). We examined genome-wide differential gene expression in anxiety, as well as associations between nine major modules of co-regulated transcripts in blood gene expression and anxiety. No significant differential expression was observed in women, but 631 genes were differentially expressed between anxious and control men at the false discovery rate of 0.1 after controlling for age, body mass index, race, and batch effect. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that genes with altered expression levels in anxious men were involved in response of various immune cells to vaccination and to acute viral and bacterial infection, and in a metabolic network affecting traits of metabolic syndrome. Further, we found one set of 260 co-regulated genes to be significantly associated with anxiety in men after controlling for the relevant covariates, and demonstrate its equivalence to a component of the stress-related conserved transcriptional response to adversity profile. Taken together, our results suggest potential molecular pathways that can explain negative effects of GAD observed in epidemiological studies. Remarkably, even mild anxiety, which most of our participants had, was associated with observable changes in immune-related gene expression levels. Our findings generate hypotheses and provide incremental insights into molecular mechanisms mediating negative physiological effects of GAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.09.016

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within a community sample of individuals with and without GAD, only males with GAD showed changes in immune-related gene expression compared with controls.

    “Within a community sample of individuals with and without GAD, Wingo and Gibson (2015) found that only males with GAD showed changes in immune-related gene expression compared with controls (Wingo and Gibson, 2015).”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Wingo and Gibson, 2015

    The Abstract reports differential expression of 631 genes in anxious men but none significant in women, and links the altered genes to immune responses. However, Methods §2.2 defines the groups by GAD-7 symptom scores, not by confirmed GAD diagnoses; describing them as individuals with and without GAD overstates what was measured. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wingo, A. P., & Gibson, G.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Greg
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
43
Pages
184-191
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057239687
Cited by
59
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Career Development Award (IK2CX000601)
  • NARSAD Young Investigator Award (P01GM099568)
  • Georgia Tech Research Institute
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • NIH
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • NIGMS (P01 GM099568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, blood gene expression, immune function, sex differences, cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, immune response to infection, stress response, mild anxiety
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Immune System, Male, Middle Aged, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review