The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bovine Host Genetic Variation Influences Rumen Microbial Methane Production with Best Selection Criterion for Low Methane Emitting and Efficiently Feed Converting Hosts Based on Metagenomic Gene Abundance
Open accessAbstract
Methane produced by methanogenic archaea in ruminants contributes significantly to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The host genetic link controlling microbial methane production is unknown and appropriate genetic selection strategies are not developed. We used sire progeny group differences to estimate the host genetic influence on rumen microbial methane production in a factorial experiment consisting of crossbred breed types and diets. Rumen metagenomic profiling was undertaken to investigate links between microbial genes and methane emissions or feed conversion efficiency. Sire progeny groups differed significantly in their methane emissions measured in respiration chambers. Ranking of the sire progeny groups based on methane emissions or relative archaeal abundance was consistent overall and within diet, suggesting that archaeal abundance in ruminal digesta is under host genetic control and can be used to genetically select animals without measuring methane directly. In the metagenomic analysis of rumen contents, we identified 3970 microbial genes of which 20 and 49 genes were significantly associated with methane emissions and feed conversion efficiency respectively. These explained 81% and 86% of the respective variation and were clustered in distinct functional gene networks. Methanogenesis genes (e.g. mcrA and fmdB) were associated with methane emissions, whilst host-microbiome cross talk genes (e.g. TSTA3 and FucI) were associated with feed conversion efficiency. These results strengthen the idea that the host animal controls its own microbiota to a significant extent and open up the implementation of effective breeding strategies using rumen microbial gene abundance as a predictor for difficult-to-measure traits on a large number of hosts. Generally, the results provide a proof of principle to use the relative abundance of microbial genes in the gastrointestinal tract of different species to predict their influence on traits e.g. human metabolism, health and behaviour, as well as to understand the genetic link between host and microbiome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a beef cattle experiment, Roehe et al. (2016) ranked beef sire progeny groups based on relative archaeal abundance and reported that group ranking remained consistent overall and within diet, suggesting that archaeal abundance in ruminal digesta is also, in part under host genetic control.”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Roehe et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Recent work using metagenomics and/or metatranscriptomics has confirmed significant relationships between the abundances of key rumen microbial genes and feed efficiency (Roehe et al., 2016; Shabat et al., 2016; Li and Guan, 2017) and/or methane production (Roehe et al., 2016).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Roehe et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“We are only in the early stages of applying these approaches to the rumen microbiome, and while network scaffolds for specific animal studies have been generated (Roehe et al., 2016), large-scale, integrative models have yet to be developed.”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Roehe et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease
The International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC), Jostins, L., Ripke, S., Weersma, R. K., Duerr, R. H., McGovern, D. P., Hui, K. Y., Lee, J. C., Philip Schumm, L., Sharma, Y., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11582 · Cited by 4,722
Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis
Yano, J. M., Yu, K., Donaldson, G. P., Shastri, G. G., Ann, P., Ma, L., Nagler, C. R., Ismagilov, R. F., Mazmanian, S. K., & Hsiao, E. Y. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047 · Cited by 3,614
Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome
Goodrich, J. K., Waters, J. L., Poole, A. C., Sutter, J. L., Koren, O., Blekhman, R., Beaumont, M., Van Treuren, W., Knight, R., Bell, J. T., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053 · Cited by 3,164
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714 · cited 1×
“The loss of feed gross energy as methane has been estimated at 2 to 12% [4].”
Hobson, P. N., & Stewart, C. S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7 · Cited by 2,159
H OW H OST -M ICROBIAL I NTERACTIONS S HAPE THE N UTRIENT E NVIRONMENT OF THE M AMMALIAN I NTESTINE
Hooper, L. V., Midtvedt, T., & Gordon, J. I. (2002) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.011602.092259 · Cited by 1,623
How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research?
Nguyen, T. L. A., Vieira-Silva, S., Liston, A., & Raes, J. (2015) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.017400 · Cited by 1,334
Benson, A. K., Kelly, S. A., Legge, R., Ma, F., Low, S. J., Kim, J., Zhang, M., Oh, P. L., Nehrenberg, D., Hua, K., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007028107 · Cited by 1,314
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G. C., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W. Z., Lee, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6583 · Cited by 1,086
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 374
Jia, P., Dong, L., Tu, Y., & Diao, Q. (2023) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-023-01654-3 · Cited by 42
Mulder, T. D., Peiren, N., Vandaele, L., Ruttink, T., Campeneere, S. D., de Wiele, T. V., & Goossens, K. (2017) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2017.11.009 · Cited by 43
Cunha, C. S., Marcondes, M. I., Veloso, C. M., Mantovani, H. C., Pereira, L. G. R., Tomich, T. R., Dill‐McFarland, K. A., & Suen, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9162 · Cited by 41
MAGpy: a reproducible pipeline for the downstream analysis of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs)
Stewart, R. D., Auffret, M. D., Snelling, T. J., Roehe, R., & Watson, M. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty905 · Cited by 37
Duthie, C.-A., Haskell, M. J., Hyslop, J. J., Waterhouse, A., Wallace, R. J., Roehe, R., & Rooke, J. A. (2017) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731117000301 · Cited by 43
Malik, P. K., Trivedi, S., Mohapatra, A., Kolte, A. P., Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., & Rahman, H. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256048 · Cited by 45
Stewart, R. D., Auffret, M. D., Roehe, R., & Watson, M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/421024 · Cited by 38
Liu, L., Wu, P., Guo, A., Yang, Y., Chen, F., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1206346 · Cited by 42
Saborío‐Montero, A., Gutiérrez‐Rivas, M., López-García, A., García-Rodríguez, A., Atxaerandio, R., Goiri, I., Jiménez-Montero, J. A., & González-Recio, Ó. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104538 · Cited by 40
Shinkai, T., Takizawa, S., Enishi, O., Higuchi, K., Ohmori, H., & Mitsumori, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1404991 · Cited by 43
A common vaginal microbiota composition among breeds of Bos taurus indicus (Gyr and Nellore)
Giannattasio-Ferraz, S., Laguardia-Nascimento, M., Gasparini, M. R., Leite, L. R., Araújo, F. M. G., Salim, A. C. M., Oliveira, A. P., Nicoli, J. R., Oliveira, G., da Fonseca, F. G., et al. (2019) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s42770-019-00120-3 · Cited by 36
Association between Rumen Microbiota and Marbling Score in Korean Native Beef Cattle
Kim, M., Park, T., Jeong, J. Y., Baek, Y.-C., & Lee, H. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10040712 · Cited by 38
Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production
Jones, H. E., & Wilson, P. (2022) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014 · Cited by 42
Vollmar, S., Wellmann, R., Borda-Molina, D., Rodehutscord, M., Camarinha‐Silva, A., & Bennewitz, J. (2020) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401424 · Cited by 35
Lengowski, M. B., Witzig, M., Möhring, J., Seyfang, G. M., & Rodehutscord, M. (2016) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.07.004 · Cited by 34
Saborío‐Montero, A., López-García, A., Gutiérrez‐Rivas, M., Atxaerandio, R., Goiri, I., García-Rodríguez, A., Jiménez-Montero, J. A., González, C., Tamames, J., Puente‐Sánchez, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-20005 · Cited by 37
Seyedin, S. M. V., Zeidi, A., Chamanehpour, E., Nasri, M. H. F., & Vargas‐Bello‐Pérez, E. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142416897 · Cited by 39
Golder, H. M., Thomson, J. M., Denman, S. E., McSweeney, C. S., & Lean, I. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00062 · Cited by 32
Bowen, J. M., Cormican, P., Lister, S. J., McCabe, M. S., Duthie, C.-A., Roehe, R., & Dewhurst, R. J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231759 · Cited by 39
Neves, A. L. A., Yu, J., Suzuki, Y., Báez-Magaña, M., Arutyunova, E. I., O’Hara, E., McAllister, T. A., Ominski, K., Lemieux, M. J., & Guan, L. L. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01147-1 · Cited by 33
Stergiadis, S., Luna, I. C., Mora-Ortiz, M., Stewart, R. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Humphries, D. J., Watson, M., Roehe, R., & Auffret, M. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.590441 · Cited by 32
Current applications and perspectives of genomic selection in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle
Júnior, G. A. F., Peripolli, E., Schmidt, P. I., Campos, G. S., Mota, L. F. M., Mercadante, M. E. Z., Baldi, F. S., Carvalheiro, R., & de Albuquerque, L. G. (2022) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105001 · Cited by 33
Wang, W., Dong, Y., Guo, W., Zhang, X., Degen, A. A., Bi, S., Ding, L., Chen, X., & Long, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1301258 · Cited by 30
Omondi, V. O., Bosire, G. O., Onyari, J. M., Kibet, C. K., Mwasya, S., Onyonyi, V. N., & Getahun, M. N. (2024) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.01228-23 · Cited by 31
Twomey, A. J., Sayers, R. G., Carroll, R. I., Byrne, N., Brien, E. O., Doherty, M. L., McClure, J. C., Graham, D. A., & Berry, D. P. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016-0621 · Cited by 29
Genetics and breeding of sheep and goats
Gootwine, E. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817052-6.00010-0 · Cited by 31
Lima, J., Manning, T., Rutherford, K., Baima, E. T., Dewhurst, R. J., Walsh, P., & Roehe, R. (2021) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106235 · Cited by 28
Sakamoto, L. S., Souza, L. L., Gianvecchio, S. B., de Oliveira, M. H. V., Silva, J. A. I. D. V., Canesin, R. C., Branco, R. H., Baccan, M., Berndt, A., de Albuquerque, L. G., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257964 · Cited by 28
Scarsella, E., Cintio, M., Iacumin, L., Ginaldi, F., & Stefanon, B. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10030531 · Cited by 28
Lima, J., Ingabire, W., Roehe, R., & Dewhurst, R. J. (2023) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci10120679 · Cited by 39
Malik, P. K., Trivedi, S., Kolte, A. P., Mohapatra, A., Biswas, S., Bhattar, A. V. K., Bhatta, R., & Rahman, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266025 · Cited by 33
Ma, X., Räisänen, S. E., Garcia-Ascolani, M. E., Bobkov, M., He, T., Islam, Z., Li, Y., Peng, R., Reichenbach, M., Serviento, A. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-24460 · Cited by 28
Xiang, R., McNally, J., Rowe, S. J., Jonker, A., Pinares-Patiño, C. S., Oddy, V. H., Vercoe, P. E., McEwan, J. C., & Dalrymple, B. P. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39022 · Cited by 26
Wang, H., Zheng, H., Browne, F., Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Engel, F., Hemmje, M., Lu, X., & Walsh, P. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.05.029 · Cited by 31
Sasson, G., Moraïs, S., Kokou, F., Plate, K., Trautwein‐Schult, A., Jami, E., Bayer, E. A., Becher, D., & Mizrahi, I. (2022) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-022-01295-8 · Cited by 29
Fonseca, P. A. D. S., Lam, S., Chen, Y., Waters, S. M., Guan, L. L., & Cánovas, Á. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43097-8 · Cited by 30
Host and rumen microbiome contributions to feed efficiency traits in Holstein cows
Boggio, G. M., Monteiro, H. F., de Lima, F. S., Figueiredo, C. C., Bisinotto, R. S., Santos, J. E. P., Mion, B., Schenkel, F. S., Ribeiro, E. S., WEIGEL, K. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-23869 · Cited by 37
Bharanidharan, R., Lee, C. H., Thirugnanasambantham, K., Ibidhi, R., Woo, Y. W., Lee, H., Kim, J. G., & Kim, K.-H. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.701081 · Cited by 28
Fregulia, P., Neves, A. L. A., Dias, R. J. P., & Campos, M. M. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104761 · Cited by 30
A glimpse of the future in animal nutrition science. 2. Current and future solutions
Tedeschi, L. O., Fonseca, M. A., MUIR, J. P., Poppi, D. P., Carstens, G. E., Angerer, J. P., & Fox, D. G. (2017) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.1590/s1806-92902017000500012 · Cited by 30
Prevotella copri , a potential indicator for high feed efficiency in western steers
Brooke, C. G., Najafi, N., Dykier, K. C., & Hess, M. (2019) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.13197 · Cited by 27
Sato, Y., Takebe, H., Tominaga, K., Oishi, K., Kumagai, H., Yoshida, T., & Hirooka, H. (2021) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiab152 · Cited by 24
González-Recio, Ó., Martínez-Álvaro, M., Tiezzi, F., Saborío‐Montero, A., Maltecca, C., & Roehe, R. (2023) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105171 · Cited by 28
Li, Z., Wang, X., Alberdi, A., Deng, J., Zhong, Z., Si, H., Zheng, C., Zhou, H., Wang, J., Yang, Y., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01311 · Cited by 23
Vigors, S., Doherty, J. V. O., & Sweeney, T. (2020) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731120001500 · Cited by 23
Fregulia, P., Campos, M. M., Dias, R. J. P., Liu, J., Guo, W., Pereira, L. G. R., Machado, M. A., Faza, D. R. D. L. R., Guan, L. L., Garnsworthy, P. C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1025173 · Cited by 26
Graham, C. F., Boreham, D. R., Manzon, R. G., Stott, W., Wilson, J. Y., & Somers, C. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226608 · Cited by 22
Asselstine, V., Lam, S., Miglior, F., Brito, L. F., Sweett, H., Guan, L. L., Waters, S. M., Plastow, G. S., & Cánovas, Á. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skab193 · Cited by 23
Comparison of HPLC and NMR for quantification of the main volatile fatty acids in rumen digesta
Wang, M., Wang, H., Zheng, H., Uhrı́n, D., Dewhurst, R. J., & Roehe, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03553-9 · Cited by 20
Unravelling vaginal microbial genetic diversity and abundance between Holstein and Fleckvieh cattle
Nesengani, L. T., Wang, J., Yang, Y., Yang, L., & Lu, W. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra10553c · Cited by 23
Lima, J., Martínez-Álvaro, M., Mattock, J., Auffret, M. D., Duthie, C.-A., Cleveland, M. A., Dewhurst, R. J., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-70770-3 · Cited by 19
Rumen Microbiota Predicts Feed Efficiency of Primiparous Nordic Red Dairy Cows
Tapio, M., Fischer, D., Mäntysaari, P., & Tapio, I. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11051116 · Cited by 22
Yang, C., McKain, N., McCartney, C. A., & Wallace, R. J. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.05.012 · Cited by 22
Host and altitude factors affect rumen bacteria in cattle
Wu, D., Vinitchaikul, P., Deng, M., Zhang, G., Sun, L., Gou, X., Mao, H., & Yang, S. (2020) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s42770-020-00380-4 · Cited by 19
Watson, M. (2018) · University of Edinburgh · doi:10.7488/ds/2438 · Cited by 21
Xiang, R., McNally, J., Bond, J. J., Tucker, D. J., Cameron, M., Donaldson, A. J., Austin, K. L., Rowe, S. J., Jonker, A., Pinares-Patiño, C. S., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00330 · Cited by 18
Review: Diving into the cow hologenome to reduce methane emissions and increase sustainability
González-Recio, Ó., Scrobota, N., López‐Paredes, J., Saborío‐Montero, A., Fernández, A., de Maturana, E. L., Villanueva, B., Goiri, I., Atxaerandio, R., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2023) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2023.100780 · Cited by 21
Baruselli, P. S., de Abreu, L. Â., de Paula, V. R., de Carvalho, B. C., Gricio, E. A., Mori, F., Rebeis, L. M., Albertini, S., Souza, A. H., & D’Occhio, M. J. (2023) · Animal Reproduction · doi:10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0060 · Cited by 21
Thapa, S., Zhou, S., O’Hair, J., Nasr, K. A., Ropelewski, A. J., & Li, H. (2023) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-023-00821-6 · Cited by 18
Roles of host genetics and sperm microbiota in reproductive success in healthy rabbit
Marco‐Jiménez, F., Borrás-Pérez, S., García‐Domínguez, X., D’Auria, G., Vicente, J. S., & Marín, C. (2020) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.09.028 · Cited by 19
Protozoal populations drive system-wide variation in the rumen microbiome
Kobel, C. M., Leu, A. O., de León, A. V.-P., Øyås, O., Lai, W., Altshuler, I., Hagen, L. H., Wollenberg, R. D., Søndergaard, M. T., Bakshani, C. R., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61302-2 · Cited by 20
Mulder, T. D., Vandaele, L., Peiren, N., Haegeman, A., Ruttink, T., Campeneere, S. D., de Wiele, T. V., & Goossens, K. (2018) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859618001053 · Cited by 17
Variation in methane production over time and physiological state in sheep
Oddy, V. H., Donaldson, A. J., Cameron, M., Bond, J. J., Dominik, S., & Robinson, D. L. (2018) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an17447 · Cited by 18
Developmental origin of peripheral ciliary band neurons in the sea urchin embryo
Slota, L. A., Miranda, E., Peskin, B., & McClay, D. R. (2019) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.12.011 · Cited by 17
Karimi, P., Bakhtiarizadeh, M. R., Salehi, A., & Izadnia, H. R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06528-6 · Cited by 16
Worku, D. (2024) · Animal Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/10495398.2024.2362677 · Cited by 18
Shi, J., Su, H., He, S., Dai, S., Mao, H., & Wu, D. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13061175 · Cited by 22
Martínez-Álvaro, M., Mattock, J., González-Recio, Ó., Saborío‐Montero, A., Weng, Z., Lima, J., Duthie, C.-A., Dewhurst, R. J., Cleveland, M. A., Watson, M., et al. (2024) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-024-00887-6 · Cited by 15
Neves, A. L. A., Chen, Y., Cao, K. L., Mandal, S., Sharpton, T. J., McAllister, T. A., & Guan, L. L. (2019) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731119002453 · Cited by 16
Lin, X., Ju, L., Cheng, Q., Jiang, Y., Hou, Q., Hu, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1013252 · Cited by 16
Lee, H., Kim, M., Masaki, T., Ikuta, K., Iwamoto, E., Nishihara, K., Nonaka, I., ASHIHARA, A., Baek, Y.-C., Lee, S., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55539-y · Cited by 17
A Knowledge-Driven Network-Based Analytical Framework for the Identification of Rumen Metabolites
Wang, M., Wang, H., Zheng, H., Dewhurst, R. J., & Roehe, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · doi:10.1109/tnb.2020.2991577 · Cited by 13
Malik, P. K., Trivedi, S., Kolte, A. P., Mohapatra, A., Biswas, S., Bhattar, A. V. K., Bhatta, R., & Rahman, H. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12010047 · Cited by 14
Mizrahi, I., & Jami, E. (2021) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202052269 · Cited by 13
Zeng, T., Huang, L., Ren, J., Chen, L., Tian, Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., Du, J., & Lu, L. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas2017.1714 · Cited by 14
Hess, M. K., Hodgkinson, H. E., Hess, A. S., Zetouni, L., Budel, J. C. D. C., Henry, H., Donaldson, A., Bilton, T. P., van Stijn, T. C., Kirk, M. R., et al. (2023) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09660-3 · Cited by 15
Jokela, H., Hakkarainen, J., Kätkänaho, L., Pakarinen, P., Ruohonen, S. T., Tena‐Sempere, M., Zhang, F., & POUTANEN, M. H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16618-5 · Cited by 11
Zhou, M., O’Hara, E., Tang, S., Chen, Y., Walpole, M. E., Górka, P., Penner, G. B., & Guan, L. L. (2021) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci8070138 · Cited by 13
Chagas, J. C. C., Ramin, M., Expósito, R. G., Smidt, H., & Krizsan, S. J. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11092597 · Cited by 15
Rumen multi-omics addressing diet–host–microbiome interplay in farm animals: a review
Dixit, S., Kumar, S., Sharma, R., Banakar, P. S., Singh, M., Keshri, A., & Tyagi, A. K. (2022) · Animal Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/10495398.2022.2078979 · Cited by 13
Slayi, M., Kayima, D., Jaja, I. F., Mapiye, C., & Dzama, K. (2023) · Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s13570-023-00275-7 · Cited by 16
Wang, M., Wang, H., Zheng, H., Dewhurst, R. J., & Roehe, R. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.09.014 · Cited by 11
Ángeles-Mayorga, Y., Cen-Cen, E. R., Crosby-Galván, M. M., Ramírez‐Bribiesca, J. E., Candelaria-Martínez, B., Sánchez‐Villarreal, A., & Ramírez-Mella, M. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12192628 · Cited by 21
Li, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, T., Si, H., Xu, C., Wright, A. G., & Li, G. (2019) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-019-1504-9 · Cited by 12
Review: Markers and proxies to monitor ruminal function and feed efficiency in young ruminants
Cheng, L., Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Meale, S. J., Rugoho, I., Jonker, A., Khan, M. A., Al-Marashdeh, O., & Dewhurst, R. J. (2021) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100337 · Cited by 14
Sandri, M., Sgorlon, S., Scarsella, E., & Stefanon, B. (2020) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.003 · Cited by 13
Frazier, A., Beck, M. R., Waldrip, H. M., & Koziel, J. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1503315 · Cited by 11
Fernando, S. C., Adams, S., Lakamp, A. D., & Spangler, M. L. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25797 · Cited by 10
Zhang, H., Tong, J., Wang, Z., Xiong, B., & Jiang, L. (2019) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.19.0226 · Cited by 10
Impact of animal breeding on GHG emissions and farm economicsPreprint
MacLeod, M. J., Leinonen, I., Eileen, W., Houdijk, J. G. M., Eory, V., Burns, J. G., Ahmadi, B. V., & Manuel, G. B. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.2760/731326 · Cited by 10
Zhu, S., Gu, F., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Jia, M., Valencak, T. G., Liu, J., & Sun, H. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-23066 · Cited by 9
Liang, Z., Zhang, J., Ahmad, A. A., Han, J., Gharechahi, J., Du, M., Zheng, J., Wang, P., Yan, P., Salekdeh, G. H., et al. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00788-23 · Cited by 9
Keogh, K. A., Kenny, D. A., Alexandre, P. A., Waters, S. M., McGovern, E., McGee, M., & Reverter, A. (2024) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-024-00337-0 · Cited by 11
Host-specific microbiome-rumination interactions shape methane-yield phenotypes in dairy cattle
Castaneda, A., Indugu, N., Lenker, K., Narayan, K. S., Rassler, S., Bender, J. S., Baker, L. D., Purandare, O., Chai, D., Zhao, X., et al. (2025) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00090-25 · Cited by 9
Bilton, T. P., Alemu, S. W., Dodds, K. G., Henry, H., Hess, M. K., Jordan, R., Booker, F., Hickey, S. M., Amyes, N. C., Knowler, K., et al. (2025) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-025-00973-3 · Cited by 9
Wang, S., Pisarcikova, J., Kreuzer, M., & Schwarm, A. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2016-0238 · Cited by 9
Solutions to enteric methane abatement in Ireland
Cummins, S., Lanigan, G. J., Richards, K. G., Boland, T. M., Kirwan, S. F., Smith, P. E., & Waters, S. M. (2022) · Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research · doi:10.15212/ijafr-2022-0014 · Cited by 7
Mitigating methane emissions and promoting acetogenesis in ruminant livestock
Mrutu, R. I., Abdussamad, A. M., Umar, K., Abdulhamid, A., & Farny, N. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2025.1489212 · Cited by 11
Alemu, S. W., Bilton, T. P., Johnson, P. L., Perry, B. J., Henry, H., Dodds, K. G., McEwan, J. C., & Rowe, S. J. (2025) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-025-00987-x · Cited by 12
Islam, Z., Räisänen, S. E., He, T., Kunz, C., Li, Y., Ma, X., Serviento, A. M., Wang, K., Wang, M., Zeng, Z., et al. (2025) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101603 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A., McKain, N., Ross, D. W., Hyslop, J. J., Waterhouse, A., Freeman, T. C., Watson, M., & Wallace, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Scotland's Rural College (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Roslin Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roehe, Rainer
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-02-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1005846
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC4758630
- OpenAlex
- W2275915069
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 81.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Scottish Government
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Medical Research Council (MR/K001744/1)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/D/05191132, BB/J004235/1, BBS/E/D/20211553, BBS/E/D/20211552, BBS/E/D/20211550, BBS/E/D/20211551, BB/N016742/1, BB/ J004243/1, BB/N01720X/1, BB/I001107/1, BBS/E/D/20310000)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NBAF010003)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- host genetic variation, methanogenic archaea, feed efficiency, rumen metagenomics, microbial gene abundance, diet effects, mcrA, host-microbiome interactions, genetic selection, livestock greenhouse gas emissions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Archaea, Cattle, Female, Male, Methane, Rumen, Genetic Variation, Metagenomics, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review