Cited by 246Clinical practice guidelines implementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines

Open access
Kavanagh, Brian P.·2009·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving health

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000094

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanagh, B. P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kavanagh, Brian P.
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e1000094
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W1991363364
Cited by
246
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Thoracic Society
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons
  • European Respiratory Society
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Socialstyrelsen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
GRADE system, guideline quality assessment, evidence-based medicine, health policy
MeSH terms
Humans, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Sepsis, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review