The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Evaluation of Commercial Fluorescent Bead-Based Luminex Cytokine Assays
Open accessAbstract
The recent introduction of fluorescent bead-based technology, allowing the measurement of multiples analytes in a single 25-50 microl sample has revolutionized the study of cytokine responses. However, such multiplex approaches may compromise the ability of these assays to accurately measure actual cytokine levels. This study evaluates the performance of three commercially available multiplex cytokine fluorescent bead-based immunoassays (Bio-Rad's Cytokine 17-plex kit; LINCO Inc's 29-plex kit; and RnD System's Fluorokine-Multi Analyte Profiling (MAP) base kit A and B). The LINCO Inc kit was found to be the most sensitive assay for measuring concentrations of multiple recombinant cytokines in samples that had been spiked with serial dilutions of the standard provided by the manufacturer, followed respectively by the RnD Fluorokine-(MAP) and Bio-Rad 17-plex kits. A positive correlation was found in the levels of IFN-gamma measured in antigen stimulated whole blood culture supernatants by the LINCO Inc 29-plex, RnD Fluorokine-(MAP) and RnD system IFN-gamma Quantikine ELISA kits across a panel of controls and stimulated samples. Researchers should take the limitation of such multiplexed assays into account when planning experiments and the most appropriate use for these tests may currently be as screening tools for the selection of promising markers for analysis by more sensitive techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive Analysis of Inflammatory Immune Mediators in Vitreoretinal Diseases
Yoshimura, T., Sonoda, K.-H., Sugahara, M., Mochizuki, Y., Enaida, H., Oshima, Y., Ueno, A., Hata, Y., Yoshida, H., & Ishibashi, T. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008158 · Cited by 342
Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Interferon Gamma Detection
Liu, Y., Tuleouva, N., Ramanculov, E., & Revzin, A. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac101409t · Cited by 324
Bioanalytical Chemistry of Cytokines–a Review
Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.009 · Cited by 302
Toxicology and risk assessment of coumarin: Focus on human data
Abraham, K., Wöhrlin, F., Lindtner, O., Heinemeyer, G., & Lampen, A. (2010) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900281 · Cited by 292
Leng, Y., Sun, K., Chen, X., & Li, W. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00382a · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Djoba Siawaya, J. F., Roberts, T., Babb, C., Black, G., Golakai, H. J., Stanley, K., Bapela, N. B., Hoal, E., Parida, S., van Helden, P., & Walzl, G.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-07-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e2535
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090866819
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evaluation of Commercial Fluorescent Bead-Based Luminex Cytokine Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0002535
- The paper
- Djoba Siawaya, J. F., Roberts, T., Babb, C., Black, G., Golakai, H. J., Stanley, K., Bapela, N. B., Hoal, E., Parida, S., van Helden, P., & Walzl, G. (2008). An Evaluation of Commercial Fluorescent Bead-Based Luminex Cytokine Assays. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.