The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI
Open accessAbstract
Background: When our PC goes on strike again we tend to curse it as if it were a human being.Why and under which circumstances do we attribute human-like properties to machines?Although humans increasingly interact directly with machines it remains unclear whether humans implicitly attribute intentions to them and, if so, whether such interactions resemble human-human interactions on a neural level.In social cognitive neuroscience the ability to attribute intentions and desires to others is being referred to as having a Theory of Mind (ToM).With the present study we investigated whether an increase of human-likeness of interaction partners modulates the participants' ToM associated cortical activity.Methodology/Principal Findings: By means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (subjects n = 20) we investigated cortical activity modulation during highly interactive human-robot game.Increasing degrees of human-likeness for the game partner were introduced by means of a computer partner, a functional robot, an anthropomorphic robot and a human partner.The classical iterated prisoner's dilemma game was applied as experimental task which allowed for an implicit detection of ToM associated cortical activity.During the experiment participants always played against a random sequence unknowingly to them.Irrespective of the surmised interaction partners' responses participants indicated having experienced more fun and competition in the interaction with increasing human-like features of their partners.Parametric modulation of the functional imaging data revealed a highly significant linear increase of cortical activity in the medial frontal cortex as well as in the right temporo-parietal junction in correspondence with the increase of human-likeness of the interaction partner (computer,functional robot,anthropomorphic robot,human).Conclusions/Significance: Both regions correlating with the degree of human-likeness, the medial frontal cortex and the right temporo-parietal junction, have been associated with Theory-of-Mind.The results demonstrate that the tendency to build a model of another's mind linearly increases with its perceived human-likeness.Moreover, the present data provides first evidence of a contribution of higher human cognitive functions such as ToM in direct interactions with artificial robots.Our results shed light on the long-lasting psychological and philosophical debate regarding human-machine interaction and the question of what makes humans being perceived as human.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00076512 · Cited by 8,743
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069 · cited 1×
“Therefore, the more human attributes an artificial agent displays the more it is rated as humanlike and accordingly more people attribute human qualities to the nonhuman agent [40].”
BackgroundMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 1×
“This position is supported by recent studies reporting activity increases of the most inferior region of the medPFC during perspective taking of similar others [59], while dissimilar and unknown others rather activated the dorsal and most posterior region of the medPFC [12,27].”
ResultA survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“, four categories of robotic forms can be differentiated: anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, caricatured, and functional”
BackgroundPeople thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 1×
“The neural network associated with mentalizing comprises at least two circumscribed brain regions: the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) at the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) [12], [14], [25]–[29].”
BackgroundFunctional imaging of ‘theory of mind’
Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00025-6 · Cited by 2,092
The Neural Basis of Mentalizing
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001 · Cited by 1,855
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity
Leslie, A. M. (1994) · Mapping the Mind · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511752902.006 · Cited by 1,105
The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025 · Cited by 578
Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P., & McCarthy, G. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929042947900 · Cited by 454 · cited 2×
“The TPJ contributes to processing naturalistic biological motion, human eye gaze observation [31] and plays a significant role in distinguishing self-/other-produced actions, termed agency [32–35].”
BackgroundThe precuneus and consciousness
Cavanna, A. E. (2007) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852900021295 · Cited by 363
Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative reward pathways
Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200411150-00022 · Cited by 281
Mitchell, J. P., Neil Macrae, C., & Banaji, M. R. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.031 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. T. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026 · Cited by 533
(S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots 1
EYSSEL, F., & HEGEL, F. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x · Cited by 487
Self-citationAnthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction
Fink, J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20 · Cited by 455
Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review and reference guide
Kohn, S. C., de Visser, E. J., Wiese, E., Lee, Y.-C., & Shaw, T. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., & Kircher, T.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-07-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e2597
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012676995
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.