Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol

Open access
Vang, Ole, Ahmad, Nihal, Baile, Clifton A., Baur, Joseph A., Brown, Karen, Csiszar, Anna, Das, Dipak K., Delmas, Dominique, Gottfried, Carmem, Lin, Hung-Yun, Ma, Qing-Yong, Mukhopadhyay, Partha, Nalini, Namasivayam, Pezzuto, John M., Richard, Tristan, Shukla, Yogeshwer, Surh, Young-Joon, Szekeres, Thomas, Szkudelski, Tomasz, Walle, Thomas, Wu, Joseph M.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resveratrol is a natural compound suggested to have beneficial health effects. However, people are consuming resveratrol for this reason without having the adequate scientific evidence for its effects in humans. Therefore, scientific valid recommendations concerning the human intake of resveratrol based on available published scientific data are necessary. Such recommendations were formulated after the Resveratrol 2010 conference, held in September 2010 in Helsingør, Denmark. METHODOLOGY: Literature search in databases as PUBMED and ISI Web of Science in combination with manual search was used to answer the following five questions: (1)Can resveratrol be recommended in the prevention or treatment of human diseases?; (2)Are there observed "side effects" caused by the intake of resveratrol in humans?; (3)What is the relevant dose of resveratrol?; (4)What valid data are available regarding an effect in various species of experimental animals?; (5)Which relevant (overall) mechanisms of action of resveratrol have been documented? CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The overall conclusion is that the published evidence is not sufficiently strong to justify a recommendation for the administration of resveratrol to humans, beyond the dose which can be obtained from dietary sources. On the other hand, animal data are promising in prevention of various cancer types, coronary heart diseases and diabetes which strongly indicate the need for human clinical trials. Finally, we suggest directions for future research in resveratrol regarding its mechanism of action and its safety and toxicology in human subjects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0019881

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 144 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Vang, O., Ahmad, N., Baile, C. A., Baur, J. A., Brown, K., Csiszar, A., Das, D. K., Delmas, D., Gottfried, C., Lin, H.-Y., Ma, Q.-Y., Mukhopadhyay, P., Nalini, N., Pezzuto, J. M., Richard, T., Shukla, Y., Surh, Y.-J., Szekeres, T., Szkudelski, T., Walle, T., & Wu, J. M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
e19881
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116468636
Cited by
437
References
144
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0019881
The paper
Vang, O., Ahmad, N., Baile, C. A., Baur, J. A., Brown, K., Csiszar, A., Das, D. K., Delmas, D., Gottfried, C., Lin, H.-Y., Ma, Q.-Y., Mukhopadhyay, P., Nalini, N., Pezzuto, J. M., Richard, T., Shukla, Y., Surh, Y.-J., Szekeres, T., Szkudelski, T., . . . Wu, J. M. (2011). What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.