Cited by 35Wound Healing and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsLiver physiology and pathology

Keratinocyte-Targeted Overexpression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Delays Cutaneous Wound Healing

Open access
Sanchis, Ana, Alba, Lorena, Latorre, Víctor, Sevilla, Lisa M., Pérez, Paloma·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Delayed wound healing is one of the most common secondary adverse effects associated to the therapeutic use of glucocorticoid (GC) analogs, which act through the ligand-dependent transcription factor GC-receptor (GR). GR function is exerted through DNA-binding-dependent and -independent mechanisms, classically referred to as transactivation (TA) and transrepression (TR). Currently both TA and TR are thought to contribute to the therapeutical effects mediated by GR; however their relative contribution to unwanted side effects such as delayed wound healing is unknown. We evaluated skin wound healing in transgenic mice with keratinocyte-restricted expression of either wild type GR or a mutant GR that is TA-defective but efficient in TR (K5-GR and K5-GR-TR mice, respectively). Our data show that at days (d) 4 and 8 following wounding, healing in K5-GR mice was delayed relative to WT, with reduced recruitment of granulocytes and macrophages and diminished TNF-α and IL-1β expression. TGF-β1 and Kgf expression was repressed in K5-GR skin whereas TGF-β3 was up-regulated. The re-epithelialization rate was reduced in K5-GR relative to WT, as was formation of granulation tissue. In contrast, K5-GR-TR mice showed delays in healing at d4 but re-established the skin breach at d8 concomitant with decreased repression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors relative to K5-GR mice. Keratinocytes from both transgenic mice closed in vitro wounds slower relative to WT, consistent with the in vivo defects in cell migration. Overall, the delay in the early stages of wound healing in both transgenic models is similar to that elicited by systemic treatment with dexamethasone. Wound responses in the transgenic keratinocytes correlated with reduced ERK activity both in vivo and in vitro. We conclude that the TR function of GR is sufficient for negatively regulating early stages of wound closure, while TA by GR is required for delaying later stages of healing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0029701

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keratinocyte-targeted overexpression of GRs leads to delayed re-epithelialization and granulation tissue formation, with reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines and granulocyte/macrophage infiltration.

    “keratinocyte-targeted overexpression of GRs leads to delayed re-epithelialization and granulation tissue formation, which is accompanied by reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages in the wounds [139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Barrientos S Stojadinovic O Golinko MS Brem H Tomic-Canic M 2008 Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Rep Reg 16 585 601 19128254
  2. [23]Stojadinovic O Brem H Vouthounis C Lee B Fallon J 2005 The role of β-catenin and c-myc in the inhibition of epithelialization and wound healing. Am J Pathol 167 59 69 15972952 PMC1603435

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchis, A., Alba, L., Latorre, V., Sevilla, L. M., & Pérez, P.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Pérez, Paloma
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e29701
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066238445
Cited by
35
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
glucocorticoid receptor, delayed wound healing, keratinocytes, transrepression, transcriptional activation, glucocorticoid adverse effects, re-epithelialization, granulation tissue, TGF-β1, keratinocyte growth factor, TGF-beta3, TNF-α, IL-1β, ERK signaling, dexamethasone, cell migration
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Skin, Wound Healing, Transcriptional Activation, Keratinocytes, Cytokines, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review