Cited by 309Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Giving Leads to Happiness in Young Children

Open access

Abstract

Evolutionary models of cooperation require proximate mechanisms that sustain prosociality despite inherent costs to individuals. The "warm glow" that often follows prosocial acts could provide one such mechanism; if so, these emotional benefits may be observable very early in development. Consistent with this hypothesis, the present study finds that before the age of two, toddlers exhibit greater happiness when giving treats to others than receiving treats themselves. Further, children are happier after engaging in costly giving--forfeiting their own resources--than when giving the same treat at no cost. By documenting the emotionally rewarding properties of costly prosocial behavior among toddlers, this research provides initial support for the claim that experiencing positive emotions when giving to others is a proximate mechanism for human cooperation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0039211

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–309 of 309

Metadata

Authors
Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Aknin, Lara B.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-06-14
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e39211
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081113617
Cited by
304
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
31.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
warm glow giving, prosocial behavior, happiness, toddlers, cooperation, early childhood development
MeSH terms
Altruism, Analysis of Variance, Child, Preschool, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review