Cited by 216Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Comparative Study of Human and Mouse Postsynaptic Proteomes Finds High Compositional Conservation and Abundance Differences for Key Synaptic Proteins

Open access
Bayés, Àlex, Collins, Mark O., Croning, Mike D. R., van de Lagemaat, Louie N., Choudhary, Jyoti S., Grant, Seth G. N.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Direct comparison of protein components from human and mouse excitatory synapses is important for determining the suitability of mice as models of human brain disease and to understand the evolution of the mammalian brain. The postsynaptic density is a highly complex set of proteins organized into molecular networks that play a central role in behavior and disease. We report the first direct comparison of the proteome of triplicate isolates of mouse and human cortical postsynaptic densities. The mouse postsynaptic density comprised 1556 proteins and the human one 1461. A large compositional overlap was observed; more than 70% of human postsynaptic density proteins were also observed in the mouse postsynaptic density. Quantitative analysis of postsynaptic density components in both species indicates a broadly similar profile of abundance but also shows that there is higher abundance variation between species than within species. Well known components of this synaptic structure are generally more abundant in the mouse postsynaptic density. Significant inter-species abundance differences exist in some families of key postsynaptic density proteins including glutamatergic neurotransmitter receptors and adaptor proteins. Furthermore, we have identified a closely interacting set of molecules enriched in the human postsynaptic density that could be involved in dendrite and spine structural plasticity. Understanding synapse proteome diversity within and between species will be important to further our understanding of brain complexity and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0046683

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The postsynaptic density has been extensively characterized at the protein level in humans and mice, showing key areas of overlap and divergence.

    “A particularly salient example is the synaptic signalling apparatus, more specifically the postsynaptic density (PSD), which has been extensively characterized at the protein level in humans and mice, showing key areas of overlap and divergence191,192.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayés, À., Collins, M. O., Croning, M. D. R., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Choudhary, J. S., & Grant, S. G. N.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Bayés, Àlex
  • Grant, Seth G. N.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
e46683
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093855178
Cited by
216
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (241498, 242167)
  • European Commission (221540, 241498, 242167)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
postsynaptic density, synapse proteome, human-mouse comparison, protein abundance, excitatory synapses, glutamate receptors, dendritic spine plasticity, mammalian brain evolution, cortical synapses
MeSH terms
Animals, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Cerebral Cortex, Chromatography, Gel, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Species Specificity, Synapses, Proteome, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Mice, 129 Strain, Post-Synaptic Density, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review