Cited by 204Birth, Development, and HealthGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal Diets Trigger Sex-Specific Divergent Trajectories of Gene Expression and Epigenetic Systems in Mouse Placenta

Open access

Abstract

Males and females responses to gestational overnutrition set the stage for subsequent sex-specific differences in adult onset non communicable diseases. Placenta, as a widely recognized programming agent, contibutes to the underlying processes. According to our previous findings, a high-fat diet during gestation triggers sex-specific epigenetic alterations within CpG and throughout the genome, together with the deregulation of clusters of imprinted genes. We further investigated the impact of diet and sex on placental histology, transcriptomic and epigenetic signatures in mice. Both basal gene expression and response to maternal high-fat diet were sexually dimorphic in whole placentas. Numerous genes showed sexually dimorphic expression, but only 11 genes regardless of the diet. In line with the key role of genes belonging to the sex chromosomes, 3 of these genes were Y-specific and 3 were X-specific. Amongst all the genes that were differentially expressed under a high-fat diet, only 16 genes were consistently affected in both males and females. The differences were not only quantitative but remarkably qualitative. The biological functions and networks of genes dysregulated differed markedly between the sexes. Seven genes of the epigenetic machinery were dysregulated, due to effects of diet, sex or both, including the Y- and X-linked histone demethylase paralogues Kdm5c and Kdm5d, which could mark differently male and female epigenomes. The DNA methyltransferase cofactor Dnmt3l gene expression was affected, reminiscent of our previous observation of changes in global DNA methylation. Overall, this striking sexual dimorphism of programming trajectories impose a considerable revision of the current dietary interventions protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0047986

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A plot of the RT-qPCR and microarray values. for the gene expression coefficient (log2 of ratios) for the 4 different comparisons (F HFD vs F CD, M HFD vs M CD, M CD vs F CD and M HFD vs F HFD) for 21 genes (Hsd11b1, Hsd11b2, Cxcl1, Prap1, Slc13a4, Slc22a3, Sult1e1, Tph1, Gcm1, Jarid1c, Suv39h1, Suv39h2, Dnmt3l, Maoa, C3, Pdgfß, Drd4, Vdr, Prl7a1, Gzmb, CD81). The RT-qPCR data correlated with the microarray data for most of the 84 coefficient, with a linear equation: y = 1.07x and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.775). Spearman’s test indicated that this correlation was highly significant (p<10-5).
Figure 1 A plot of the RT-qPCR and microarray values. for the gene expression coefficient (log2 of ratios) for the 4 different comparisons (F HFD vs F CD, M HFD vs M CD, M CD vs F CD and M HFD vs F HFD) for 21 genes (Hsd11b1, Hsd11b2, Cxcl1, Prap1, Slc13a4, Slc22a3, Sult1e1, Tph1, Gcm1, Jarid1c, Suv39h1, Suv39h2, Dnmt3l, Maoa, C3, Pdgfß, Drd4, Vdr, Prl7a1, Gzmb, CD81). The RT-qPCR data correlated with the microarray data for most of the 84 coefficient, with a linear equation: y = 1.07x and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.775). Spearman’s test indicated that this correlation was highly significant (p<10-5).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Venn diagram representing the number of genes in LIMMA statistical analysis. (A) displaying significant sexual dimorphism or (B) significantly dysregulated under the influence of maternal high-fat diet.
Figure 2 Venn diagram representing the number of genes in LIMMA statistical analysis. (A) displaying significant sexual dimorphism or (B) significantly dysregulated under the influence of maternal high-fat diet.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Western blotting with antibodies specific for H3K4me3 and H3K9me3. was used to determine the degree of lysine-specific methylation, in relationship with Kdm5c/5d (H3K4me3 demethylase) and Kmt1a/1b (H3K9 trimethylases). No sex- or diet-specific signal was observed.
Figure 3 Western blotting with antibodies specific for H3K4me3 and H3K9me3. was used to determine the degree of lysine-specific methylation, in relationship with Kdm5c/5d (H3K4me3 demethylase) and Kmt1a/1b (H3K9 trimethylases). No sex- or diet-specific signal was observed.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gabory, A., Ferry, L., Fajardy, I., Jouneau, L., Gothié, J.-D., Vigé, A., Fleur, C., Mayeur, S., Gallou-Kabani, C., Gross, M.-S., Attig, L., Vambergue, A., Lesage, J., Reusens, B., Vieau, D., Remacle, C., Jais, J.-P., & Junien, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Junien, Claudine
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-11-05
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
e47986
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160171719
Cited by
204
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 26
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-06-PNRA-0022)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
placenta, maternal high-fat diet, sex differences, epigenetics, DNA methylation, imprinted genes, placental transcriptome, KDM5C, KDM5D, DNMT3L, sex chromosomes, developmental programming, non-communicable diseases, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Female, Male, Oxidoreductases, N-Demethylating, Placenta, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Characteristics, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Histone Demethylases, Diet, High-Fat, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review