Cited by 28Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The Effect of Ratio and Interval Training on Pavlovian-Instrumental Transfer in Mice

Open access
Wiltgen, Brian J., Sinclair, Courtney, Lane, Chadrick, Barrows, Frank, Molina, Martín, Chabanon-Hicks, Chloe·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Conditional stimuli (CS) that are paired with reward can be used to motivate instrumental responses. This process is called Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT). A recent study in rats suggested that habitual responses are particularly sensitive to the motivational effects of reward cues. The current experiments examined this idea using ratio and interval training in mice. Two groups of animals were trained to lever press for food pellets that were delivered on random ratio or random interval schedules. Devaluation tests revealed that interval training led to habitual responding while ratio training produced goal-directed actions. The presentation of CSs paired with reward led to positive transfer in both groups, however, the size of this effect was much larger in mice that were trained on interval schedules. This result suggests that habitual responses are more sensitive to the motivational influence of reward cues than goal-directed actions. The implications for neurobiological models of motivation and drug seeking behaviors are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0048227

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiltgen, B. J., Sinclair, C., Lane, C., Barrows, F., Molina, M., & Chabanon-Hicks, C.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Wiltgen, Brian J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-10-29
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
e48227
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987327953
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03da029165-01)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA029165-01, R03 DA029165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer, ratio schedules, interval schedules, currency devaluation, habitual responding, goal-directed behavior, reward cues, motivation, drug-seeking behavior, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Food, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Motivation, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors, Transfer, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review