The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microgravity Induces Pelvic Bone Loss through Osteoclastic Activity, Osteocytic Osteolysis, and Osteoblastic Cell Cycle Inhibition by CDKN1a/p21
Open accessAbstract
Bone is a dynamically remodeled tissue that requires gravity-mediated mechanical stimulation for maintenance of mineral content and structure. Homeostasis in bone occurs through a balance in the activities and signaling of osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes, as well as proliferation and differentiation of their stem cell progenitors. Microgravity and unloading are known to cause osteoclast-mediated bone resorption; however, we hypothesize that osteocytic osteolysis, and cell cycle arrest during osteogenesis may also contribute to bone loss in space. To test this possibility, we exposed 16-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (n = 8) to microgravity for 15-days on the STS-131 space shuttle mission. Analysis of the pelvis by µCT shows decreases in bone volume fraction (BV/TV) of 6.29%, and bone thickness of 11.91%. TRAP-positive osteoclast-covered trabecular bone surfaces also increased in microgravity by 170% (p = 0.004), indicating osteoclastic bone degeneration. High-resolution X-ray nanoCT studies revealed signs of lacunar osteolysis, including increases in cross-sectional area (+17%, p = 0.022), perimeter (+14%, p = 0.008), and canalicular diameter (+6%, p = 0.037). Expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1, 3, and 10 in bone, as measured by RT-qPCR, was also up-regulated in microgravity (+12.94, +2.98 and +16.85 fold respectively, p<0.01), with MMP10 localized to osteocytes, and consistent with induction of osteocytic osteolysis. Furthermore, expression of CDKN1a/p21 in bone increased 3.31 fold (p<0.01), and was localized to osteoblasts, possibly inhibiting the cell cycle during tissue regeneration as well as conferring apoptosis resistance to these cells. Finally the apoptosis inducer Trp53 was down-regulated by -1.54 fold (p<0.01), possibly associated with the quiescent survival-promoting function of CDKN1a/p21. In conclusion, our findings identify the pelvic and femoral region of the mouse skeleton as an active site of rapid bone loss in microgravity, and indicate that this loss is not limited to osteoclastic degradation. Therefore, this study offers new evidence for microgravity-induced osteocytic osteolysis, and CDKN1a/p21-mediated osteogenic cell cycle arrest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
![Figure 1 Micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) Analysis of Spaceflown Ischium. The ischium of the pelvis, shown in orange (A), was analyzed using μCT (720 slices = 4.89 mm). The anatomical markers used for μCT analysis were (1) caudal apex of obturator foramen, (2) dorsal-most point of the ventral ramus of ischium, and (3) the ischial tuberosity (A) (For full details on anatomical markers see [74]). The ischial cross-sectional geometry (B) was analyzed by length (a), the width at the midpoint (b) and at 1/3 distance from the obturator foramen (c); and the bend angle (d). Flight samples (D) exhibited a more open cross-sectional geometry compared to the ground control (C), indicating a possible reduction in the pull force applied to the bone. Ground control samples (F) also exhibited greater thickness (orange/red) then the flight samples (G), indicating a reduction in overall bone thickness in spaceflight samples.](/paper-figures/f1a9de33f01a4f89b8b4cc0f632ce93a/microgravity-induces-pelvic-bone-loss-through-osteoclastic-activity-osteocytic-figure-1.jpg)





Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“They also documented osteocyte apoptosis as reflected by increases in lacunar and canalicular diameters [60].”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“They found that microgravity reduced the bone volume by 6.3% and bone thickness by 11.9% and increased the number of bone-surface TRAP-positive osteoclasts by 170% compared to that of ground controls, indicating enhanced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption.”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“conditions of microgravity and simulated microgravity decrease the mineral content and cortical and trabecular microstructures of bone”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“decrease osteoblastogenesis and osteoblast secretion of OPG”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“increase osteoclast differentiation, fusion, and expression of regulatory and osteoclast-specific genes”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“increase osteoclast secretion of sclerostin”
From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vogelstein, B. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90421-8 · Cited by 1,849
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling
Raggatt, L. J., & Partridge, N. C. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r109.041087 · Cited by 1,402
Correlation of Terminal Cell Cycle Arrest of Skeletal Muscle with Induction of p21 by MyoD
Halevy, O., Novitch, B. G., Spicer, D. B., Skapek, S. X., Rhee, J., Hannon, G. J., Beach, D., & Lassar, A. B. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7863327 · Cited by 1,139
Matrix metalloproteinases: a tail of a frog that became a prince
Brinckerhoff, C., & Matrisian, L. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm763 · Cited by 1,112
Vico, L., Collet, P., Guignandon, A., Lafage-Proust, M.-H., Thomas, T., Rehailia, M., & Alexandre, C. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02217-0 · Cited by 821
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in health and disease: an overview
Malemud, C. (2006) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/1915 · Cited by 705
The cell biology of bone metabolism
Datta, H. K., Ng, W. F., Walker, J. A., Tuck, S. P., & Varanasi, S. S. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.048868 · Cited by 614
Yoshihara, Y., Nakamura, H., Obata, K., Yamada, H., Hayakawa, T., Fujikawa, K., & Okada, Y. (2000) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.59.6.455 · Cited by 566
Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes
Klein-Nulend, J., Bakker, A. D., Bacabac, R. G., Vatsa, A., & Weinbaum, S. (2013) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.013 · Cited by 528
Ge, C., Xiao, G., Jiang, D., & Franceschi, R. T. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200610046 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robling, A. G., & Bonewald, L. F. (2020) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034332 · Cited by 539
The impact of microgravity on bone in humans
Grimm, D. G., Grosse, J., Wehland, M., Mann, V., Reseland, J. E., Sundaresan, A., & Corydon, T. J. (2016) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.057 · Cited by 283
Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight
Vico, L., & Hargens, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2018.37 · Cited by 236
Update on the effects of microgravity on the musculoskeletal system
Juhl, O. J., Buettmann, E. G., Friedman, M. A., DeNapoli, R. C., Hoppock, G. A., & Donahue, H. J. (2021) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-021-00158-4 · Cited by 204
The effects of microgravity on bone structure and function
Man, J., Graham, T., Squires-Donelly, G., & Laslett, A. L. (2022) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-022-00194-8 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaber, E. A., Dvorochkin, N., Lee, C., Alwood, J. S., Yousuf, R., Pianetta, P., Globus, R. K., Burns, B. P., & Almeida, E. A. C.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Almeida, Eduardo A. C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-04-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e61372
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3630201
- OpenAlex
- W2142491318
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Keywords
- microgravity, spaceflight, bone loss, osteoclasts, osteoblasts, CDKN1A/p21, Trp53, matrix metalloproteinases, osteocytes, bone resorption, trabecular bone, bone unloading, female mice, bone homeostasis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Resorption, Female, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Osteoclasts, Osteocytes, Osteolysis, Pelvic Bones, Weightlessness, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Mice, X-Ray Microtomography, Cell Cycle Checkpoints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review