Cited by 104Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsOral and gingival health research

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in Different Periodontal Conditions

Open access
Silva-Boghossian, Carina M., Colombo, Ana Paula V., Tanaka, Marcia, Rayo, Carolina, Xiao, Yizhi, Siqueira, Walter L.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

AIM: To quantify the proteome composition of the GCF in periodontal health (HH) and in sites with different clinical conditions in chronic periodontitis (CP) subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 5 subjects with HH and 5 with CP were submitted to full-mouth periodontal examination, and GCF sampling. Sites in the CP group were classified and sampled as periodontitis (P, probing depth, PD>4 mm), gingivitis (G, PD≤3 mm with bleeding on probing, BOP), and healthy sites (H, PD≤3 mm without BOP). GCF proteins were subjected to liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for identification, characterization and quantification. RESULTS: 230 proteins were identified; 145 proteins were detected in HH, 214 in P, 154 in G, and 133 in H. Four proteins were exclusively detected at HH, 43 proteins at P, 7 proteins at G, and 1 protein at H. Compared to HH group, 35 and 6 proteins were more abundant in P and G (p<0.001), respectively; and 4, 15 and 37 proteins were less abundant in P, G and H (p≤0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are marked differences in the GCF proteome according to disease profile. Comprehension of the role of the identified proteins in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal disease may lead to biomarkers definition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0075898

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culture-independent methods have improved our understanding of microbial diversity in the oral cavity.

    “Culture‐independent methods have improved our understanding of microbial diversity in the oral cavity.”
  • Proteomic applications have been applied to understand changes in the proteome that diverge states of periodontal health from disease and to further characterize various periodontal disease states, including gingivitis, mild, moderate, chronic, and aggressive periodontitis.

    “Proteomic applications have been applied to understand changes in the proteome that diverge states of periodontal health from disease and to further characterize various periodontal disease states, including gingivitis, mild, moderate, chronic, and aggressive periodontitis.70, 101, 102, 103, 104”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Siqueira WL, Bakkal M, Xiao Y, Sutton JN, Mendes FM (2012) Quantitative proteomic analysis of the effect of fluoride on the acquired enamel pellicle. PLOS ONE 7: e42204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042204. PubMed: 22870302. 22870302 PMC3411614 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva-Boghossian, C. M., Colombo, A. P. V., Tanaka, M., Rayo, C., Xiao, Y., & Siqueira, W. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Siqueira, Walter L.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e75898
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965316932
Cited by
104
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (25116, 113166, 106657, 97577)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (#371813, 113166)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
Keywords
gingival crevicular fluid, proteome, chronic periodontitis, gingivitis, periodontal health, periodontal biomarkers, protein abundance
MeSH terms
Female, Gingival Crevicular Fluid, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Proteomics, Chronic Periodontitis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review