CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 162Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sweetened Beverages, Coffee, and Tea and Depression Risk among Older US Adults

Open access
Guo, Xuguang, Park, Yikyung, Freedman, Neal D., Sinha, Rashmi, Hollenbeck, Albert R., Blair, Aaron, Chen, Honglei·2014·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094715PMC PMC3990543
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Sweetened beverages, coffee, and tea are the most consumed non-alcoholic beverages and may have important health consequences. We prospectively evaluated the consumption of various types of beverages assessed in 1995-1996 in relation to self-reported depression diagnosis after 2000 among 263,923 participants of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived from multivariate logistic regressions. The OR (95% CI) comparing ≥4 cans/cups per day with none were 1.30 (95%CI: 1.17-1.44) for soft drinks, 1.38 (1.15-1.65) for fruit drinks, and 0.91 (0.84-0.98) for coffee (all P for trend<0.0001). Null associations were observed for iced-tea and hot tea. In stratified analyses by drinkers of primarily diet versus regular beverages, the ORs were 1.31 (1.16-1.47) for diet versus 1.22 (1.03-1.45) for regular soft drinks, 1.51 (1.18-1.92) for diet versus 1.08 (0.79-1.46) for regular fruit drinks, and 1.25 (1.10-1.41) for diet versus 0.94 (0.83-1.08) for regular sweetened iced-tea. Finally, compared to nondrinkers, drinking coffee or tea without any sweetener was associated with a lower risk for depression, adding artificial sweeteners, but not sugar or honey, was associated with higher risks. Frequent consumption of sweetened beverages, especially diet drinks, may increase depression risk among older adults, whereas coffee consumption may lower the risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0094715

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Guo, X., Park, Y., Freedman, N. D., Sinha, R., Hollenbeck, A. R., Blair, A., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • AARP (US)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Honglei
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e94715
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0094715
PMC
PMC3990543
OpenAlex
W2108716947
Cited by
161
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
sweetened beverages, coffee, tea, depression risk, older adults, soft drinks, fruit beverages, artificial sweeteners, sugar, honey, non-alcoholic beverages
MeSH terms
Coffee, Depression, Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Sweetening Agents, Tea, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review