Cited by 85Sleep and related disordersCoffee research and impactsMental Health Research Topics

Caffeine consumption, sleep, and affect in the natural environments of depressed youth and healthy controls

Open access
Whalen, D. J., Silk, J. S., Semel, M., Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Axelson, D. A., Birmaher, B., Dahl, R. E.·2007·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sleep problems are a cardinal symptom of depression in children and adolescents and caffeine use is a prevalent and problematic issue in youth; yet little is known about caffeine use and its effects on sleep in youth with depression. We examined caffeine use and its relation to sleep and affect in youth's natural environments. METHODS: Thirty youth with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 23 control youth reported on caffeine use, sleep, and affect in their natural environment using ecological momentary assessment at baseline and over 8 weeks, while MDD youth received treatment. RESULTS: Youth with MDD reported more caffeine use and sleep problems relative to healthy youth. Youth with MDD reported more anxiety on days they consumed caffeine. Caffeine use among youth with MDD decreased across treatment, but sleep complaints remained elevated. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that both sleep quality and caffeine use are altered in pediatric depression; that caffeine use, but not sleep problems, improves with treatment; and that caffeine may exacerbate daily anxiety among youth with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm086

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whalen, D. J., Silk, J. S., Semel, M., Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Axelson, D. A., Birmaher, B., & Dahl, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
358-367
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2111533238
Cited by
85
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH041712, MH-41712, K01MH073077)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024144)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
caffeine consumption, sleep disorders, affect, childhood depression, major depressive disorder, anxiety, adolescents, children, sleep quality, naturalistic assessment, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Beverages, Caffeine, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroencephalography, Environment, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Wake Disorders, Citalopram, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review