The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CCTop: An Intuitive, Flexible and Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Target Prediction Tool
Open accessAbstract
Engineering of the CRISPR/Cas9 system has opened a plethora of new opportunities for site-directed mutagenesis and targeted genome modification. Fundamental to this is a stretch of twenty nucleotides at the 5' end of a guide RNA that provides specificity to the bound Cas9 endonuclease. Since a sequence of twenty nucleotides can occur multiple times in a given genome and some mismatches seem to be accepted by the CRISPR/Cas9 complex, an efficient and reliable in silico selection and evaluation of the targeting site is key prerequisite for the experimental success. Here we present the CRISPR/Cas9 target online predictor (CCTop, http://crispr.cos.uni-heidelberg.de) to overcome limitations of already available tools. CCTop provides an intuitive user interface with reasonable default parameters that can easily be tuned by the user. From a given query sequence, CCTop identifies and ranks all candidate sgRNA target sites according to their off-target quality and displays full documentation. CCTop was experimentally validated for gene inactivation, non-homologous end-joining as well as homology directed repair. Thus, CCTop provides the bench biologist with a tool for the rapid and efficient identification of high quality target sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“CCTop and CROP-IT generate scores based on the distances of the mismatches to the PAM (Singh et al., 2015; Stemmer et al., 2015).”
From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Stemmer et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
The Human Genome Browser at UCSC
Kent, W. J., Sugnet, C. W., Furey, T. S., Roskin, K. M., Pringle, T. H., Zahler, A. M., & Haussler, A. D. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229102 · Cited by 10,400
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases
Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S., & Gregory, P. D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2842 · Cited by 2,285
A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing
Miller, J. C., Tan, S., Qiao, G., Barlow, K. A., Wang, J., Xia, D. F., Meng, X., Paschon, D. E., Leung, E., Hinkley, S. J., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1755 · Cited by 2,098
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Gain-of-function IKBKB mutation causes human combined immune deficiency
Cardinez, C., Miraghazadeh, B., Tanita, K., da Silva, E., Hoshino, A., Okada, S., Chand, R., Asano, T., Tsumura, M., Yoshida, K., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20180639 · Cited by 95
Vonk, P. J., Escobar, N., Wösten, H. A. B., Lugones, L. G., & Ohm, R. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44133-2 · Cited by 92
Zhang, Z., Jiang, J., He, Y., Cai, J., Xie, J., Wu, M., Xing, M., Zhang, Z., Chang, H., Yu, P., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02596-7 · Cited by 93
Targeting miRNA by CRISPR/Cas in cancer: advantages and challenges
Hussen, B. M., Rasul, M. F., Abdullah, S. R., Hidayat, H. J., Faraj, G. S. H., Ali, F. A., Salihi, A. B., Baniahmad, A., Ghafouri‐Fard, S., Rahman, M., et al. (2023) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-023-00468-6 · Cited by 106
Kostyushev, D. S., Brezgin, S., Kostyusheva, A., Zarifyan, D., Goptar, I. A., & Chulanov, V. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03021-8 · Cited by 90
CRISPR/Cas9: Transcending the Reality of Genome Editing
Chira, S., Gulei, D., Hajitou, A., Zimța, A., Cordelier, P., & Berindan‐Neagoe, I. (2017) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2017.04.001 · Cited by 89
Eggers, E.-J., van der Burgt, A., van Heusden, A. W., de Vries, M. E., Visser, R. G. F., Bachem, C., & Lindhout, P. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24267-6 · Cited by 87
Sapozhnikov, D. M., & Szyf, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25991-9 · Cited by 83
Letelier, J., de la Calle‐Mustienes, E., Pieretti, J., Naranjo, S., Maeso, I., Nakamura, T., Pascual‐Anaya, J., Shubin, N. H., Schneider, I., Martínez‐Morales, J. R., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0080-5 · Cited by 87
Alkhnbashi, O. S., Meier, T., Mitrofanov, A., Backofen, R., & Voß, B. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.013 · Cited by 88
Integrated design, execution, and analysis of arrayed and pooled CRISPR genome-editing experiments
Canver, M. C., Haeussler, M., Bauer, D. E., Orkin, S. H., Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O., Yuan, G., Zhang, F., Concordet, J., & Pinello, L. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2018.005 · Cited by 91
Ansai, S., Hosokawa, H., Maegawa, S., & Kinoshita, M. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.050 · Cited by 86
Plant–pathogen interactions: toward development of next-generation disease-resistant plants
Nejat, N., Rookes, J. E., Mantri, N. L., & Cahill, D. M. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1134437 · Cited by 86
Genome-wide CRISPR off-target prediction and optimization using RNA-DNA interaction fingerprints
Chen, Q., Chuai, G., Zhang, H., Tang, J., Duan, L., Guan, H., Li, W., Li, W., Wen, J., Zuo, E., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42695-4 · Cited by 89
Rahman, M. K., & Rahman, M. S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181943 · Cited by 79
Are the current gRNA ranking prediction algorithms useful for genome editing in plants?
Naim, F., Shand, K., Hayashi, S., O’Brien, M., McGree, J. M., Johnson, A. A. T., Dugdale, B., & Waterhouse, P. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227994 · Cited by 79
Chen, Z., Yu, H., Shi, X. D., Warren, C. R., Lotta, L. A., Friesen, M., Meissner, T. B., Langenberg, C., Wabitsch, M., Wareham, N. J., et al. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.119.315246 · Cited by 77
FANCM regulates repair pathway choice at stalled replication forks
Panday, A., Willis, N. A., Elango, R., Menghi, F., Duffey, E. E., Liu, E. T., & Scully, R. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.044 · Cited by 75
Xu, X., Duan, D., & Chen, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00180-1 · Cited by 79
Germ cells in the teleost fish medaka have an inherent feminizing effect
Nishimura, T., Yamada, K., Fujimori, C., Kikuchi, M., Kawasaki, T., Siegfried, K. R., Sakai, N., & Tanaka, M. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007259 · Cited by 77
Development and Application of CRISPR/Cas in Microbial Biotechnology
Ding, W., Zhang, Y., & Shi, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00711 · Cited by 81
Suppression of proteolipid protein rescues Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease
Elitt, M. S., Barbar, L., Shick, H. E., Powers, B. E., Maeno-Hikichi, Y., Madhavan, M., Allan, K. C., Nawash, B. S., Gevorgyan, A. S., Hung, S., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2494-3 · Cited by 80
Reimer, J., Knöß, S., Labuhn, M., Charpentier, E., Göhring, G., Schlegelberger, B., Klusmann, J., & Heckl, D. (2017) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.164046 · Cited by 75
Huang, L., Hua, Z., Xiao, H., Cheng, Y., Xu, K., Gao, Q., Xia, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, X., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17154 · Cited by 73
Ludman, M., Burgyán, J., & Fátyol, K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01050-6 · Cited by 77
DNA-free genome editing methods for targeted crop improvement
Kanchiswamy, C. N. (2016) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1982-2 · Cited by 76
Scaf1 promotes respiratory supercomplexes and metabolic efficiency in zebrafish
García‐Poyatos, C., Cogliati, S., Calvo, E., Hernansanz‐Agustín, P., Lagarrigue, S., Magni, R., Botos, M. A., Langa, X., Amati, F., Vázquez, J., et al. (2020) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202050287 · Cited by 66
Uniyal, A. P., Mansotra, K., Yadav, S. K., & Kumar, V. S. (2019) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-019-1760-2 · Cited by 70
Tran, M. T. N., Khalid, M. K. N. M., Wang, Q., Walker, J. K. R., Lidgerwood, G. E., Dilworth, K. L., Lisowski, L., Pébay, A., & Hewitt, A. W. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18715-y · Cited by 70
Live-cell imaging of circadian clock protein dynamics in CRISPR-generated knock-in cells
Gabriel, C. H., del Olmo, M., Zehtabian, A., Jäger, M., Reischl, S., van Dijk, H., Ulbricht, C., Rakhymzhan, A. A., Korte, T., Koller, B., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24086-9 · Cited by 72
Large chromosomal segment deletions by CRISPR/LbCpf1‐mediated multiplex gene editing in soybean
Duan, K., Cheng, Y., Ji, J., Wang, C., Wei, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13158 · Cited by 69
Le, H., Nguyen, N. H. A., Ta, D. T., Le, T. N. T., Bui, T. P., Le, N. T., Nguyen, C. X., Rolletschek, H., Stacey, G. S., Stacey, M. G., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.612942 · Cited by 68
Non-viral chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells going viral
Balke‐Want, H., Keerthi, V., Cadiñanos-Garai, A., Fowler, C., Gkitsas-Long, N., Brown, A. K., Tunuguntla, R. H., Abou‐El‐Enein, M., & Feldman, S. A. (2023) · Immuno-Oncology Technology · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2023.100375 · Cited by 75
Bhowmik, P., Yan, W., Hodgins, C. L., Polley, B., Warkentin, T., Nickerson, M. T., Ro, D., Marsolais, F., Domoney, C., Shariati‐Ievari, S., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1246905 · Cited by 69
Fine-Tuning Next-Generation Genome Editing Tools
Kanchiswamy, C. N., Maffei, M. E., Malnoy, M., Velasco, R., & Kim, J. (2016) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.007 · Cited by 70
Graham, D. B., Lefkovith, A. J., Deelen, P., de Klein, N., Varma, M., Boroughs, A. C., Desch, A. N., Ng, A., Guzman, G., Schenone, M., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.042 · Cited by 65
Zhang, S., Plummer, D., Lu, L., Cui, J., Xu, W., Wang, M., Liu, X., Prabhakar, N., Shrinet, J., Srinivasan, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01116-w · Cited by 63
He, L., Chen, Q., Wang, L., Pu, Y., Huang, J., Cheng, C. K., Luo, J., Kang, L., Lin, X., Li, X., et al. (2024) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2024.103229 · Cited by 69
Naert, T., Colpaert, R. M. W., Nieuwenhuysen, T. V., Dimitrakopoulou, D., Leœn, J., Haustraete, J., Boel, A., Steyaert, W., Lepez, T., Deforce, D. L. D., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep35264 · Cited by 67
A transient reporter for editing enrichment (TREE) in human cells
Standage-Beier, K., Tekel, S. J., Brookhouser, N., Schwarz, G., Nguyen, T., Wang, X., & Brafman, D. A. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz713 · Cited by 66
Hoberecht, L., Perampalam, P., Lun, A. T. L., & Fortin, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34320-7 · Cited by 66
High-Efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) Embryos
Hu, X. F., Zhang, B., Liao, C., & Zeng, Z. J. (2019) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.119.400130 · Cited by 68
Optimized knock-in of point mutations in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9
Prykhozhij, S. V., Fuller, C. J., Steele, S. L., Veinotte, C. J., Razaghi, B., Robitaille, J. M., McMaster, C. R., Shlien, A., Malkin, D. M., & Berman, J. N. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky674 · Cited by 70
Absence of carbonic anhydrase in chloroplasts affects C 3 plant development but not photosynthesis
Hines, K. M., Chaudhari, V. R., Edgeworth, K. N., Owens, T. G., & Hanson, M. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2107425118 · Cited by 65
Unified energetics analysis unravels SpCas9 cleavage activity for optimal gRNA design
Zhang, D., Hurst, T., Duan, D., & Chen, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820523116 · Cited by 63
Gomez‐Giro, G., Arias, J., Jarazo, J., Zeuschner, D., Ali, M., Possemis, N., Bolognin, S., Halder, R., Jäger, C., Kuper, W. F. E., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0871-7 · Cited by 69
CRISPR-based transcriptional activation tool for silent genes in filamentous fungi
Mózsik, L., Hoekzema, M., de Kok, N. A. W., Bovenberg, R. A. L., Nygård, Y., & Driessen, A. J. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80864-3 · Cited by 68
Dynamics of in vivo ASC speck formation
Kuri, P., Schieber, N. L., Thumberger, T., Wittbrodt, J., Schwab, Y., & Leptin, M. (2017) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201703103 · Cited by 69
Self-citationDelcourt, V., Brunelle, M., Roy, A. V., Jacques, J., Salzet, M., Fournier, I., & Roucou, X. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.ra118.000593 · Cited by 70
Optimized knock-in of point mutations in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9
Prykhozhij, S. V., Fuller, C. J., Steele, S. L., Veinotte, C. J., Razaghi, B., Robitaille, J. M., McMaster, C. R., Shlien, A., Malkin, D. M., & Berman, J. N. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky512 · Cited by 63
Nasri, M., Ritter, M. U., Mir, P., Dannenmann, B., Aghaallaei, N., Amend, D., Makaryan, V., Xu, Y., Fletcher, B., Bernhard, R., et al. (2019) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.221804 · Cited by 63
Extracellular LGALS3BP regulates neural progenitor position and relates to human cortical complexity
Kyrousi, C., O’Neill, A. C., Brazovskaja, A., He, Z., Kielkowski, P., Coquand, L., Giaimo, R. D., Andrea, P. D., Belka, A., Forero, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26447-w · Cited by 62
CRISPR nuclease off-target activity and mitigation strategies
Wienert, B., & Cromer, M. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.1050507 · Cited by 66
Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Can It Get Any Better?
Haeussler, M., & Concordet, J. (2016) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.008 · Cited by 65
Therapeutic Genome Editing for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Using CRISPR/Cas9
Wang, Y., Hao, L., Wang, H., Santostefano, K. E., Thapa, A., Cleary, J., Li, H. Z., Guo, X., Terada, N., Ashizawa, T., et al. (2018) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.09.003 · Cited by 61
Efficient Generation of Endogenous Fluorescent Reporters by Nested CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans
Vicencio, J., Martínez-Fernández, C., Serrat, X., & Cerón, J. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.301965 · Cited by 54
ECE2 regulates neurogenesis and neuronal migration during human cortical development
Buchsbaum, I. Y., Kielkowski, P., Giorgio, G., O’Neill, A. C., Giaimo, R. D., Kyrousi, C., Khattak, S., Sieber, S. A., Robertson, S. P., & Cappello, S. (2020) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201948204 · Cited by 61
Zhou, H., Bai, S., Wang, N., Sun, X., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J. Z., & Dong, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.575477 · Cited by 61
Nakamoto, M., Uchino, T., Koshimizu, E., Kuchiishi, Y., Sekiguchi, R., Wang, L., Sudo, R., Endo, M., Guiguen, Y., Schartl, M., et al. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009705 · Cited by 60
Han, S., Herrmann, A., Yang, J., Iwasaki, R., Sakamoto, T., Desvoyes, B., Kimura, S., Gutiérrez, C., Kim, E., & Torii, K. U. (2022) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2022.01.014 · Cited by 58
Marx, N., Grünwald‐Gruber, C., Bydlinski, N., Dhiman, H., Ly, N. N., Klanert, G., & Borth, N. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700217 · Cited by 57
Advances in Genome Editing and Application to the Generation of Genetically Modified Rat Models
Chenouard, V., Remy, S., Tesson, L., Ménoret, S., Ouisse, L.-H., Cherifi, Y., & Anegon, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.615491 · Cited by 57
Peng, S., Guo, D., Guo, Y., Zhao, H., Mei, J., Han, Y., Guan, R., Wang, T., Song, T., Sun, K., et al. (2022) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac037 · Cited by 57
Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Wefers, B., Bashir, S., Rossius, J., Wurst, W., & Kühn, R. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.02.008 · Cited by 60
The Conspicuity of CRISPR-Cpf1 System as a Significant Breakthrough in Genome Editing
Bayat, H., Modarressi, M. H., & Rahimpour, A. (2017) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-017-1406-8 · Cited by 56
SNP-CRISPR: A Web Tool for SNP-Specific Genome Editing
Chen, C., Rodiger, J., Chung, V., Viswanatha, R., Mohr, S. E., Hu, Y., & Perrimon, N. (2019) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.119.400904 · Cited by 57
UBB pseudogene 4 encodes functional ubiquitin variants
Dubois, M., Meller, A., Samandi, S., Brunelle, M., Frion, J., Brunet, M. A., Toupin, A., Beaudoin, M. C., Jacques, J., Lévesque, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15090-6 · Cited by 58
Goudeau, J. F., Sharp, C. S., Paw, J. S., Savy, L., Leonetti, M. D., York, A. G., Updike, D. L., Kenyon, C. J., & Ingaramo, M. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab014 · Cited by 47
Current Advancements and Limitations of Gene Editing in Orphan Crops
Venezia, M., & Krainer, K. M. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.742932 · Cited by 58
NIX-Mediated Mitophagy Promotes Effector Memory Formation in Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells
Gupta, S. S., Sharp, R., Hofferek, C. J., Kuai, L., Dorn, G. W., Wang, J., & Chen, M. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.032 · Cited by 56
Lee, J., Sheen, J. H., Lim, O., Lee, Y. J., Ryu, J., Shin, D., Kim, Y. Y., & Kim, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74772-9 · Cited by 54
Duy, P. N., Lan, D. T., Thu, H. P., Thu, H. P. T., Thanh, H. N., Pham, N. P., Auguy, F., Thu, H. B. T., Manh, T. B., Cunnac, S., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255470 · Cited by 54
Charlier, J., Nadon, R., & Makarenkov, V. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab112 · Cited by 59
CRISPR-DIPOFF: an interpretable deep learning approach for CRISPR Cas-9 off-target prediction
Toufikuzzaman, M., Samee, M. A. H., & Rahman, M. S. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad530 · Cited by 60
Peng, H., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Z., Liu, T., & Li, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty558 · Cited by 57
Li, Y., Lou, W., Raja, V., Denis, S. W., Yu, W., Schmidtke, M. W., Reynolds, C. A., Schlame, M., Houtkooper, R. H., & Greenberg, M. L. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.009037 · Cited by 53
AQP8 is a crucial H2O2 transporter in insulin-producing RINm5F cells
Krüger, C., Waldeck‐Weiermair, M., Kaynert, J. T., Pokrant, T., Komaragiri, Y., Otto, O., Michel, T. M., & Elsner, M. (2021) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.101962 · Cited by 52
Transcriptomic neuron types vary topographically in function and morphology
Shainer, I., Kappel, J. M., Laurell, E., Donovan, J. C., Schneider, M., Kuehn, E., Arnold-Ammer, I., Stemmer, M., Larsch, J., & Baier, H. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08518-2 · Cited by 56
Self-citationEvolution of a guarded decoy protease and its receptor in solanaceous plants
Kourelis, J., Malik, S., Mattinson, O., Krauter, S., Kahlon, P. S., Paulus, J. K., & van der Hoorn, R. A. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18069-5 · Cited by 50
Jiang, L., Liang, J., Huang, W. C., Ma, J., Park, K. H., Wu, Z., Chen, P., Hua Zhu, C., Ma, J., Cai, W., et al. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.10.015 · Cited by 51
CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing—Can It Become a Game Changer in Future Fisheries Sector?
Roy, S., Kumar, V., Behera, B. K., Parhi, J., Mohapatra, S., Chakraborty, T., & Das, B. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.924475 · Cited by 55
Wang, Q., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Ke, Z., Li, C., Yu, X., Chen, S., & Guo, D. (2018) · Virus Research · doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2018.04.002 · Cited by 49
A Y-chromosome shredding gene drive for controlling pest vertebrate populations
Prowse, T. A. A., Adikusuma, F., Cassey, P., Thomas, P. Q., & Ross, J. V. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41873 · Cited by 50
Bioinformatics for Marine Products: An Overview of Resources, Bottlenecks, and Perspectives
Ambrosino, L., Tangherlini, M., Colantuono, C., Esposito, A., Sangiovanni, M., Miralto, M., Sansone, C., & Chiusano, M. L. (2019) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md17100576 · Cited by 53
Simkin, D., Marshall, K. A., Vanoye, C. G., Desai, R. R., Bustos, B. I., Piyevsky, B. N., Ortega, J. A., Forrest, M. P., Robertson, G. L., Penzes, P., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64434 · Cited by 51
Barber, J. N., Sezmis, A. L., Woods, L. C., Anderson, T. D., Voss, J. M., & McDonald, M. J. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-020-00810-z · Cited by 50
Sufyan, M., Daraz, U., Hyder, S., Zulfiqar, U., Iqbal, R., Eldin, S. M., Rafiq, F., Mahmood, N., Shahzad, K., Uzair, M., et al. (2023) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-023-01036-w · Cited by 55
Antisense Oligonucleotide Mediated Splice Correction of a Deep Intronic Mutation in OPA1
Bonifert, T., González-Menéndez, I., Battke, F., Theurer, Y., Synofzik, M., Schöls, L. J., & Wissinger, B. (2016) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2016.93 · Cited by 50
Evaluation of CRISPR gene-editing tools in zebrafish
Uribe‐Salazar, J. M., Kaya, G., Sekar, A., Weyenberg, K., Ingamells, C., & Dennis, M. Y. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-021-08238-1 · Cited by 57
Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas mediated genome editing for crop improvement
Sharma, S., Kaur, R., & Singh, A. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-017-0446-7 · Cited by 49
Castañeda-Cortés, D. C., Padilla, L. F. A., Langlois, V. S., Somoza, G. M., & Fernandino, J. I. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.172866 · Cited by 49
Watzlawick, H., & Altenbuchner, J. (2019) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-019-0884-4 · Cited by 49
A Novel Hybrid CNN-SVR for CRISPR/Cas9 Guide RNA Activity Prediction
Zhang, G., Dai, Z., & Dai, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01303 · Cited by 52
Ambrosino, L., Colantuono, C., Diretto, G., Fiore, A., & Chiusano, M. L. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9050591 · Cited by 49
Afzal, S., Sirohi, P., & Singh, N. K. (2020) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-020-02950-w · Cited by 51
Design of Guide RNA for CRISPR/Cas Plant Genome Editing
Геращенков, Г. А., Rozhnova, N. A., Кулуев, Б. Р., Kiryanova, O. Y., Гумерова, Г. Р., Knyazev, A. V., Vershinina, Z. R., Mikhailova, E. V., Chemeris, D. A., Matniyazov, R. T., et al. (2020) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.1134/s0026893320010069 · Cited by 49
Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9
Agarwal, A., Yadava, P., Kumar, K., Singh, I., Kaul, T., Pattanayak, A., & Agrawal, P. K. (2018) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-017-0502-3 · Cited by 48
Targeting the MIF/CXCR7/AKT Signaling Pathway in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Rafiei, S., Gui, B., Wu, J., Liu, X. S., Kibel, A. S., & Li, J. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-18-0412 · Cited by 48
O’Brien, A. R., Wilson, L. O. W., Burgio, G., & Bauer, D. C. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39142-0 · Cited by 48
Cirzi, C., Dyckow, J., Legrand, C., Schott, J., Guo, W., Pérez-Hernández, D., Hisaoka, M., Parlato, R., Pitzer, C., van der Hoeven, F., et al. (2023) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2022112507 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., del Sol Keyer, M., Wittbrodt, J., & Mateo, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Thumberger, Thomas
- Wittbrodt, Joachim
- Mateo, Juan L.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-04-24
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0124633
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4409221
- OpenAlex
- W1990149668
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 25.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-04-20)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB873)
- Universität Heidelberg
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, sgRNA design, off-target prediction, genome editing, gene inactivation, non-homologous end joining, homology-directed repair, web-based prediction tool
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Software, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Targeting, Computational Biology, Internet, Genomics, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Web Browser
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review