CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Generation of Myostatin Knock-Out Sheep Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology and Microinjection into Zygotes

Crispo, M., Mulet, A. P., Tesson, L., Barrera, N., Cuadro, F., dos Santos-Neto, P. C., Nguyen, T. H., Crénéguy, A., Brusselle, L., Anegón, I., Menchaca, A.·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0136690PMC PMC4549068
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0136690

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. RE Hammer, 1985, Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection, Nature, 315, 680, 10.1038/315680a0 · DOI
  2. CB Whitelaw, 2008, Production of transgenic farm animals by viral vector-mediated gene transfer, Reprod Dom Anim, 43, 355, 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01184.x · DOI
  3. S Hyun, 2003, Production of nuclear transfer-derived piglets using porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with the enhanced green fluorescent protein, Biol Reprod, 69, 1060, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.014886 · DOI
  4. C Lois, 2002, Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors, Science, 295, 868, 10.1126/science.1067081 · DOI
  5. WA Kues, 2011, Advances in farm animal transgenesis, Prev Vet Med, 102, 146, 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.009 · DOI
  6. G Vajta, 2007, Somatic cell nuclear transfer in its first and second decades: successes, setbacks, paradoxes and perspectives, Reprod Biomed Online, 15, 582, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60391-4 · DOI
  7. A Chan, 1999, Transgenic animals: current and alternative strategies, Cloning, 1, 25, 10.1089/15204559950020076 · DOI
  8. M Crispo, 2014, Embryo development, fetal growth and postnatal phenotype of eGFP lambs generated by lentiviral transgenesis, Transgenic Res, 24, 31, 10.1007/s11248-014-9816-x · DOI
  9. S Remy, 2010, Zinc-finger nucleases: a powerful tool for genetic engineering of animals, Transgenic Res, 19, 363, 10.1007/s11248-009-9323-7 · DOI
  10. J Boch, 2011, TALEs of genome targeting, Nat Biotech, 29, 135, 10.1038/nbt.1767 · DOI
  11. F Delacote, 2013, High Frequency Targeted Mutagenesis Using Engineered Endonucleases and DNA-End Processing Enzymes, et al., 8, e53217
  12. S Menoret, 2013, Generation of Rag1-knockout immunodeficient rats and mice using engineered meganucleases, Faseb J, 27, 703, 10.1096/fj.12-219907 · DOI
  13. P Horvath, 2010, CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea, Science, 327, 167, 10.1126/science.1179555 · DOI
  14. K Whitworth, 2014, Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 System to Produce Genetically Engineered Pigs from In Vitro-Derived Oocytes and Embryos, Biol Reprod, 91, 78, 10.1095/biolreprod.114.121723 · DOI
  15. X Zhou, 2014, Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-targeted pigs via somatic cell nuclear transfer, Cel Mol Life Sci, 72, 1175, 10.1007/s00018-014-1744-7 · DOI
  16. A Honda, 2014, Single-Step Generation of Rabbits Carrying a Targeted Allele of the Tyrosinase Gene Using CRISPR/Cas9, Exp Anim, 64, 31, 10.1538/expanim.14-0034 · DOI
  17. W Ni, 2014, Efficient gene knockout in goats using CRISPR/Cas9 system, PloS one, 9, e106718, 10.1371/journal.pone.0106718 · DOI
  18. Z He, 2015, Highly efficient targeted chromosome deletions using CRISPR/Cas9, Biotechnol Bioeng, 112, 1060, 10.1002/bit.25490 · DOI
  19. W Tan, 2013, Efficient nonmeiotic allele introgression in livestock using custom endonucleases, PNAS, 110, 16526, 10.1073/pnas.1310478110 · DOI
  20. T Hai, 2014, One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system, Cell research, 24, 372, 10.1038/cr.2014.11 · DOI
  21. H Han, 2014, One-step generation of myostatin gene knockout sheep via the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Front Agr Sci Eng, 1, 2, 10.15302/J-FASE-2014007 · DOI · Paper page
  22. S-J Lee, 2004, Regulation of muscle mass by myostatin, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 20, 61, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.135836 · DOI · Paper page
  23. L Grobet, 1997, A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle, Nat Genet, 17, 71, 10.1038/ng0997-71 · DOI · Paper page
  24. PL Johnson, 2005, Meat quality traits were unaffected by a quantitative trait locus affecting leg composition traits in Texel sheep, J Anim Sci, 83, 2729, 10.2527/2005.83122729x · DOI
  25. D Vilette, 2000, Establishment of astrocyte cell lines from sheep genetically susceptible to scrapie, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 36, 45, 10.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0045:EOACLF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. J Bellec, 2015, CFTR Inactivation by lentiviral vector-mediated RNA Interference and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human airway epithelial cells, Current gene therapy
  27. A Menchaca, 2004, New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants, Reprod Fertil Dev, 16, 403, 10.1071/RD04037 · DOI
  28. S Remy, 2014, Efficient gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rat zygotes using TALE nucleases, Genome Res, 24, 1371, 10.1101/gr.171538.113 · DOI
  29. E Wagner, 2002, mRNA surveillance: the perfect persist, J Cell Sci, 115, 3033, 10.1242/jcs.115.15.3033 · DOI
  30. FE Haynes, 2013, Lack of association between allelic status and myostatin content in lambs with the myostatin g+6723G>A allele, J Anim Sci, 91, 78, 10.2527/jas.2012-5482 · DOI
  31. B Petersen, 2015, Molecular scissors and their application in genetically modified farm animals, Trans Research, 24, 381, 10.1007/s11248-015-9862-z · DOI
  32. AV Makarevich, 2005, Preimplantation development and viability of in vitro cultured rabbit embryos derived from in vivo fertilized gene-microinjected eggs: apoptosis and ultrastructure analyses, Zygote, 13, 125, 10.1017/S0967199405003138 · DOI
  33. JH Liu, 2008, Aberrant DNA methylation imprints in aborted bovine clones, Mol Reprod Dev, 75, 598, 10.1002/mrd.20803 · DOI
  34. H Niemann, 2008, Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning, Reprod, 135, 151, 10.1530/REP-07-0397 · DOI
  35. H Niemann, 2007, Transgenic farm animals: an update, Reprod Fertil Dev, 19, 762, 10.1071/RD07040 · DOI
  36. C Long, 2014, Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of germline DNA, Science, 345, 1184, 10.1126/science.1254445 · DOI · Paper page
  37. T Larcher, 2014, Characterization of dystrophin deficient rats: a new model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, PloS one, 9, e110371, 10.1371/journal.pone.0110371 · DOI
  38. Y Niu, 2014, Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos, Cell, 156, 836, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  39. FA Ran, 2013, Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity, Cell, 154, 1380, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  40. C Proudfoot, 2014, Genome edited sheep and cattle, Trans Research, 24, 147, 10.1007/s11248-014-9832-x · DOI
  41. C Zhang, 2014, Targeted disruption of the sheep MSTN gene by engineered zinc-finger nucleases, Mol Biol Rep, 41, 209, 10.1007/s11033-013-2853-3 · DOI
  42. P Wiener, 2009, The effects of a mutation in the myostatin gene on meat and carcass quality, Meat Science, 83, 127, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.04.010 · DOI
  43. LO Fiems, 2012, Double Muscling in Cattle: Genes, Husbandry, Carcasses and Meat, Animals, 2, 472, 10.3390/ani2030472 · DOI
  44. L Grobet, 1997, A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle, Nat Genet, 17, 71, 10.1038/ng0997-71 · DOI · Paper page
  45. C Zhang, 2012, Polymorphisms of myostatin gene (MSTN) in four goat breeds and their effects on Boer goat growth performance, Mol Biol Rep, 39, 3081, 10.1007/s11033-011-1071-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Crispo, M., Mulet, A. P., Tesson, L., Barrera, N., Cuadro, F., dos Santos-Neto, P. C., Nguyen, T. H., Crénéguy, A., Brusselle, L., Anegón, I., & Menchaca, A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-08-25
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
e0136690
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0136690
PMC
PMC4549068
Cited by
264
References
7
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review