The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Digital Sequencing Panel for Quantitative, Highly Accurate Evaluation of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA
Open accessAbstract
Next-generation sequencing of cell-free circulating solid tumor DNA addresses two challenges in contemporary cancer care. First this method of massively parallel and deep sequencing enables assessment of a comprehensive panel of genomic targets from a single sample, and second, it obviates the need for repeat invasive tissue biopsies. Digital Sequencing™ is a novel method for high-quality sequencing of circulating tumor DNA simultaneously across a comprehensive panel of over 50 cancer-related genes with a simple blood test. Here we report the analytic and clinical validation of the gene panel. Analytic sensitivity down to 0.1% mutant allele fraction is demonstrated via serial dilution studies of known samples. Near-perfect analytic specificity (> 99.9999%) enables complete coverage of many genes without the false positives typically seen with traditional sequencing assays at mutant allele frequencies or fractions below 5%. We compared digital sequencing of plasma-derived cell-free DNA to tissue-based sequencing on 165 consecutive matched samples from five outside centers in patients with stage III-IV solid tumor cancers. Clinical sensitivity of plasma-derived NGS was 85.0%, comparable to 80.7% sensitivity for tissue. The assay success rate on 1,000 consecutive samples in clinical practice was 99.8%. Digital sequencing of plasma-derived DNA is indicated in advanced cancer patients to prevent repeated invasive biopsies when the initial biopsy is inadequate, unobtainable for genomic testing, or uninformative, or when the patient's cancer has progressed despite treatment. Its clinical utility is derived from reduction in the costs, complications and delays associated with invasive tissue biopsies for genomic testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, ctDNA is readily detectable in lung cancer patient blood (20, 27, 29, 30), and sensitivity of variant detection was recently shown to be higher in ctDNA than CTCs (25).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774 · cited 1×
“different biopsies of the two tumors each typically missed one-third of the nonsynonymous somatic mutations found elsewhere in the tumor despite sequencing to 250-fold coverage [13].”
BackgroundNowell, P. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.959840 · Cited by 6,471 · cited 1×
“Peter Nowell posited almost 40 years ago that “each patient's cancer may require individual specific therapy, and even this may be thwarted by emergence of a genetically variant subline [subclone] resistant to the treatment” [62].”
BackgroundDetection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies
Bettegowda, C., Sausen, M., Leary, R. J., Kinde, I., Wang, Y., Agrawal, N., Bartlett, B. R., Wang, H., Luber, B., Alani, R. M., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094 · Cited by 5,067
Glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis is associated with endogenous endonuclease activation
Wyllie, A. H. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/284555a0 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 1×
“Cell-free circulating tumor DNA consists mainly of 166 base pair double-stranded DNA fragments resulting from apoptosis, necrosis or release of nuclear DNA into the circulation [18,19].”
BackgroundAccurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684 · cited 2×
“The 165 matched plasma and tissue samples were both analyzed on the Illumina Hi-Seq 2500 platform, the cfDNA analyzed using the digital sequencing method described herein and the DNA isolated from tissue samples analyzed using standard prep as per the manufacturer’s instructions [76].”
MethodA collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes
Neve, R. M., Chin, K., Fridlyand, J., Yeh, J., Baehner, F. L., Fevr, T., Clark, L., Bayani, N., Coppé, J., Tong, F. K., et al. (2006) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008 · Cited by 3,224
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010 · Cited by 3,219
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41 · Cited by 3,215
Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients
Schwarzenbach, H., Hoon, D. S. �., & Pantel, K. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3066 · Cited by 2,897
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Rosen S. World Market for Cancer Diagnostics, 5th Edition. 2013.
- P Mandel, 1948, Les acides nucléiques du plasma sanguin chez l’homme, CR Acad Sci Paris, 142, 241
- AmirAli Talasaz, 2014, Non-invasive and sequential profiling of metastatic solid tumors by Digital Sequencing of cell-free DNA [Abstract 3422S], Am Soc Hum Genet Annu Meet
- A Drilon, 2015, Broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing identifies actionable genomic alterations in “driver-negative” lung adenocarcinomas, Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res
- Maryke Appel Victoria van Kets, 2014, Kapa Hyper Prep: A next-generation kit for fast and efficient library construction from challenging DNA samples. [Abstract], Adv Genome Biol Technol
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 701
Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Path to Personalized Medicine
Cieslik, J., Behrens, B., Banys‐Paluchowski, M., Pruss, M., Neubacher, M., Ruckhäberle, E., Neubauer, H. J., Fehm, T. N., & Krawczyk, N. (2025) · Oncology Research and Treatment · doi:10.1159/000545643 · Cited by 7
“MTBs can utilize ctDNA analysis to identify therapeutically relevant mutations for patients who have exhausted standard therapy options (Tables 3, 5) [37 – 43].”
Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis in Lung Cancer—A Review
Makar, K., Wróbel, A., Antczak, A. J., & Tworek, D. (2025) · Advances in respiratory medicine · doi:10.3390/arm93030017 · Cited by 7
Circulating Tumor DNA in Early Breast Cancer
Schlam, I. M., Tolaney, S. M., Lin, N., Parsons, H., & Morganti, S. (2026) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.1465 · Cited by 7
Adir, Y., Tirman, S., Abramovitch, S., Botbol, C., Lutaty, A., Scheinmann, T., Davidovits, E., Arbel, I., Davidovits, G., Schneer, S., et al. (2018) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-018-2173-5 · Cited by 7
Larson, K., Kannaiyan, R., Pandey, R., Chen, Y., Babiker, H. M., & Mahadevan, D. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12030701 · Cited by 7
“1% mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) from a background of cfDNA extracted from healthy donors and reported as acquired somatic mutations by digital sequencing algorithms [14].”
BackgroundTargeted Next-Generation Sequencing of Liquid Biopsy Samples from Patients with NSCLC
Mellert, H. S., Reese, J., Jackson, L. P., Maxwell, V., Tschida, C., & Pestano, G. A. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11020155 · Cited by 7
Rajput, M., Pandey, M., & Dixit, R. (2026) · World Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1186/s12957-025-04185-3 · Cited by 7
McFarland, T. R., Thomas, V. M., Nussenzveig, R. H., Gebrael, G., Sayegh, N., Tripathi, N., Sahu, K. K., Goel, D., Maughan, B. L., Sirohi, D., et al. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10123170 · Cited by 6
“, Redwood City, CA, USA) [16] and FoundationOne Liquid CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc.”
Bar, Y., Keenan, J. C., Niemierko, A., Medford, A. J., Isakoff, S. J., Ellisen, L. W., Bardia, A., & Vidula, N. (2024) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-024-00633-7 · Cited by 6
“…discontinuation draws occurred at time of disease progression. cfDNA sequencing and new alterations analysis cfDNA sequencing was performed as part of routine care, using the commercially available Guardant360 ® sequencing platform (74 cancer-related genes) as previously described 47,48 .”
Rosenberg, S., Cohen, G. B., Kato, S., Okamura, R., Lippman, S. M., & Kurzrock, R. (2023) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13383 · Cited by 6
Chen, X., Li, D., Miao, K., Shou, T., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000032697 · Cited by 6
“The reason for this is maybe because he has several co-mutated genes or because of the heterogeneity of tumors, different subclones are produced between tumor tissues, which leads to the sensitivity and specificity of whole blood NGS test not reaching 100%, so patients cannot benefit from third-generation EGFR-TKI.”
BackgroundInfluentialVidula, N., Niemierko, A., Hesler, K., Ryan, L. Y., Moy, B., Isakoff, S. J., Ellisen, L. W., Juric, D., & Bardia, A. (2023) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-023-00528-z · Cited by 6
“Guardant360 ® is CLIA-certi fi ed, College of American Pathologists-accredited, New York State Department of Health-approved cfDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay with analytical and clinical validation previously reported 17,36,37 .”
Rostami‐Hodjegan, A., & Achour, B. (2023) · AAPS introductions in the pharmaceutical sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29541-6_6 · Cited by 7
An ultrasensitive method for detecting mutations from short and rare cell-free DNA
Wang, L., Zhuang, Y., Yu, Y., Guo, Z., Guo, Q., Qiao, L., Wang, X., Liang, X., Zhang, P., Li, Q., et al. (2023) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2023.115548 · Cited by 7
Spring, L. M., Mortensen, L. J., Abraham, E., Keenan, J. C., Medford, A. J., Ma, A., Padden, S., Denault, E. N., Ryan, L. Y., Iafrate, A. J., et al. (2023) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.23.00193 · Cited by 6
Cancer Liquid Biopsy: Is It Ready for Clinic?
Pan, Y., Ji, J. S., Jin, J. G., Kuo, W. P., & Kang, H. (2017) · IEEE Pulse · doi:10.1109/mpul.2016.2630838 · Cited by 6
“9999% analytic sensitivity and a comparable clinical sensitivity to that of tissue-derived NGS [8].”
BackgroundInfluentialRaja, T., & Warrier, N. K. (2017) · Indian Journal of Cancer · doi:10.4103/ijc.ijc_507_17 · Cited by 6
Mallampati, S., Zalles, S., Duose, D., Hu, P. C., Medeiros, L., Wistuba, I. I., Kopetz, S., & Luthra, R. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.06.008 · Cited by 3
“The sequencing findings were compared with those obtained after sequencing of these samples with the Guardant360 assay as an orthogonal method.(17) Frequencies of variant alleles that were detected in both assays had high concordance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing
Yamamoto, Y., Fukuyama, K., Kanai, M., Kondo, T., Yoshioka, M., Kou, T., Quy, P. N., Kimura‐Tsuchiya, R., Yamada, T., Matsumoto, S., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x · Cited by 6
“In ctDNA testing, small fractions of ctDNA can be detected among the total cell-free DNAs by incorporating a combination of molecular barcoding technology and bioinformatics methods [1].”
MethodUncommon EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Impact on the Treatment
Bílek, O., Holánek, M., Berkovcová, J., Horký, O., Kazda, T., Čoupková, H., Špelda, S., Kristková, L., Zvaríková, M., Podhorec, J., et al. (2019) · Klinicka onkologie · doi:10.14735/amko20193s6 · Cited by 7
Mack, P. C., Redman, M. W., Tukachinsky, H., Kozono, D., Minichiello, K., Dragnev, K. H., Tolba, K. A., Neal, J. W., Madison, R. W., Waqar, S. N., et al. (2025) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3658 · Cited by 5
Pontolillo, L., Davis, A. A., Gerratana, L., Medford, A. J., Wang, J. J., Nicolò, E., Clifton, K., Velimirovic, M., Warrior, S., Podany, E. L., et al. (2025) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-025-00802-2 · Cited by 6
“…Redwood City, CA,USA), a qualitative NGS-based in vitro diagnostic device that uses targeted high throughput hybridization-based capture technology for detection of SNVs, insertions and deletions (indels), CNVs and fusions of both synonymous and non-synonymous alteration in up to 74 genes 38 – 40 .”
Been, K. W., Kang, S., Bae, T., Hong, S., Kim, G., Hur, J. K., Hwang, W., & Chang, B. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17203343 · Cited by 5
“Recently, growing evidence has demonstrated the potential of diagnosing cancer by detecting DNA mutations from cfDNA, which is released from tumor tissues [6–18].”
A Phase 2 study of Savolitinib in Patients with MET Amplified Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Jia, J., Moyer, A. N., Lowe, M. E., Bolch, E. K., Kortmansky, J. S., Cho, M. T., Lenz, H., Kalyan, A., Niedzwiecki, D., & Strickler, J. H. (2024) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12029-024-01156-x · Cited by 5
“The study consisted of an initial screening stage, with patients prospectively screened for MET amp by the Guardant360 assay (Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA) [17].”
Spectrum of FGFR2/3 Alterations in Cell-Free DNA of Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Grivas, P. D., Kiedrowski, L. A., Sonpavde, G., Gupta, S. V., Thomas, R. A., Gourdin, T. S., Hardin, A. I., Hamann, K. M., Faltas, B. M., & Vogelzang, N. J. (2021) · Bladder Cancer · doi:10.3233/blc-201517 · Cited by 5
“Concordance of plasma cfDNA results with tumor tissue across solid tumors has been previously researched; overall concordance can vary depending on a variety of factors, including timing of sample collection and overlap of assay panels utilized, but in studies controlling for these variables, analytical concordance is…”
BackgroundTsui, D. C. C., Drusbosky, L. M., Wienke, S. E., Gao, D., Bubie, A., Bárbácioru, C., & Camidge, D. R. (2022) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2022.07.002 · Cited by 5
Li, Y., Jiang, X., Zhong, M., Yu, B., & Yuan, H. (2022) · Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s388653 · Cited by 5
“The ctDNA test is constrained by the assay panel’s design, which makes the tumor signal dilution and eventual susceptibility to false-negative findings possible.(33,34) Our results were consistent with other studies, suggesting that CTC sequencing can provide an alternative method for comprehensive genomic investigati…”
ResultMehdi, M., Szabo, A., Shreenivas, A. V., Thomas, J. P., Tsai, S., Christians, K. K., Evans, D. B., Clarke, C. N., Hall, W. A., Erickson, B. E., et al. (2024) · Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology · doi:10.1177/17588359241253113 · Cited by 5
Ma, W., Gong, J., Shan, J., Lewis, D. A., Xiao, W., Moore, E. H., Zhang, Y., Hung, J., MANS, N. Z., Wei, S., et al. (2018) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.18.00076 · Cited by 5
Koba, H., Kimura, H., Yoneda, T., Sone, T., Ohkura, N., Hara, J., Hosomichi, K., Tajima, A., & Kasahara, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87094-1 · Cited by 5
Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Surrogate Tumor Biopsy for Retinoblastoma
Uner, O. E., Ulrich, B. C., & Hubbard, G. B. (2018) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0392 · Cited by 5
Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Surrogate Tumor Biopsy for Retinoblastoma—Reply
Berry, J. L., Cobrinik, D. E., & Hicks, J. B. (2018) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0395 · Cited by 5
Best practices in sample management and molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma: a practical guide
Castet, F., Salcedo, M. T., Nuciforo, P. G., Aguilar, S., & Vivancos, A. P. (2025) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2025.2518145 · Cited by 4
“The limit of detection (LoD) in NGS has been optimized for liquid biopsy management by the use of unique molecular identifiers (UMI)- based approaches and improved bioinformatic analysis, reaching the 0.01% VAF [118,119].”
InfluentialFrom Lab to Clinic: Artificial Intelligence with Spectroscopic Liquid Biopsies
McHardy, R. G., Cameron, J. M., Eustace, D., Baker, M. J., & Palmer, D. S. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15202589 · Cited by 4
“However, in 2021, the FDA PMA approved two liquid biopsy tests that measure multiple genetic changes in plasma samples: Guardant360 ® CDx (Guardant Health) [146]. and FoundationOne ® Liquid CDx (Foundation Medicine) [147].”
Hwang, S., Shin, D. J., Kang, B., Kang, H., Lee, S. H., Kim, J. S., Joung, J., Jain, S., Olsen, S. R., Becker, L., et al. (2025) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000549565 · Cited by 4
“All cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extraction, processing, and sequencing were conducted at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified and College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited laboratory (Guardant Health, Inc.) as described previously [18].”
Ghiringhelli, F., Kim, R., Macarulla, T. M., Moreno, I., Razak, A. R. A., Rodon, J. A., Liao, C., Davis, S. L., Mahipal, A., Marron, T. U., et al. (2026) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2025-012344 · Cited by 5
Concordance between Tumor Tissue and Plasma DNA Genotyping in the NCI-MATCH Trial (EAY131)
Gouda, M. A., Jankú, F., Yuan, Y., Drusbosky, L. M., Chen, A. P., Zheng, X., Patel, K. P., Hamilton, S. R., Routbort, M. J., Tricoli, J. V., et al. (2025) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3531 · Cited by 5
Napolitano, S., Parikh, A. R., Henry, J. T., Parseghian, C. M., Willis, J. A., Raghav, K. P. S., Morris, V. K., Johnson, B., Kee, B. K., Dasari, A. N., et al. (2023) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.23.00228 · Cited by 4
Torres‐Martínez, S., Fariñas, S. C., Gallach, S., Mosqueda, M., Munera-Maravilla, E., Sirera, R., Navarro, L., Blasco, A., Camps, C., & Lewintre, E. J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242417587 · Cited by 4
Mahipal, A., Bucheit, L. A., Zhang, N. J., Barnett, R. M., Storandt, M. H., & Chakrabarti, S. (2025) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf044 · Cited by 4
“23,24 Guardant360 can detect genomic alterations in up to 83 genes and, in select genes, identify copy number amplifications, rearrangement/ fusions, and insertions/deletions.”
Circulating Cell‐Free DNA Concentration as a Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer
Rodríguez‐Ces, A. M., Rapado‐González, Ó., Losada, S. A., Formoso-Garcia, I., López-Cedrún, J. L., Triana‐Martínez, G., López‐López, R., & Suárez‐Cunqueiro, M. M. (2025) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.70002 · Cited by 4
“In contrast, in malignancies such as lung or colorectal cancer, several FDA-approved liquid biopsy assays are already being used for cancer diagnosis, treatment selection and response monitoring (Coronado et al. 2024; Lanman et al. 2015; Woodhouse et al. 2020).”
Clifton, K., Luo, J. R., Yu, T., Saam, J. R., Rich, T. A., Roshal, A., Frith, A. E., Rigden, C. E., Ademuyiwa, F. O., Weilbaecher, K. N., et al. (2020) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-020-06019-0 · Cited by 4
Zatarain-Barrón, Z. L., Cardona, A. F., Díaz-García, D. A., Rosales, R. T., Rojas, L., Cruz‐Rico, G., Nagy, R. J., Cabrera, L. A. E., Vargas, C., Saam, J. R., et al. (2021) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000514648 · Cited by 4
State of the Art and Future Direction for the Analysis of Cell-Free Circulating DNA
Heliebi, A. E., & Heitzer, E. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814470-1.00005-8 · Cited by 4
The Introduction and Clinical Application of Cell-Free Tumor DNA
Li, J., Liu, R., Huang, C., Chen, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_4 · Cited by 4
Regarding the Congruence Between 2 Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing Assays—Reply
Torga, G., & Pienta, K. J. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2326 · Cited by 4
Davis, A. A., Iams, W. T., Chan, D., Oh, M. S., Lentz, R. W., Peterman, N., Robertson, A., Shah, A., Srivas, R., Wilson, T., et al. (2019) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/19002550 · Cited by 4
CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer—Who Should Receive Them?
Chen, A., Zheng, Z.-Y., Anurag, M., Elkhanany, A. M., Chen, N., & Chang, E. C. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262110322 · Cited by 3
“Wild type CRAF can control endocrine therapy by directly activating CDK4, and up to 8% in a cohort of metastatic breast cancers [45] harbor genetic alterations in CRAF (e.g., amplification).”
Heo, S., Ham, S., Lee, H., Han, B., Roh, H., Jeong, S., Kim, H., Bang, D., Song, S., & Kim, T. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334282 · Cited by 3
Dahal, A., Sierra, T., Hayes, C. M., Assis, D. N., Rostami‐Hodjegan, A., Ghonem, N. S., & Achour, B. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2025.117244 · Cited by 3
Carbone, M., Amos, C. I., Attanoos, R. L., Boeri, M., Bueno, R., Bunn, P. A., Chirieac, L. R., Cooper, B. T., Fennell, D. A., Galateau-Sallé, F., et al. (2026) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2025.11.002 · Cited by 4
Progress in genome-inspired treatment decisions for multifocal lung adenocarcinoma
Powell, C., Saddoughi, S. A., & Wigle, D. A. (2023) · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1080/17476348.2023.2286277 · Cited by 3
“However, some suggest that genetic discordance between plasma and tissue samples could represent tumor heterogeneity rather than poor sensitivity, and that results should be interpreted in tandem when making treatment decisions [159–161].”
ResultDincman, T. A., Karam, J. A. Q., Giordano, A., Li, H., Drusbosky, L. M., Gourdin, T. S., Howe, P. H., & Lilly, M. B. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1202277 · Cited by 3
“Patients with mPC who were seen at the Medical University of South Carolina ’ s Hollings Cancer Center (Charleston, SC) from March 2015 through March 2020 and underwent ctDNA evaluation using the Guardant360 ® platform (Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) were eligible for analysis (21).”
MethodThe role of cell‐free DNA in non‐invasive diagnosis of urinary tract infection
Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Ma, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024) · UroPrecision · doi:10.1002/uro2.52 · Cited by 3
Gourdin, T. S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/cco.0000000000000443 · Cited by 3
Masuishi, T., Taniguchi, H., Kotani, D., Bando, H., Komatsu, Y., Shinozaki, E., Nakajima, T. E., Satoh, T., Nishina, T., Esaki, T., et al. (2019) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000590 · Cited by 3
Maharaj, D., Polineni, V., Abreu, M. M., & Gouvea, J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822620-9.00002-1 · Cited by 3
Circulating Tumor DNA Reflects Histologic and Clinical Characteristics of Various Lymphoma Subtypes
Kim, J. J., Kim, H. M., Kim, H., Kim, S., Lee, S., Choi, J. R., Shin, S., & Hwang, D. Y. (2023) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2023.667 · Cited by 3
“2024;56(1):314-323 tial heterogeneity [19,20].”
Dawood, S. S., Sandhir, N., Akasheh, M., Khoury, M. E., Otsmane, S., Al-Nassar, M., Abulkhair, O. A. M., Farhat, F., & Olsen, S. (2024) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000541571 · Cited by 3
“…ctDNA Next-Generation Sequencing Guardant360 ® (Guardant Health Inc.; Redwood City, CA, USA) is a comprehensive genomic pro fi ling assay that identi fi es single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), fusions, and ampli fi cations (amps) using a single blood sample [17, 18].”
Circulating DNA in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis
Vietsch, E. E., & Wellstein, A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811785-9.00014-4 · Cited by 3
Molecular Diagnosis of Human Disease
Williams, E. S., & Silverman, L. M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802761-5.00030-4 · Cited by 3
Circulating tumor DNA—From bench to bedside
Lim, J. S. J., Jankú, F., & Yap, T. A. (2017) · Current Problems in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.02.005 · Cited by 3
Kim, S., Kim, E., & Rim, K.-T. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13273-018-0024-2 · Cited by 3
Current Utility and Future Applications of ctDNA in Colorectal Cancer
Day, D., Frentzas, S., Naidu, C. A., Segelov, E., & Green, M. M. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.82316 · Cited by 3
“Improved sensitivity techniques with the use of targeted-sequencing methods have been developed by several groups [9, 91].”
BackgroundMethodMcGuire, A., Hughesman, C. B., McConechy, M. K., Melosky, B., Lam, S. C., Myers, R. L., Yee, J., Tang, E., & Yip, S. S. F. (2020) · Lung Cancer Management · doi:10.2217/lmt-2019-0017 · Cited by 3
Case report: 16-yr life history and genomic evolution of an ER+ HER2− breast cancerPreprint
Xu, B., Amallraja, A., Swaminathan, P., Elsey, R. J., Davis, C. M., Theel, S., Viet, S., Petersen, J. L., Krie, A. K., Davies, G., et al. (2020) · Molecular Case Studies · doi:10.1101/mcs.a005629 · Cited by 4
“Guardant360 is a 73-gene ctDNA sequencing (average coverage=8000×) test with analytic validation (Lanman et al. 2015; Odegaard et al. 2018).”
BackgroundProcessing UMI Datasets at High Accuracy and Efficiency with the Sentieon ctDNA Analysis PipelinePreprint
Hu, J., Jiang, C., Huang, Y. S., Chen, H., Feng, H., Freed, D. N., Qu, Y. D., Fan, R., Su, Z., & Chen, W. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494742 · Cited by 3
“As a result, the adoption of NGS ctDNA assays have soared in precision oncology applications 8,9 .”
BackgroundMartinez, L. M., Ribeiro, L. C. S. L., Guidi, R. G., de Moraes, C. M. T., Lyra, C. R., Liebl, B., Guimarães, V. H. A., de Lima, R. D., de Almeida, L. S., Suartz, C. V., et al. (2025) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-025-01648-4 · Cited by 3
“Pre-analytical factors such as the adequacy of the collection tube and the use of centrifugation are not yet standardized [19, 20].”
Brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutations in cell-free DNA
Vidula, N., Blouch, E. L., Hesler, K., Niemierko, A., & Bardia, A. (2025) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07705-7 · Cited by 2
“The test has a clinical sensitivity of 85%, analytic sensitivity of 0.1% mutant allele fraction (MAF), specificity greater than 99.9%, a molecule count average of 8000 molecules, and single read depth average of 15,000 molecules [11].”
InfluentialA duplex sequencing approach for high-sensitivity detection of genome-edited plants
Bonfini, L., Colaiacovo, M., Cristian, S., von Holst, C., Maretti, M., Gatto, F., Magni, F., Pérez-Bello, P., & Scaglione, D. (2025) · Food Chemistry Molecular Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.fochms.2025.100278 · Cited by 2
“High-throughput massive parallel sequencing approaches have been developed and validated in the biomedical field for the detection of low abundance sequence variants in cancer samples, in pathogens, as well as in other areas (Chen et al., 2023; Lanman et al., 2015; Newman et al., 2016).”
Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers
Yoon, S.-Y., Yang, G., Nam, J.-K., Goh, H.-J., Kim, T. N., & Leem, S. (2025) · Genes & Genomics · doi:10.1007/s13258-025-01680-5 · Cited by 2
Fu, Q., Wang, J., Yue, L., Lu, T., Shi, W., Li, C., Jiang, X., Wang, P., & Chen, F. (2025) · Practical Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00513 · Cited by 2
“It is widely used in molecular diagnostics for conditions like fetal abnormalities [8,9], transplanted organ rejection [10,11] and malignant tumors [12,13].”
Can TP53, TMB and TME Expand the Immunotherapy Benefit in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer?
Specchia, M., Drittone, D., Mazzotti, E., & Mazzuca, F. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17243984 · Cited by 2
“For example, FoundationOne, Guardant360 may classify the same tumor with differing TMB values [14,15].”
Methylated circulating tumor DNA biomarkers for the blood-based detection of cancer signals
Hitchins, M. (2022) · Epigenetics in Precision Medicine · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823008-4.00001-9 · Cited by 2
Chow, Y. P., Abidin, N. Z., Kow, K. S., Tho, L. M., & Wong, C. L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276161 · Cited by 2
“6% respectively as compared to tissue-based NGS [29].”
Background(2023) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.106.10 · Cited by 2
Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer
Li, H., Lu, S., Zhou, Z., Zhu, X., & Shao, Y. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3346-5_15 · Cited by 2
Vallabhaneni, E., Kareff, S. A., Barnett, R. M., Drusbosky, L. M., Dalal, S., Raez, L. E., Santos, E. S., Albrecht, F., Cusnir, M., & Rodríguez, E. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16061150 · Cited by 2
“…DNA isolated from plasma was processed for digital next-generation sequencing (NGS), in accordance with its previously described validation [21,22]. iPGVs are reported for mutations with a variant allele frequency suspicious for germline origin (e.g., based on variant allele fraction cut-offs…”
MethodOhyama, H., Hirotsu, Y., Amemiya, K., Amano, H., Hirose, S., Oyama, T., Iimuro, Y., Kojima, Y., Mikata, R., Mochizuki, H., et al. (2024) · Diagnostic Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/dc.25306 · Cited by 2
Sood, R., Niemierko, A., Ryan, L. Y., Spring, L. M., Moy, B., Bardia, A., & Vidula, N. (2025) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2825 · Cited by 2
Wang, P., Yang, R. K., Jelloul, F. Z., Luthra, R., Routbort, M. J., Chen, H., Loghavi, S., Ok, C. Y., Kanagal‐Shamanna, R., Roy‐Chowdhuri, S., et al. (2025) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.24.00299 · Cited by 2
“12,20 In this cohort, the allele frequencies (AFs) from 11 commonly mutated or clinically signi fi cant genes ( BRAF , EGFR , ERBB2 , KRAS , STK11 , TP53 , APC , NRAS , PIK3CA , PTEN , and SMAD4 ) in lung and colorectal cancers are shown in Figure 1B; 74% of these mutations were identi fi ed with…”
Ginghină, O., & Niţipir, C. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.72701 · Cited by 2
Alves, G., Chantre-Justino, M., & Delmonico, L. (2020) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020200919 · Cited by 2
Circulating Tumor DNA—the Potential of Liquid Biopsies
Cravero, K., & Park, B. H. (2016) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-016-0199-2 · Cited by 2
Impact of genomic sequencing on precision medicine for clinical oncology
Araujo, L. H., Krook, M. A., & Roychowdhury, S. (2016) · Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · doi:10.1080/23808993.2016.1184966 · Cited by 2
Adams, D. L., & Cristofanilli, M. (2017) · Cancer drug discovery and develogment/Cancer drug discovery and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50956-3_5 · Cited by 2
HER2 Activating Mutations in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
Murray, E. M., Cherian, M. A., Ma, C. X., & Bose, R. (2018) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-018-0265-z · Cited by 2
Alikhan, M. B., Al‐Kawaaz, M., Kaul, K. L., & Sabatini, L. M. (2019) · Advances in Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.yamp.2019.07.012 · Cited by 2
Verlicchi, A., Canale, M., Chiadini, E., Cravero, P., Urbini, M., Andrikou, K., Pasini, L., Flospergher, M., Burgio, M. A., Crinò, L., et al. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13091915 · Cited by 2
“Prior to sequencing, amplicon-based assays target hundreds of PCR amplicons, while hybrid capture increase the genomic region of interest [54–56].”
MethodClinical Application of Molecular Features in Therapeutic Selection and Drug Development
Lu, R., Tang, R. S., & Huang, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31503-0_8 · Cited by 2
Miranda, K. W., Cimino, S., & Eng, C. (2022) · Clinical colorectal cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2022.01.001 · Cited by 3
Evolution and clinical impact of genetic epistasis within EGFR-mutant lung cancersPreprint
Blakely, C. M., Watkins, T. B. K., Wu, W., Gini, B., Chabon, J. J., McCoach, C. E., McGranahan, N., Wilson, G. A., Birkbak, N. J., Olivas, V. R., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/117291 · Cited by 2
Schenk, D., Davis, M. J., Zhou, R., Mantilla, A., Galbraith, M., Spiro, O., Petrillo, O., do Valle, Í. F., Ferguson, A. R., Jooss, K. U., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.04.626817 · Cited by 2
Quantification of Rare Single-Molecule Species Based on Fluorescence Lifetime
Liu, C., Rastogi, A., & Yeh, H. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00397 · Cited by 1
Radefeldt, M., Stellmacher, S., Krake, S., Kragl, B., Lemke, S., Beetz, C., Bauer, P., Junghanß, C., & Al‐Ali, R. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13122274 · Cited by 1
“This correlation allows us to utilize ctDNA to estimate the effectiveness of therapy and to predict tumor relapse and metastasis by monitoring the ctDNA load [9]. ctDNA typically constitutes a mere 0.5% of the total ccfDNA [10], making precise detection methods essential.”
MethodInfluentialMutations Associated With High-Grade irAEs in NSCLC Patients Receiving Immunotherapies
Smith-Oliver, M. R., Wang, Y., Dixon, C. B., D'Agostino, R., Liu, Y., Ruiz, J., Oliver, G., Miller, L. D., Topaloĝlu, Ü., Chan, M. D., et al. (2024) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.07.003 · Cited by 1
Trin, K., Dalleau, C., Mathoulin-Pélissier, S., Tourneau, C. L., Dinart, D., & Bellera, C. A. (2025) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-025-01667-1 · Cited by 1
Phung, Q. H., Tsai, A. K., Park, B., Schat, R., Spong, R., Tsai, J., Kulkarni, A. A., Antonarakis, E. S., & Gupta, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1579364 · Cited by 1
Ashraf, A., Amir, S. Z., Jahangir, L., Daniel, E., & Mustafa, M. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105107 · Cited by 1
Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Insights From a Case Series
Mckay, C., Rahman, T., Ghimire, B., & Girgis, M. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.100833 · Cited by 1
“In contrast, Guardant360 is a fixed-panel ctDNA assay that provides comprehensive genomic profiling across a broad set of cancer-related genes, enabling identification of targetable alterations when deciding on treatment therapy [10].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lanman, R. B., Mortimer, S. A., Zill, O. A., Sebisanovic, D., Lopez, R., Blau, S., Collisson, E. A., Divers, S. G., Hoon, D. S. B., Kopetz, E. S., Lee, J., Nikolinakos, P. G., Baca, A. M., Kermani, B. G., Eltoukhy, H., & Talasaz, A.
- Affiliations
- Guardant (United States) (US)
- Northwest Medical Specialties (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Saint John's Health Center (US)
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- University Cancer and Blood Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lanman, Richard B.
- Talasaz, AmirAli
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-10-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e0140712
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4608804
- OpenAlex
- W1864344361
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 25.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- circulating tumor DNA, cell-free DNA, liquid biopsy, cancer gene panel, clinical validation, mutant allele fraction, solid tumors, biopsy alternative
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review