Cited by 79Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Mental Health Help-Seeking Intentions and Preferences of Rural Chinese Adults

Open access
Yu, Yu, Liu, Zi-wei, Hu, Mi, Liu, Hui-ming, Yang, Joyce P., Zhou, Liang, Xiao, Shui-yuan·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate mental health help-seeking intentions and preferences of rural Chinese adults and determine predictors of the intentions. METHODS: A total of 2052 representative rural residents aged 18-60 completed a cross-sectional survey by face-to-face interviews. The survey included seven questions asking about respondents' help-seeking intentions and preferences, and a series of internationally validated instruments to assess self-perceived health status, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse, mental health literacy, and attitudes towards mental illness. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of respondents were willing to seek psychological help if needed, and 72.4% preferred to get help from medical organizations, yet only 12% knew of any hospitals or clinics providing such help. A multivariate analysis of help-seeking intention revealed that being female, having lower education, higher social health, higher mental health knowledge, and physical causal attribution for depression were positive predictors of help-seeking intention. CONCLUSION: A huge gap exists between the relatively higher intention for help-seeking and significantly lower knowledge of helpful resources. Predictors of help-seeking intention for mental problems in the current study are consistent with previous studies. Interventions to increase help-seeking for mental problems by Chinese rural adults may be best served by focusing on increasing public awareness of help sources, as well as improving residents' mental health literacy and social health, with special focus on males and those more educated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0141889

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nearly 92% of individuals diagnosed with mental disorders in China never sought mental health care.

    “Evidence shows that nearly 92% of the individuals diagnosed with mental disorders in China never sought mental health care [8-11].”

    From Promoting the mental health of university students in China: Protocol for contextual assessment to inform intervention design and adaptation (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction reports that over 90% of adults with mental disorders in China are not treated, which supports the claim’s broad scale. It does not give a figure of nearly 92%, specify that those adults were diagnosed, or establish that they never sought care; being untreated is not necessarily the same as never seeking care. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Xu J, Wang B.H., Hu M.Y., Yang B.Y., Chen H.N., Xie Y.N. The Development and evaluation of self-rated health measurement scale-prior test version. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science. 2000; 9(01): 65– 8.
  2. [39]Xu J, Guo R., Liu Y.S., Wang P., Huang W.Y., Chen Z.L. The Study of Responsiveness on Self-rated Health Measurement Scale(the Revised Version 1.0). Chinese Journal of Health Statistics 20(05): 272– 5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Liu, Z.-W., Hu, M., Liu, H.-M., Yang, J. P., Zhou, L., & Xiao, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-11-06
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e0141889
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156180797
Cited by
79
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX002015)
  • Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate (CX2015B058)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
mental health help-seeking, help-seeking intentions, rural Chinese adults, mental health literacy, attitudes toward mental illness, social health, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse, help-seeking preferences, predictors of help-seeking, gender differences, educational attainment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, China, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Rural Population, Intention, Young Adult, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review