Cited by 126Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesPsychology and Mental Health

Mental health problems in rural contexts: What are the barriers to seeking help from professional providers?

Jackson, Henry, Judd, Fiona, Komiti, Angela, Fraser, Caitlin, Murray, Greg, Robins, Garry, Pattison, Philippa, Wearing, Alex·2007·Australian Psychologist

Abstract

The aim of this review was to determine which sociodemographic, illness-related and psychological/attitudinal factors impact on a person's decision to seek help and the factors associated with attitudes to help-seeking in rural contexts. A computer search of the literature for 1990 – 2006 using the terms “help-seeking” and “mental” found 350 studies. Examination of the abstracts by one of the authors (AK) identified 20 relevant studies, which we review under two major headings: those papers dealing with help-seeking studies not specific to (but which may have included) rural settings; and a second group of studies conducted specifically in rural locations or that directly compared rural with urban locations. A number of factors were found consistently to be predictive of both mental health utilisation and attitudes toward formal help-seeking. They included sociodemographic factors such as gender, age, and marital status; illness-related factors such as having a mental disorder, comorbidity, and psychological distress; and, to a much lesser extent, psychological/attitudinal factors, including stigma, stoicism, and self-efficacy. Psychological/attitudinal factors have been poorly investigated compared to sociodemographic and illness-related variables and are worthy of further investigation. Their impact and value may vary according to location. Proposed herein is the development of a comprehensive framework that has emerged from the health and place literature as one way of understanding barriers to accessing mental health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00050060701299532

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, H., Judd, F., Komiti, A., Fraser, C., Murray, G., Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Wearing, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Bendigo Health (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Department of Psychology, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne
Venue
Australian Psychologist
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
147-160
ISSN
  • 0005-0067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9544
OpenAlex
W2153509658
Cited by
125
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
help-seeking, mental health, rural mental health, barriers to care, help-seeking attitudes, sociodemographic factors, psychological distress, mental health stigma, Stoicism, self-efficacy, comorbidities, urban-rural differences, place and health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review