Cited by 48Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Development of a Short Version of MSQOL-54 Using Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory

Open access
Rosato, Rosalba, Testa, Silvia, Bertolotto, Antonio, Confalonieri, Paolo, Patti, Francesco, Lugaresi, Alessandra, Grasso, Maria Grazia, Toscano, Anna +2 more·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54, 52 items grouped in 12 subscales plus two single items) is the most used MS specific health related quality of life inventory. OBJECTIVE: To develop a shortened version of the MSQOL-54. METHODS: MSQOL-54 dimensionality and metric properties were investigated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch modelling (Partial Credit Model, PCM) on MSQOL-54s completed by 473 MS patients. Their mean age was 41 years, 65% were women, and median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.0 (range 0-9.5). Differential item functioning (DIF) was evaluated for gender, age and EDSS. Dimensionality of the resulting short version was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA. Cognitive debriefing of the short instrument (vs. the original) was then performed on 12 MS patients. RESULTS: CFA of MSQOL-54 subscales showed that the data fitted the overall model well. Two subscales (Role Limitations--Physical, Role Limitations--Emotional) did not fit the PCM, and were removed; two other subscales (Health Perceptions, Social Function) did not fit the model, but were retained as single items. Sexual Satisfaction (single-item subscale) was also removed. The resulting MSQOL-29 consisted of 25 items grouped in 7 subscales, plus 4 single items. PCM fit statistics were within the acceptability range for all MSQOL-29 items except one which had significant DIF by age. EFA and CFA indicated adequate fit to the original two-factor (Physical and Mental Health Composites) hypothesis. Cognitive debriefing confirmed that MSQOL-29 was acceptable and had lost no key items. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed MSQOL-29 is 50% shorter than MSQOL-54, yet preserves key quality of life dimensions. Prospective validation on a large, independent MS patient sample is ongoing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0153466

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study assessed coping, health-related quality of life, and general distress using validated instruments: the Coping Responses Inventory-Adult form, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21.

    “Coping Responses Inventory-Adult Form (CRI-Adult [33]; Italian version [38]): measure made up of 48 items assessing approach (logical analysis, positive reappraisal, guidance/support seeking, and problem-solving) and avoidance coping (cognitive avoidance, resigned acceptance, alternative rewards, and emotional discharge).”

    From Coping strategies and their impact on quality of life and physical disability of people with multiple sclerosis (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The printed citing sentence describes the 48-item Coping Responses Inventory–Adult Form and its coping subscales. The Results sections of our copy concern the MSQOL-29; searches for the Coping Responses Inventory, its 48 items, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale found no passage addressing those instruments. The source therefore does not verify the description attached to the citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai, Perera S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 950– 963. 12881816

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosato, R., Testa, S., Bertolotto, A., Confalonieri, P., Patti, F., Lugaresi, A., Grasso, M. G., Toscano, A., Giordano, A., & Solari, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" (IT)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
Corresponding author
Solari, Alessandra
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-04-14
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
e0153466
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2336057040
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (2013/R/20.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
MSQOL-54, multiple sclerosis, health-related quality of life, Rasch model, partial credit model, differential item functioning, cognitive debriefing, Expanded Disability Status Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition, Disability Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review