CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 382Emotions and Moral BehaviorEmotion and Mood RecognitionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity

Open access
Deng, Yaling, Chang, Lei, Yang, Meng, Huo, Meng, Zhou, Renlai·2016·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0158666PMC PMC4928818
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The present study investigated gender differences in both emotional experience and expressivity. Heart rate (HR) was recorded as an indicator of emotional experience while the participants watched 16 video clips that induced eight types of emotion (sadness, anger, horror, disgust, neutrality, amusement, surprise, and pleasure). We also asked the participants to report valence, arousal, and motivation as indicators of emotional expressivity. Overall, the results revealed gender differences in emotional experience and emotional expressivity. When watching videos that induced anger, amusement, and pleasure, men showed larger decreases in HR, whereas women reported higher levels of arousal. There was no gender difference in HR when the participants watched videos that induced horror and disgust, but women reported lower valence, higher arousal, and stronger avoidance motivation than did men. Finally, no gender difference was observed in sadness or surprise, although there was one exception-women reported higher arousal when watching videos that induced sadness. The findings suggest that, when watching videos that induce an emotional response, men often have more intense emotional experiences, whereas women have higher emotional expressivity, particularly for negative emotions. In addition, gender differences depend on the specific emotion type but not the valence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0158666

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. MG Gard, 2007, Sex differences in the time course of emotion, Emotion, 7, 429, 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.429 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Z Zhang, 2001, Behavioral medicine scale manual, Chinese J Behav Med Sci, 10, 19
  3. J Yi, 2003, The Chinese version of the TAS-20: reliability and validity, Chinese Mental Health J, 17, 763

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–381 of 381

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., & Zhou, R.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Renlai
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2016-06-30
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
e0158666
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0158666
PMC
PMC4928818
OpenAlex
W2466307579
Cited by
382
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
26.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB505101)
  • Shangshan funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
gender differences, emotional experience, emotional expressivity, heart rate, emotion induction, valence, arousal, avoidance motivation, sadness, anger, disgust, horror, amusements, pleasure, surprise
MeSH terms
Arousal, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review