Cited by 36Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumStress Responses and CortisolPregnancy-related medical research

The Association between Hair Cortisol and Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression in Pregnant Women

Open access
Wikenius, Ellen, Moe, Vibeke, Kjellevold, Marian, Smith, Lars, Lyle, Robert, Waagbø, Rune, Page, Christian Magnus, Myhre, Anne Margrethe·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Depression has been linked to an imbalance in cortisol. Until recently, cortisol has been studied by measuring concentrations at single time points in blood or saliva samples. Cortisol concentrations vary with circadian rhythm and experiences, from time point to time point. The measurement of hair cortisol concentration (HCC) is a new method of accessing mean, long-term cortisol concentrations. Recent studies show positive associations between depression and HCC, and prenatal maternal cortisol is thought to influence the developing fetus. We therefore examined the association between HCC and self-reported symptoms of depression in second trimester pregnant women. Participants were 181 women, recruited between September 2011 and October 2013 to the Little-in-Norway (LiN)-study. These women answered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Rating Scale (EPDS) on self-reported symptoms of depression, and one cm maternal scalp hair was collected and analyzed for cortisol concentrations. Multiple regression analyses did not show depressive symptoms as a predictor for HCC in our selection of pregnant women, while gestational age was significantly related. In conclusion, our study indicated that symptoms of depression during pregnancy did not predict HCC, but further studies of clinically depressed, pregnant women using gestational age as an adjustment variable are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0161804

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antepartum hair cortisol levels are less invasive to obtain and offer a more stable cumulative longitudinal measure of the maternal HPA-axis than cortisol from blood or saliva.

    “Third, instead of cortisol from blood or saliva, antepartum hair cortisol levels will be assessed that are less invasive to obtain and will offer a more stable cumulative longitudinal measure of the maternal HPA-axis that can be linked to different levels of antepartum depressive symptoms and adverse maternal and child outcomes [86].”

    From Effectiveness of a guided ACT-based self-help resilience training for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial embedded in a prospective cohort. (2020) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) contrasts single-time-point blood or saliva measurements with hair cortisol, which it says represents an approximately one-month mean. The Methods describe cutting hair near the scalp, but the paper does not establish that collecting it is less invasive than collecting saliva. Thus, the longitudinal-measure claim is supported, while the comparative invasiveness claim is not. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wikenius, E., Moe, V., Kjellevold, M., Smith, L., Lyle, R., Waagbø, R., Page, C. M., & Myhre, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Wikenius, Ellen
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
e0161804
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514831737
Cited by
36
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (NO) (196156)
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health Eastern and Southern Norway (RUBP)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
hair cortisol, maternal depression, pregnancy, antenatal depression, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, gestational age
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Hair, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Norway, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review