Cited by 584Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersHair Growth and Disorders

Hair as a retrospective calendar of cortisol production—increased cortisol incorporation into hair in the third trimester of pregnancy

Kirschbaum, Clemens, Tietze, Antje, Skoluda, Nadine, Dettenborn, Lucia·2009·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Hair has long been used in toxicology, forensic science, doping control and other fields as a biological specimen for the detection of environmental agents, drugs, or toxins. Most recent evidence suggests that also hormones are incorporated and trapped inside the growing hair. This has led to the hypothesis that cortisol measurement of distinct hair segments could provide a retrospective calendar of cortisol production for the individual. In this first proof-of-concept study in humans, we analyzed cortisol in hair donated by mothers with a neonate child (n-Mothers; N=103), mothers with toddlers 3-9 months of age (t-Mothers; N=19), and control women (N=20). We cut hair strands from each women into at least three 3-cm segments, which, based on an average hair growth rate of 1cm per month, would represent hair grown over the past three, six, and nine months, respectively. Since in the third trimester of pregnancy there is a well-documented increased production of cortisol, we expected to see elevated levels of cortisol in the most proximal hair segment of women who had just given birth to a child (n-Mothers) compared with the control women. Likewise, we expected to see elevated levels in the second, third, or fourth segment of mothers of 3-month olds, 6-months olds, and 9-months olds, respectively. These hair segments, cut at 4-12 cm from the scalp, would represent hair grown throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. Results showed that there was a strong monotonic decline in cortisol concentration from the segment closest to the scalp to the most distal hair segment (p<0.0001). Cortisol levels decreased by 30-40% from one segment to the next for the most recent four hair segments. Segments from hair older than one year had similarly, low levels of cortisol. Comparisons of cortisol levels in hair between n-Mothers and control women yielded the expected results: cortisol levels in the first 3-cm hair segment (i.e., closest to the scalp) of n-Mothers were two-fold higher than in controls (p<0.0001), probably reflecting increased cortisol levels throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. No differences in cortisol content were apparent for the second or third 3-cm segments in n-Mothers (p>0.2). When hair from mothers with 6-9 months old toddlers was analyzed, the hair segment representing the third trimester period contained the same amount of cortisol as the hair grown more recently in mothers with 3-4 months old toddlers only. Age of the women, hair curvature, hair color, and frequency of hair washes per week were unrelated to cortisol levels. We conclude that cortisol measured in human hair can be a valid reflection of increased cortisol production for a period of up to six months. Due to a rapid decline of cortisol levels in human adult hair, a retrospective calendar of cortisol exposure may be limited to the past six months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.08.024

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some loss of cortisol signal over time (declining concentrations farther from the scalp), possibly due to wash-out effects.

    “There is some loss of cortisol signal over time (reflected in declining concentrations farther from the scalp), possibly due to wash-out effects (Kirschbaum et al., 2009).”
  • Three independent published samples report cortisol decline rates per 1-cm hair segment of 2.5 pg/mg, 2.7±0.3 pg/mg, and 2.9±0.6 pg/mg.

    “Three independent, published samples report cortisol decline rates per 1-cm hair segment of 2.5 pg/mg (Kirschbaum et al., 2009), 2.7±0.3 pg/mg (Gao et al., 2010), and 2.9±0.6 pg/mg (Xie et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirschbaum, C., Tietze, A., Skoluda, N., & Dettenborn, L.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirschbaum, Clemens
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
32-37
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153903806
Cited by
584
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
Keywords
hair cortisol, third trimester, cortisol production, postpartum women, toddlers, hair growth rate, neonates
MeSH terms
Female, Hair, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review