Cited by 125Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchHeme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide

Lack of Effect of Oral Sulforaphane Administration on Nrf2 Expression in COPD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

Open access
Wise, Robert A., Holbrook, Janet T., Criner, Gerard, Sethi, Sanjay, Rayapudi, Sobharani, Sudini, Kuladeep R., Sugar, Elizabeth A., Burke, Alyce +8 more·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COPD patients have high pulmonary and systemic oxidative stress that correlates with severity of disease. Sulforaphane has been shown to induce expression of antioxidant genes via activation of a transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2). METHODS: This parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 2, randomized trial was conducted at three US academic medical centers. Patients who met GOLD criteria for COPD and were able to tolerate bronchoscopies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 25 μmoles, or 150 μmoles sulforaphane daily by mouth for four weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in Nrf2 target gene expression (NQ01, HO1, AKR1C1 and AKR1C3) in alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. Secondary outcomes included measures of oxidative stress and airway inflammation, and pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: Between July 2011 and May 2013, 89 patients were enrolled and randomized. Sulforaphane was absorbed in the patients as evident from their plasma metabolite levels. Changes in Nrf2 target gene expression relative to baseline ranged from 0.79 to 1.45 and there was no consistent pattern among the three groups; the changes were not statistically significantly different from baseline. Changes in measures of inflammation and pulmonary function tests were not different among the groups. Sulforaphane was well tolerated at both dose levels. CONCLUSION: Sulforaphane administered for four weeks at doses of 25 μmoles and 150 μmoles to patients with COPD did not stimulate the expression of Nrf2 target genes or have an effect on levels of other anti-oxidants or markers of inflammation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01335971.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0163716

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A trial with patients suffering from COPD failed to observe any changes in alveolar macrophage and expression of antioxidant genes after sulforaphane.

    “Trial with patients suffering from chronic pulmonary obstructive disease failed to observe any changes in alveolar macrophage and expression of antioxidant genes (Wise et al. 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wise, R. A., Holbrook, J. T., Criner, G., Sethi, S., Rayapudi, S., Sudini, K. R., Sugar, E. A., Burke, A., Thimmulappa, R., Singh, A., Talalay, P., Fahey, J. W., Berenson, C. S., Jacobs, M. R., Biswal, S., & on behalf of Broccoli Sprout Extract Trial Research Group
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Wise, Robert A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
e0163716
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549382977
Cited by
124
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5U01HL105569)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
Keywords
sulforaphane, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Nrf2, oxidative stress, antioxidant gene expression, alveolar macrophages, bronchial epithelial cells, NQO1, heme oxygenase-1, AKR1C1, AKR1C3, airway inflammation, lung function, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sulfoxides, Isothiocyanates, Oxidative Stress, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, NF-E2-Related Factor 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review