Cited by 29Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Measuring social motivation using signal detection and reward responsiveness

Open access
Chevallier, Coralie, Tonge, Natasha, Safra, Lou, Kahn, David, Kohls, Gregor, Miller, Judith, Schultz, Robert T.·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent trends in psychiatry have emphasized the need for a shift from categorical to dimensional approaches. Of critical importance to this transformation is the availability of tools to objectively quantify behaviors dimensionally. The present study focuses on social motivation, a dimension of behavior that is central to a range of psychiatric conditions but for which a particularly small number of assays currently exist. METHODS: In Study 1 (N = 48), healthy adults completed a monetary reward task and a social reward task, followed by completion of the Chapman Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales. In Study 2 (N = 26), an independent sample was recruited to assess the robustness of Study 1's findings. RESULTS: The reward tasks were analyzed using signal detection theory to quantify how much reward cues bias participants' responses. In both Study 1 and Study 2, social anhedonia scores were negatively correlated with change in response bias in the social reward task but not in the monetary reward task. A median split on social anhedonia scores confirmed that participants with high social anhedonia showed less change in response bias in the social reward task compared to participants with low social anhedonia. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that social anhedonia selectively affects how much an individual changes their behavior based on the presence of socially rewarding cues and establishes a tool to quantify social reward responsiveness dimensionally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0167024

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During reward paradigms, people expressing higher levels of social anhedonia change their responding style less in reaction to social, but not monetary, rewards.

    “When examining the learning component, during reward paradigms, people expressing higher levels of social anhedonia changed their responding style less in reaction to social, but not monetary, rewards (60, 61), demonstrating less favorable responses to social cues than would be expected.”

    From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection theory: A user’s guide [Internet]. Psychology press; 2004.
  2. [21]Collet L, Cottraux J. Inventaire abrégé de la dépression de Beck (13 items). L’encéphale. 1986; 10: 77– 9. 3743520
  3. [23]NIMH. Social Processes: Workshop Proceedings [Internet]. Available: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-funding/rdoc/social-processes-workshop-proceedings.shtml

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chevallier, C., Tonge, N., Safra, L., Kahn, D., Kohls, G., Miller, J., & Schultz, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Chevallier, Coralie
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e0167024
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557880642
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health (SAP # 4100047863)
  • Fondation Roger de Spoelberch
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-0001-02 PSL*, ANR-10-LABX-0087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social motivation, social anhedonia, social reward, monetary rewards, response bias, signal detection theory, dimensional assessment, reward responsiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Research Design, Reward, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review