Cited by 469Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Seeing it differently: visual processing in autism

Open access
BEHRMANN, M, THOMAS, C, HUMPHREYS, K·2006·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Several recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies have documented an impairment in face processing in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). It remains unknown, however, what underlying mechanism gives rise to this face processing difficulty. One theory suggests that the difficulty derives from a pervasive problem in social interaction and/or motivation. An alternative view proposes that the face-processing problem is not entirely social in nature and that a visual perceptual impairment might also contribute. The focus of this review is on this latter, perceptual perspective, documenting the psychological and neural alterations that might account for the face processing impairment. The available evidence suggests that perceptual alterations are present in ASD, independent of social function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.001

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical visual processing is widely documented in ASD, with alterations in basic perceptual functions including contrast sensitivity, boundary detection, field of view size, and color perception.

    “Atypical visual processing has been widely documented in individuals with ASD (see Simmons et al., 2009 for a review), with alterations in basic perceptual functions, including contrast sensitivity (Behrmann et al., 2006, Bertone et al., 2003), boundary detection (Vandenbroucke et al., 2008), field of view size (Song et al., 2015) and color perception (Franklin et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BEHRMANN, M., THOMAS, C., & HUMPHREYS, K.
Affiliations
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
Corresponding author
BEHRMANN, M
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
258-264
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048911223
Cited by
469
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, face processing, visual perception, perceptual impairment, social cognition, social motivation
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Facial Expression, Humans, Perceptual Disorders, Vision, Ocular, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review