Cited by 17Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Target specificity, in vivo pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the putative STAT3 inhibitor LY5 in osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma

Open access
Yu, Peter Y., Gardner, Heather L., Roberts, Ryan, Cam, Hakan, Hariharan, Seethalakshmi, Ren, Ling, LeBlanc, Amy K., Xiao, Hui +9 more·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: STAT3 is a transcription factor involved in cytokine and receptor kinase signal transduction that is aberrantly activated in a variety of sarcomas, promoting metastasis and chemotherapy resistance. The purpose of this work was to develop and test a novel putative STAT3 inhibitor, LY5. METHODS AND FINDINGS: An in silico fragment-based drug design strategy was used to create LY5, a small molecule inhibitor that blocks the STAT3 SH2 domain phosphotyrosine binding site, inhibiting homodimerization. LY5 was evaluated in vitro demonstrating good biologic activity against rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma cell lines at high nanomolar/low micromolar concentrations, as well as specific inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation without effects on other STAT3 family members. LY5 exhibited excellent oral bioavailability in both mice and healthy dogs, and drug absorption was enhanced in the fasted state with tolerable dosing in mice at 40 mg/kg BID. However, RNAi-mediated knockdown of STAT3 did not phenocopy the biologic effects of LY5 in sarcoma cell lines. Moreover, concentrations needed to inhibit ex vivo metastasis growth using the PuMA assay were significantly higher than those needed to inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation in vitro. Lastly, LY5 treatment did not inhibit the growth of sarcoma xenografts or prevent pulmonary metastasis in mice. CONCLUSIONS: LY5 is a novel small molecule inhibitor that effectively inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and cell proliferation at nanomolar concentrations. LY5 demonstrates good oral bioavailability in mice and dogs. However LY5 did not decrease tumor growth in xenograft mouse models and STAT3 knockdown did not induce concordant biologic effects. These data suggest that the anti-cancer effects of LY5 identified in vitro were not mediated through STAT3 inhibition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0181885

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ex vivo techniques have been adapted to study tumour-host interactions, screen for metastasis-related vulnerabilities, and validate hits from other screens.

    “These techniques have been adapted to study tumour-host interactions, to screen for metastasis-related vulnerabilities and to validate hits identified in other screens 74,75,92,216,217,218,219 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [219]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, P. Y., Gardner, H. L., Roberts, R., Cam, H., Hariharan, S., Ren, L., LeBlanc, A. K., Xiao, H., Lin, J., Guttridge, D. C., Mo, X., Bennett, C. E., Coss, C. C., Ling, Y., Phelps, M. A., Houghton, P., & London, C. A.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
London, Cheryl A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-07-27
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
e0181885
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741632062
Cited by
17
References
42
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P01 CA165995, P30 CA016058)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR001070)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
STAT3 inhibitor, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcoma, STAT3 phosphorylation, fragment-based drug discovery, oral bioavailability, lung metastasis, tumor xenografts, STAT3 knockdown, target specificity, anticancer efficacy
MeSH terms
Aminopyridines, Animals, Cell Survival, Dogs, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Phosphorylation, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Sarcoma, Ewing, Osteosarcoma, Sulfonamides, Cytokines, Treatment Outcome, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review