Cited by 65Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in Education

Mobile apps for speech-language therapy in adults with communication disorders: review of content and quality

Open access
Vaezipour, Atiyeh, Campbell, Jessica, Theodoros, Deborah, Russell, Trevor·2020·JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, more than 75% of people with acquired brain injury (ABI) experience communication disorders. Communication disorders are impairments in the ability to communicate effectively, that is, sending, receiving, processing, and comprehending verbal and nonverbal concepts and symbols. Such disorders may have enduring impacts on employment, social participation, and quality of life. Technology-enabled interventions such as mobile apps have the potential to increase the reach of speech-language therapy to treat communication disorders. However, ensuring that apps are evidence-based and of high quality is critical for facilitating safe and effective treatment for adults with communication disorders. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to identify mobile apps that are currently widely available to adults with communication disorders for speech-language therapy and to assess their content and quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). METHODS: Google Play Store, Apple App Store, and webpages were searched to identify mobile apps for speech-language therapy. Apps were included in the review if they were designed for the treatment of adult communication disorders after ABI, were in English, and were either free or for purchase. Certified speech-language pathologists used the MARS to assess the quality of the apps. RESULTS: From a total of 2680 apps identified from Google Play Store, Apple App Store, and web searches, 2.61% (70/2680) apps met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Overall, 61% (43/70) were available for download on the iPhone Operating System (iOS) platform, 20% (14/70) on the Android platform, and 19% (13/70) on both iOS and Android platforms. A content analysis of the apps revealed 43 apps for language, 17 apps for speech, 8 apps for cognitive communication, 6 apps for voice, and 5 apps for oromotor function or numeracy. The overall MARS mean score was 3.7 out of 5, SD 0.6, ranging between 2.1 and 4.5, with functionality being the highest-scored subscale (4.3, SD 0.6), followed by aesthetics (3.8, SD 0.8), information (3.4, SD 0.6), and engagement (3.3, SD 0.6). The top 5 apps were Naming Therapy (4.6/5), Speech Flipbook Standard (4.6/5), Number Therapy (4.5/5), Answering Therapy, and Constant Therapy (4.4/5). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically identify and evaluate a broad range of mobile apps for speech-language therapy for adults with communication disorders after sustaining ABI. We found a lack of interactive and engaging elements in the apps, a critical factor in sustaining self-managed speech-language therapy. More evidence-based apps with a focus on human factors, user experience, and a patient-led design approach are required to enhance effectiveness and long-term use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/18858

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • User-centered design (UCD) can significantly enhance user engagement and intervention outcomes in technology-based health apps.

    “consistent with findings demonstrating that UCD can significantly enhance user engagement and intervention outcomes in technology-based health apps [2755].”

    From Outcomes of an App-Based Intervention to Target Naming Among Individuals With Poststroke Aphasia: Virtual Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion (Principal Findings; page not supplied) suggests that a lack of human-centered approaches might explain low engagement scores. The Conclusions (page not supplied) recommend patient-led co-design and say such apps could potentially improve therapy effectiveness. The review does not demonstrate a significant improvement in engagement or intervention outcomes, and its focus is speech-language therapy apps rather than health apps generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A review by Vaezipour et al revealed a general lack of engaging and interactive elements in mobile apps for speech therapy in adults with communication disorders.

    “A similar review identifying and evaluating mobile apps for speech therapy in adults with communication disorders (not limited to aphasia) revealed that there was a general lack of engaging and interactive elements in the apps [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaezipour, A., Campbell, J., Theodoros, D., & Russell, T.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Vaezipour, Atiyeh
Venue
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e18858
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095259585
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile application, speech therapy, communication disorders, acquired brain injury, app quality assessment, Mobile App Rating Scale, digital health interventions, speech therapy apps, cognitive communication, voice disorders, oromotor function, app store search, adults with brain injury, app security and privacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication Disorders, Humans, Language Therapy, Quality of Life, Speech, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review