Cited by 29Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Determining respiratory rate from photoplethysmogram and electrocardiogram signals using respiratory quality indices and neural networks

Open access
Baker, Stephanie, Xiang, Wei, Atkinson, Ian·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Continuous and non-invasive respiratory rate (RR) monitoring would significantly improve patient outcomes. Currently, RR is under-recorded in clinical environments and is often measured by manually counting breaths. In this work, we investigate the use of respiratory signal quality quantification and several neural network (NN) structures for improved RR estimation. We extract respiratory modulation signals from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals, and calculate a possible RR from each extracted signal. We develop a straightforward and efficient respiratory quality index (RQI) scheme that determines the quality of each moonddulation-extracted respiration signal. We then develop NNs for the estimation of RR, using estimated RRs and their corresponding quality index as input features. We determine that calculating RQIs for modulation-extracted RRs decreased the mean absolute error (MAE) of our NNs by up to 38.17%. When trained and tested using 60-sec waveform segments, the proposed scheme achieved an MAE of 0.638 breaths per minute. Based on these results, our scheme could be readily implemented into non-invasive wearable devices for continuous RR measurement in many healthcare applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0249843

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A key challenge for RR algorithms is to make them robust to signal artifact and only output values associated with a high degree of confidence, particularly when used with wearable data.

    “A key challenge is to make algorithms robust to signal artifact and only output values associated with a high degree of confidence”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [148]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, S., Xiang, W., & Atkinson, I.
Affiliations
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Baker, Stephanie
  • Xiang, Wei
  • Atkinson, Ian
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e0249843
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3151990753
Cited by
29
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Funders
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
respiratory rate estimation, photoplethysmogram, electrocardiogram, artificial neural networks, non-invasive respiratory monitoring, wearable devices
MeSH terms
Electrocardiography, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Photoplethysmography, Respiratory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review