Cited by 28Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducational Games and GamificationCognitive Functions and Memory

A game-factors approach to cognitive benefits from video-game training: A meta-analysis

Open access
Smith, Evan T., Basak, Chandramallika·2023·PLOS ONE

Abstract

This current study is a meta-analysis conducted on 63 studies on video-game based cognitive interventions (118 investigations, N = 2,079), which demonstrated a moderate and significant training effect on overall gains in cognition, g = 0.25, p < .001. Significant evidence of transfer was found to overall cognition, as well as to attention/perception and higher-order cognition constructs. Examination of specific gameplay features however showed selective and differential transfer to these outcome measures, whereas the genre labels of "action", "strategy", "casual", and "non-casual" were not similarly predictive of outcomes. We therefore recommend that future video-game interventions targeting cognitive enhancements should consider gameplay feature classification approach over existing genre classification, which may provide more fruitful training-related benefits to cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0285925

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancements in higher-order cognitive functions such as working memory, reasoning, and executive control appear linked to mechanics involving allocentric perspective, combat engagement, and single controllable object gameplay.

    “Enhancements in higher-order cognitive functions, such as working memory, reasoning, and executive control, appear linked to mechanics involving allocentric (external) perspective, combat engagement, and single controllable object gameplay [38].”

    From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Discussion’s “Higher-order cognition outcomes” section links transfer in executive control, working memory updating, and reasoning to allocentric movement, combat interaction, and a single controllable object. The claim calls the first factor an allocentric (external) perspective, but the paper codes movement and perspective separately; its finding for higher-order cognition concerns movement, not external perspective. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Video game features such as first-person perspective, combat interactions, control of multiple objects, passive win conditions, and high time pressure are most strongly associated with improvements in attention and perception.

    “Video game features such as first-person perspective, combat interactions, control of multiple objects, passive win conditions, and high time pressure are most strongly associated with improvements in attention and perception [38–40].”

    From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports greater transfer to attention and perception for first-person perspective, combat-focused games, multiple controllable objects, and passive thresholds or objectives. It also says attention and perception outcomes were insensitive to the presence or absence of time pressure, so the claim's inclusion of high time pressure is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analyzing specific game mechanics may provide a more accurate measure of cognitive transfer in video games than category or genre classifications such as action or strategy.

    “A recent study suggests that analyzing specific game mechanics may provide a more accurate measure of cognitive transfer in video games than category/genre classifications, such as action or strategy [38].”
  • Cognitive transfer outcomes for action video games vary substantially across studies.

    “Cognitive transfer outcomes for action video games vary substantially across studies [38–40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [43]Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov B.N. and Csaki F. (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory. 1973, 267– 281. Budapest: Academia Kiado.
  2. [48]Cohen JE, Green CS, Bavelier D. Training visual attention with video games: Not all games are created equal. In: O’Neil F, Perez RS, editors. Computer Games and Team and Individual Learning. Elsevier. 2008; 205– 277.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E. T., & Basak, C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
  • Smith, Evan T.
  • Basak, Chandramallika
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2023-08-02
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
e0285925
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385481234
Cited by
28
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R56AG060052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
video games, cognitive training, game-based intervention, transfer of training, game genre classification, attention, perception, higher-order cognition, cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review