Cited by 398Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducational Games and GamificationDigital Games and Media

Enhancing cognition with video games: a multiple game training study

Open access
Oei, Adam C., Patterson, Michael D.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence points to a causal link between playing action video games and enhanced cognition and perception. However, benefits of playing other video games are under-investigated. We examined whether playing non-action games also improves cognition. Hence, we compared transfer effects of an action and other non-action types that required different cognitive demands. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We instructed 5 groups of non-gamer participants to play one game each on a mobile device (iPhone/iPod Touch) for one hour a day/five days a week over four weeks (20 hours). Games included action, spatial memory, match-3, hidden- object, and an agent-based life simulation. Participants performed four behavioral tasks before and after video game training to assess for transfer effects. Tasks included an attentional blink task, a spatial memory and visual search dual task, a visual filter memory task to assess for multiple object tracking and cognitive control, as well as a complex verbal span task. Action game playing eliminated attentional blink and improved cognitive control and multiple-object tracking. Match-3, spatial memory and hidden object games improved visual search performance while the latter two also improved spatial working memory. Complex verbal span improved after match-3 and action game training. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Cognitive improvements were not limited to action game training alone and different games enhanced different aspects of cognition. We conclude that training specific cognitive abilities frequently in a video game improves performance in tasks that share common underlying demands. Overall, these results suggest that many video game-related cognitive improvements may not be due to training of general broad cognitive systems such as executive attentional control, but instead due to frequent utilization of specific cognitive processes during game play. Thus, many video game training related improvements to cognition may be attributed to near-transfer effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0058546

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The active control group played two casual video games used in previous training studies, which do not specifically tap WM processes.

    “This active control group played two casual video games used in previous training studies [15, 54–57], which do not specifically tap WM processes.”
  • Boosted by the publication of a Nature letter showing that video game training can enhance cognitive control in older adults, serious games specifically adapted to people with AD have been developed and employed to train physical and cognitive abilities, showing preliminary but encouraging results.

    “Boosted by the publication of a Nature letter showing that video game training can enhance cognitive control in older adults (343), SG specifically adapted to people with AD have been developed and employed to train physical and cognitive abilities, showing preliminary but encouraging results (341, 344–348).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Cohen JE, Green CS, Bavelier D (2008) Training visual attention with video games: Not all games are created equal. In: O’Neil HF, Perez RS, editors. Computer games and team and individual learning. Oxford, UK: Elseiver Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oei, A. C., & Patterson, M. D.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Oei, Adam C.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-13
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e58546
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020754547
Cited by
398
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 6
FWCI
34.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
video game training, action video games, transfer of learning, near transfer, attentional blink, multiple object tracking, cognitive control, spatial working memory, verbal span, visual search, mobile games, hidden object games, life simulation games
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Reaction Time, Spatial Behavior, Video Games, Biomedical Enhancement, Attentional Blink

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review