Cited by 36Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of total serum cortisol with LC-MS/MS

Hawley, James M, Owen, Laura J, MacKenzie, Finlay, Mussell, Chris, Cowen, Simon, Keevil, Brian G·2016·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of serum cortisol is required to diagnose and treat adrenal disorders. Although certified reference materials (CRMs) are available to standardize cortisol measurements, External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemes still demonstrate a wide dispersion of results. We present a serum cortisol candidate reference measurement procedure that, through analysis of a Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine-listed panel of higher-order CRMs, provides metrologically traceable results. METHOD: Isotope-labeled internal standard was added to samples before supported liquid extraction. Extracts were analyzed with LC-MS/MS in positive electrospray ionization mode. Multiple reaction monitoring was used to detect cortisol and its corresponding internal standard transitions. We measured samples in triplicate over 3 days and calculated the mean result. RESULTS: Mean intra- and interassay imprecision were 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively, for concentrations of 154, 510, and 769 nmol/L. Ionization efficiency studies and structural analog analysis proved the method to be robust against interferences. Through analysis of 34 CRMs (83-764 nmol/L), expanded measurement uncertainty was calculated to be 5% (95% CI). The mean bias between the measured and target CRM concentrations was statistically insignificant at -0.08%. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and low measurement uncertainty of this method qualify it as a CRM procedure. Metrological traceability has been achieved through the analysis of higher-order CRMs. This method could be used to underpin serum cortisol EQA schemes to provide samples with a traceable target value, enabling participating laboratories to determine the accuracy and measurement uncertainty of their assays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2015.243576

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure had interassay coefficients of variation of 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.1% at cortisol concentrations of 132, 520, and 772 nmol/L.

    “Interassay %CVs for this method were 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.1% at concentrations of 132, 520, and 772 nmol/L respectively.”
  • Using a candidate reference measurement procedure ensured each method was compared with a higher-order measurement procedure, certifying metrological traceability to SI units and providing a platform for meaningful statistical analysis.

    “Underpinning this study with a cRMP has ensured that each method was compared to a higher-order measurement procedure.This certifies metrological traceability to SI units thereby, providing a platform for meaningful statistical analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawley, J. M., Owen, L. J., MacKenzie, F., Mussell, C., Cowen, S., & Keevil, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • LGC (GB)
Corresponding author
Hawley, James M
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
262-269
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2180067923
Cited by
36
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
serum cortisol, reference measurement procedure, certified reference materials, measurement traceability, external quality assessment, measurement uncertainty, isotope-labeled internal standards, supported liquid extraction, multiple reaction monitoring, adrenal disorders, ionization efficiency
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reference Standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Linear Models, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review