Cited by 258Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Kakkar, Rahul K., Berry, Richard B.·2007·Chest

Abstract

Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the treatment of choice for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that PAP can effectively reduce the apnea-hypopnea index and improve subjective and objective sleepiness. Some studies have also demonstrated benefits in sleep quality and quality of life for both the patient and bed partner. Observational studies have shown a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events in OSA patients treated with PAP compared to untreated patients. Since continuous PAP (CPAP) treatment of OSA was described, additional modes of pressure delivery have been developed (bilevel PAP, autoadjusting PAP, flexible PAP). While none of the variants of PAP improves adherence in unselected patients compared to CPAP, individual patients may respond to a change in pressure mode. Attended PAP titration remains the standard of practice for selecting a treatment pressure. However, use of autotitrating PAP devices in the unattended setting can provide an effective titration alternative with careful patient selection and review of titration results. More choices of mask interface are now available to improve comfort and intervene for mask or mouth leaks. However, despite the increase in PAP treatment options, lack of acceptance and inadequate adherence to PAP therapy remain the major causes of treatment failure. Some studies suggest that heated humidification can improve PAP adherence, especially in pati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.06-2432

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kakkar, R. K., & Berry, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Malcom Randall VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
1057-1072
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070050199
Cited by
258
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, medication adherence, heated humidification, apnea-hypopnea index, sleepiness, cardiovascular risk, quality of life, patient education
MeSH terms
Humans, Masks, Patient Compliance, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review