Cited by 73Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth and Well-being Studies

Características psicométricas da versão portuguesa da Escala Multidimensional de Suporte Social Percebido (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support - MSPSS)

Open access
Carvalho, Serafim, Pinto-Gouveia, José, Pimentel, Paulo, Maia, Dulce, Mota-Pereira, Jorge·2011·Psychologica

Abstract

A Escala Multidimensional de Suporte Social Percebido (MSPSS), originalmente desenvolvida por Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, e Farley (1988), foi criada para avaliar subjectivamente o suporte social proveniente da família, dos amigos e de outros significativos. Neste trabalho apresentam-se as características psicométricas da versão portuguesa da MSPSS. A escala foi avaliada num grupo de estudantes (n = 454), num grupo da população geral (n = 261) e num grupo de doentes com depressão major (n = 100). A análise factorial demonstrou a existência de três factores (Família, Amigos e Outros Significativos). Igualmente apresentou uma boa consistência interna, entre .85 e .95, considerando os três factores, os três grupos e ambos os géneros; apresentou uma adequada validade de construto e a estabilidade teste-reteste no grupo de estudantes e população geral apresentou valores entre .40 e .91. Os alfas de Cronbach no reteste oscilaram entre .87 e .95. A presente versão da MSPSS mostrou ter qualidades psicométricas adequadas para ser utilizada em estudantes, em sujeitos da população geral bem como em populações com psicopatologia depressiva, sendo necessária agora a continuação da investigação em outras amostras e utilizando estudos de seguimento.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14195/1647-8606_54_13

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, S., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Pimentel, P., Maia, D., & Mota-Pereira, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital de Magalhães Lemos (PT)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (PT)
  • Universidade Lusófona do Porto (PT)
Venue
Psychologica
Published
2011-07-01
Issue
54
Pages
331-357
ISSN
  • 0871-4657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1647-8606
OpenAlex
W2119958852
Cited by
73
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, perceived social support, Portuguese version, psychometric properties, factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, university students, depression, family support, peer support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review