Cited by 129Diet and metabolism studiesObesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Diet in the management of weight loss

Open access
Strychar, I.·2006·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

Obesity is an established risk factor for numerous chronic diseases, and successful treatment will have an important impact on medical resources utilization, health care costs, and patient quality of life. With over 60% of our population being overweight, physicians face a major challenge in assisting patients in the process of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Low-calorie diets can lower total body weight by an average of 8% in the short term. These diets are well-tolerated and characterize successful strategies in maintaining significant weight loss over a 5-year period. Very-low-calorie diets produce a more rapid weight loss but should only be used for fewer than 16 weeks because of clinical adverse effects. Diets that are severely restricted in carbohydrates (3%-10% of total energy intake) and do not emphasize a reduction of energy intake may be effective in reducing weight in the short term, but there is no evidence that they are sustainable or innocuous in the long term because their high saturated-fat content may be atherogenic. Fat restriction in a weight-loss regimen is beneficial, but the optimal percentage has yet to be determined. Longitudinal trials are needed to resolve these issues. In this article I discuss the evidence for and pitfalls of various types of weight-loss diets and identify issues that physicians need to address in weight loss and weight-loss maintenance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.045037

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 142 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    Use of very-low-calorie diets does not improve weight-loss maintenance.

    “Use of very-low-calorie diets does not improve weight-loss maintenance; 8 however, there is some disagreement on this issue.73,74”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The evidence report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083; 1998 September.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [74] 74. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, et al. Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:579-84. source

      The discussion (under Figure 1) says use of very-low-energy diets was strongly related to successful long-term weight-loss maintenance. Its conclusion reports 7 kg of maintenance at 4–5 years among participants who used such a diet or lost at least 20 kg. This is contrary to the claim that these diets do not improve maintenance, though the paper cautions that its observational design limits causal conclusions. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Weight-loss goals

    A weight loss of 5%-10% reduces the risk of heart disease and stroke.

    “A weight loss of 5%-10% has been shown to reduce the risk of heart disease and stroke.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutrition committee of the Ameri- can Heart Association. Circulation 2000;102:2284-99. source

      In “Achieve and maintain a healthy body weight—General Principles” (page not provided), the guidelines say that 5%–10% weight reduction can reduce risk factors for heart disease and stroke. The cited passage does not establish that this amount of weight loss has been shown to reduce the risk of the diseases themselves. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Low-carbohydrate diets

    Low-carbohydrate diets are relatively high in fat and protein content.

    “Low-carbohydrate diets are relatively high in fat and protein content and are not recommended by the American Heart Association.47,48”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] 47. St. Jeor ST, Howard BV, Prewitt E, et al.; AHA Nutrition Committee. AHA Science advisory. Dietary protein and weight reduction. A statement for healthcare profes- sionals from the nutrition committee of the Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001;104:1869-74. source
    • cites [48] 48. Kappagoda CT, Hyson DA, Amsterdam EA. Low-carbohydrate-high-protein diets. Is there a place for them in clinical cardiology? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:725-30.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Decreases in fat intake are associated with weight loss.

    “Similarly, Bray and Popkin 27 and Yu-Poth and colleagues 15 found that decreases in fat intake were associated with weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] 27. Bray GA, Popkin BM. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68: 1157-73. source
    • cites [15] 15. Yu-Poth S, Zhao G, Etherton T, et al. Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular dis- ease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:632-46. source
  • Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    The high carbohydrate content of very-low-fat diets can increase triglyceride levels.

    “The American Heart Association 78 cautions against the use of such diets because their high carbohydrate content can increase triglyceride levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] 78. Lichtenstein AH, Van Horn L, for the AHA Nutrition Committee. AHA Science ad- visory. Very low fat diets. A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutri- tion committee of the Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;98:935-9. source
  • May combine two claims. 41
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Evidence

    The potential negative effects of high-carbohydrate diets on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels may be attenuated if monounsaturated fats replace carbohydrates or if the diets are high in fibre and have a low glycemic index.

    “The potential negative effects of high-carbohydrate diets on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels may be attenuated if monounsaturated fats replace carbohydrates 12,32,36 or if the diets are high in fibre and have a low glycemic index, 12,[37][38][39][40] although this remains controversial in the treatment of obesity.41,42”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutrition committee of the Ameri- can Heart Association. Circulation 2000;102:2284-99. source

      In “Limit the intake of foods high in cholesterol” (page unavailable), the guidelines say that high-carbohydrate diets can raise triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol, and that high-fiber diets may lessen these changes. “High Unsaturated Fat Diets” (page unavailable) says unsaturated fat can prevent or attenuate the same changes. The discussion of glycemic indexing concerns blood-glucose levels, not whether a low glycemic index attenuates the triglyceride and HDL effects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [32] 32. Parks EJ, Hellerstein MK. Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:412-33. source
    • cites [36] 36. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel. Detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Executive summary. NIH Publication No. 01-3670; 2001 May. Available: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3xsum.pdf (accessed 2005 Nov 15).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    Very-low-calorie diets present a number of medical risks but offer rapid weight loss.

    “Overall, very-low-calorie diets present a number of medical risks but offer rapid weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [71] 71. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Obesity Statement. AACE/ACE position statement on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obe- sity. Endocr Pract 1998;297-330.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [72] 72. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Very low-calorie diets. JAMA 1993;270:967-74.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8] 8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The evidence report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083; 1998 September.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [74] 74. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, et al. Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:579-84. source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says very-low-energy diets combined with behavior modification enable substantial initial weight loss, typically 20–25 kg; the Results also report significantly greater initial loss than with balanced diets. Our copy does not substantiate the claim that these diets present a number of medical risks. A reference title mentions benefits and risks, but gives no findings about those risks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    High-protein diets affect renal function and can place greater demands on the kidney and liver for metabolizing and excreting excess urea and ammonia.

    “High-protein diets affect renal function and can place greater demands on the kidney and liver for metabolizing and excreting excess urea and ammonia.47”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] 47. St. Jeor ST, Howard BV, Prewitt E, et al.; AHA Nutrition Committee. AHA Science advisory. Dietary protein and weight reduction. A statement for healthcare profes- sionals from the nutrition committee of the Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001;104:1869-74. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Evidence

    Low-carbohydrate diets are usually low in fruits and vegetables, dairy products and whole grains; these dietary patterns, if maintained over the long term, are associated with an increased risk of a variety of chronic diseases, including hypertension and cancer.

    “Overall, low-carbohydrate diets are usually low in fruits and vegetables, dairy products and whole grains; these dietary patterns, if maintained over the long term, are associated with an increased risk of a variety of chronic diseases, including hypertension and cancer.12,16,68”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutrition committee of the Ameri- can Heart Association. Circulation 2000;102:2284-99. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] 16. Miller ER, Erlinger TP, Young DR, et al. Results of the Diet, Exercise, and Weight Loss Intervention Trial (DEW-IT). Hypertension 2002;40:612-8. source
    • cites [68] 68. Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM. ACS/ADA/AHA Scientific Statement. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. A common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Asso- ciation. Circulation 2004;109:3244-55. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Evidence

    High-protein diets may be a health hazard for patients with renal or liver impaired functions in general, and for patients with diabetes in particular.

    “They may be a health hazard for patients with renal or liver impaired functions in general, and for patients with diabetes in particular.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] 47. St. Jeor ST, Howard BV, Prewitt E, et al.; AHA Nutrition Committee. AHA Science advisory. Dietary protein and weight reduction. A statement for healthcare profes- sionals from the nutrition committee of the Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001;104:1869-74. source

      The “High-Protein Diets and Weight Reduction” section says a very-high-protein diet is especially risky for patients with diabetes because it can accelerate diabetic renal disease. It does not specifically say that patients with pre-existing renal or liver impairment are at risk, so that part of the claim is not established by the passages found. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-fat diets decrease total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and have variable effects on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

    “Decreases in total cholesterol and lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol levels and variable effects on triglyceride and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol levels 14,77,78”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 1):1S-40S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [77] 77. Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, et al. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA 1998;280:2001-7. source
    • cites [78] 78. Lichtenstein AH, Van Horn L, for the AHA Nutrition Committee. AHA Science ad- visory. Very low fat diets. A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutri- tion committee of the Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;98:935-9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Higher triglyceride levels are usually associated with lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles that are more susceptible to oxidation; this metabolic profile is atherogenic.

    “Higher triglyceride levels are usually associated with lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles that are more susceptible to oxidation; this metabolic profile is atherogenic.[33][34][35]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33][34][35]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Low-calorie diets

    High-fibre and low-glycemic-index diets are associated with increased satiety, lower postprandial glycemic response and lower insulin levels.

    “High-fibre and low-glycemic-index diets are associated with increased satiety, lower postprandial glycemic response and lower insulin levels.[17][18][19][20]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17][18][19][20]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Overall, drop-out rates ranged from 20% to 40%, with fewer people using the low-carbohydrate diet dropping out than those using the low-calorie diet.

    “Overall, drop-out rates ranged from 20% to 40%, with fewer people using the low-carbohydrate diet dropping out than those using the low-calorie diet.[58][59][60][61]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58][59][60][61]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    NCEP Step I and II diets reduce circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 12% and 16% respectively.

    “The NCEP Step I and II diets have been extensively studied and found to reduce circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 12% and 16% respectively.15”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Yu-Poth S, Zhao G, Etherton T, et al. Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular dis- ease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:632-46. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Low-carbohydrate diets

    Mild ketosis decreases appetite, and the high protein content of a low-carbohydrate diet increases satiety and activates thermogenesis.

    “Mild ketosis decreases appetite, and the diet's high protein content increases satiety and activates thermogenesis.[54][55][56]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54][55][56]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Postprandial thermogenesis is doubled on high-protein diets and contributes an additional loss of about 378 kJ per day.

    “Postprandial thermogenesis is doubled on high-protein diets and contributes an additional loss of about 378 kJ per day.56”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] 56. Johnston CS, Day CS, Swan PD. Postprandial thermogenesis is increased 100% on a high-protein, low-fat diet versus a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet in healthy, young women. J Am Coll Nutr 2002;21:55-61. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Behaviour therapy in conjunction with dietary interventions (including low-calorie diets) results in additional weight loss in the short term (1 year) but not in the long term (3-5 years).

    “Behaviour therapy in conjunction with dietary interventions (including low-calorie diets) has been shown to result in additional weight loss in the short term (1 year) but not in the long term (3-5 years) (evidence category B). 8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The evidence report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083; 1998 September.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Evidence

    Both low-calorie and low-carbohydrate diets result in weight loss.

    “Both the low-calorie and low-carbohydrate diets result in weight loss.[58][59][60][61]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58][59][60][61]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Low-calorie diets

    Low-calorie diets are generally high in carbohydrates (55%-60% of total daily energy intake), low in fat (<30% of energy intake), and energy-reduced (deficit of 2100-4200 kJ/d).

    “In general, low-calorie diets are high in carbohydrates (55%-60% of total daily energy intake), low in fat (< 30% of energy intake), and energy-reduced (deficit of 2100-4200 kJ/d: minimum of 4200-5040 kJ/d for women and 5040-5880 kJ/d for men).14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 1):1S-40S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    In Stern and associates, weight change at one year was -5.1 kg on a low-carbohydrate diet and -3.1 kg on a low-calorie diet (p > 0.05).

    “Similarly, in a study by Stern and associates, 59 weight change at one year was -5.1 (SD 8.7) kg on a low-carbohydrate diet and -3.1 (SD 8.4) kg on a low-calorie diet (p > 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] 59. Stern L, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conven- tional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a random- ized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:778-85. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Foster and associates reported a weight change of -7.0 kg at 6 months on the low-carbohydrate diet compared with -3.2 kg on the low-calorie diet (p = 0.02), but no significant difference at 12 months (-4.4 kg vs -2.5 kg, p = 0.26).

    “Foster and associates 61 reported a weight change of -7.0 (SD 6.5) kg at 6 months on the low-carbohydrate diet compared with -3.2 (SD 5.6) kg on the low-calorie diet (p = 0.02), but no significant difference was observed at 12 months (-4.4 [SD 6.7] kg with a low-carbohydrate diet v. -2.5 [SD 6.3] kg with a low-calorie diet, p = 0.26).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] 61. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082-90. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Both Brehm and Yancy reported that weight loss resulted mainly from decreases in fat mass.

    “Both Brehm and associates and Yancy and associates reported that weight loss resulted mainly from decreases in fat mass.58,60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [58] 58. Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels S, et al. A randomized trial comparing a very low car- bohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascu- lar risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1617-23. source
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Low-fat diets without intentional restriction of energy intake result in greater weight loss (3.2 kg, 95% CI 1.9-4.5 kg, p < 0.001) than habitual or medium-fat diets ad libitum.

    “They reported that low-fat diets without intentional restriction of energy intake resulted in greater weight loss (3.2 kg, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.5 kg, p < 0.001) than did habitual, or medium-fat, diets ad libitum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Astrup A, Grunwald GK, Melanson EL, et al. The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1545-52.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Low-carbohydrate diets

    Free fatty acids are mobilized from adipose tissue on a low-carbohydrate diet, resulting in ketone body formation.

    “Free fatty acids are also mobilized from adipose tissue, which results in ketone body formation.51”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] 51. Westman EC. A review of very low carbohydrate diets for weight loss. J Clin Out- comes Manage 1999;6:36-40.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Weight loss from low-fat diets without intentional energy restriction is more substantial in heavier subjects.

    “Weight loss was more substantial in heavier subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Astrup A, Grunwald GK, Melanson EL, et al. The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1545-52.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Low-carbohydrate diets

    The body depletes its glycogen stores and induces gluconeogenesis, whereby lean tissue is used to produce glucose as an energy source for the brain, on a very low-carbohydrate diet.

    “The body depletes its glycogen stores, and gluconeogenesis is induced, whereby lean tissue is used to produce glucose as an energy source for the brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] 51. Westman EC. A review of very low carbohydrate diets for weight loss. J Clin Out- comes Manage 1999;6:36-40.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    In Yancy and associates, mean change in body weight was -12.9% on the low-carbohydrate diet and -6.7% on the low-calorie diet (p < 0.001).

    “Similarly, in a study by Yancy and associates, 60 the mean change in body weight was -12.9% on the low-carbohydrate diet and -6.7% on the lowcalorie diet (p < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    In Yancy and associates, body water loss was greater on the low-carbohydrate diet than on the low-calorie diet during the first 2 weeks but was similar in both diet groups after 2 weeks.

    “For loss in body water, Yancy and associates reported that body water loss was greater on the lowcarbohydrate diet than on the low-calorie diet during the first 2 weeks of the study but was similar in both diet groups after 2 weeks.60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    Sudden deaths resulting from very-low-calorie diets in the 1970s were attributed to the poor quality of dietary protein; an inadequate supply of electrolytes, vitamins and minerals; and extended use without adequate medical supervision.

    “Sudden deaths resulting from very-lowcalorie diets in the 1970s were attributed to the poor quality of dietary protein; an inadequate supply of electrolytes, vitamins and minerals; and extended use without adequate medical supervision.73,75”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [75] 75. Dwyer JT, Melanson KJ. Dietary treatment of obesity. 2002 Sept 24. Ch. 18 of Obe- sity, ed. JF Caro. Endotext.com. Available: www.endotext.org/obesity/obesity18/ obesity18.htm (accessed 2005 Nov 16).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    Overall, very-low-calorie diets present a number of medical risks but offer rapid weight loss.

    “Overall, very-low-calorie diets present a number of medical risks but offer rapid weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    In one study, increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of more than 10% were seen in 30% of subjects in the low-carbohydrate diet group and only 16% in the low-calorie diet group, and 2 participants using the low-carbohydrate diet were withdrawn because of important adverse effects on blood lipid levels.

    “In one study, 60 increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of more than 10% were seen in 30% of subjects in the lowcarbohydrate diet group and only 16% in the low-calorie diet group, and 2 participants using the low-carbohydrate diet were withdrawn from the trial because of important adverse effects on blood lipid levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Evidence

    Decreases in leptin levels in a negative energy balance stimulate food intake and energy storage to restore homeostasis, which may hamper weight-loss maintenance.

    “This may hamper weight-loss maintenance, since decreases in leptin levels in a negative energy balance stimulate food intake and energy storage to restore homeostasis.[64][65][66]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64][65][66]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-fat diets were originally designed to prevent or reverse heart disease.

    “Many of the very-low-fat diets, which contain about 10%-15% total fat, were originally designed to prevent or reverse heart disease.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 1):1S-40S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    In Golay and associates, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were decreased in the low-carbohydrate diet group (p < 0.01) and, to a lesser extent and less consistently, in the high-carbohydrate diet group, although weight losses were similar (-8.3% vs -7.4%).

    “They found that fasting plasma glucose, insulin, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were decreased in the lowcarbohydrate diet group (p < 0.01) and, to a lesser extent and less consistently, in the high-carbohydrate diet group, although weight losses were similar (-8.3% [SD 0.5%] v. -7.4% [SD 0.6%]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] 31. Golay A, Allaz A-F, Morel Y, et al. Similar weight loss with low-or high-carbohy- drate diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:174-8.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    In the Lifestyle Heart Trial, coronary atherosclerosis regressed in the intervention group (relative improvement of 4.5% at year 1 and 7.9% at year 5) while it continued to progress (relative worsening of 5.4% at year 1 and 27.7% at year 5) in the group receiving usual care (p < 0.05 between groups).

    “Coronary atherosclerosis regressed in the intervention group (relative improvement of 4.5% at year 1 and 7.9% at year 5) while it continued to progress (relative worsening of 5.4% at year 1 and 27.7% at year 5) in the group receiving usual care (p < 0.05 between groups).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77] 77. Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, et al. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA 1998;280:2001-7. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    Very-low-calorie diets result in an average weekly weight loss of 1.5-2.5 kg, compared with 0.4-0.5 kg with low-calorie diets.

    “Verylow-calorie diets result in an average weekly weight loss of 1.5-2.5 kg, compared with 0.4-0.5 kg with low-calorie diets.72”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] 72. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Very low-calorie diets. JAMA 1993;270:967-74.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-fat diets contain about 10%-15% total fat.

    “Many of the very-low-fat diets, which contain about 10%-15% total fat, were originally designed to prevent or reverse heart disease.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 1):1S-40S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Evidence

    Even if patients select monounsaturated fatty acids as their principal fat source, the low-carbohydrate strategy does not restrict saturated-fat intake and is low in fruits, vegetables and dairy products, factors associated with increased risk of chronic diseases.

    “Even if patients select monounsaturated fatty acids as their principal fat source, as with Mediterranean diets, the low-carbohydrate strategy does not restrict saturated-fat intake and is low in fruits, vegetables and dairy products, factors associated with increased risk of chronic diseases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Evidence

    Although low-carbohydrate diets may not pose a serious health threat to a metabolically healthy obese patient in the short term, they may put people at risk of chronic diseases.

    “Although low-carbohydrate diets may not pose a serious health threat to a metabolically healthy obese patient in the short term, they may put people at risk of chronic diseases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    The differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol between low-carbohydrate and low-calorie diets disappeared at the 1-year testing (0.5% vs -5.8% change, p = 0.47), a result also observed in other randomized trials.

    “However, these differences disappeared at the 1-year testing (0.5% [SD 21.2%] v. -5.8% [SD 16.1%] change, p = 0.47), a result that was also observed in the other randomized trials.[58][59][60][61]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58][59][60][61]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-calorie diets

    The average weight loss at 12-16 weeks on very-low-calorie diets is about 20 kg, compared with 8 kg on low-calorie diets.

    “The average weight loss at 12-16 weeks on very-lowcalorie diets is about 20 kg, compared with 8 kg on lowcalorie diets.8,72”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The evidence report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083; 1998 September.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [72] 72. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Very low-calorie diets. JAMA 1993;270:967-74.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Evidence

    Foster and associates reported that triglyceride levels decreased by -28.1% on the low-carbohydrate diet and increased by 1.4% on the low-calorie diet at the 1-year follow-up.

    “Foster and associates 61 reported that triglyceride levels had decreased by -28.1% (SD 23.6%) on the low-carbohydrate diet and increased by 1.4% (SD 52.5%) on the low-calorie diet at the 1-year follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] 61. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082-90. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-calorie diets can cause serious adverse effects including gout, cholelithiasis, excessive loss of lean body mass, acute psychosis, cardiac disturbances and sudden death.

    “Gout, cholelithiasis, excessive loss of lean body mass, acute psychosis, cardiac disturbances and sudden death [71][72][73]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] 71. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Obesity Statement. AACE/ACE position statement on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obe- sity. Endocr Pract 1998;297-330.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [72] 72. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Very low-calorie diets. JAMA 1993;270:967-74.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diet characteristics and sustainability

    The dietary pattern generally shared among National Weight Control Registry participants included low amounts of fat (about 24% of the total daily energy intake), high amounts of carbohydrate, and a low energy intake (5460-6300 kJ/d).

    “The dietary pattern generally shared among participants included low amounts of fat (about 24% of the total daily energy intake), high amounts of carbohydrate, and a low energy intake (5460-6300 kJ/d).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] 81. Hill J, Wing R. The National Weight Control Registry. Available: http://xnet .kp.org/permanentejournal/sum03/registry.pdf (accessed 2005 Nov 16).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Low-carbohydrate diets have reports of a small number of cardiac events.

    “Reports of a small number of cardiac events 59,60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [59] 59. Stern L, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conven- tional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a random- ized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:778-85. source
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diet characteristics and sustainability

    Most National Weight Control Registry participants eat breakfast daily, self-monitor weight and are physically active.

    “Most eat breakfast daily, self-monitor weight and are physically active.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] 81. Hill J, Wing R. The National Weight Control Registry. Available: http://xnet .kp.org/permanentejournal/sum03/registry.pdf (accessed 2005 Nov 16).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Diet characteristics and sustainability

    There is still no definitive answer as to which diets sustain long-term weight loss.

    “We still have no definitive answer as to which diets sustain long-term weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-calorie diets decrease total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels.

    “Decreases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels 71,73”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [71] 71. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Obesity Statement. AACE/ACE position statement on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obe- sity. Endocr Pract 1998;297-330.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Very-low-calorie diets cause side effects including dry mouth, constipation, headache, dizziness or orthostatic hypotension, fatigue, cold intolerance, dry skin, menstrual irregularities, and hair loss.

    “Dry mouth, constipation, headache, dizziness or orthostatic hypotension, fatigue, cold intolerance, dry skin, menstrual irregularities, hair loss 73”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] 73. Saris WHM. Very-low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9 (Suppl 4):295S-301S.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Long-term effects of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risks have not been assessed.

    “Long-term effects on CV risks not assessed”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Diet characteristics and sustainability

    Over 4000 people are in the National Weight Control Registry.

    “Over 4000 people are in the registry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] 81. Hill J, Wing R. The National Weight Control Registry. Available: http://xnet .kp.org/permanentejournal/sum03/registry.pdf (accessed 2005 Nov 16).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Diet characteristics and sustainability

    Weight loss is associated with a lower resting metabolic rate and decreased energy requirements.

    “The energy content of weight-loss maintenance diets should take into account the lower resting metabolic rate and decreased energy requirements due to body mass loss during weight loss.79,80”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [79] 79. Wyatt HR, Grunwald GK, Seagle HM, et al. Resting energy expenditure in reduced- obese subjects in the National Weight Control Registry. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69: 1189-93. source
    • cites [80] 80. Weinsier RL, Nagy TR, Hunter GR, et al. Do adaptive changes in metabolic rate fa- vor weight regain in weight-reduced individuals? An examination of the set-point theory. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:1088-94. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Low-carbohydrate diets decrease triglyceride levels and have variable effects on total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein levels, and high-density lipoprotein levels.

    “Decreases in triglyceride levels; variable effects on total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels [58][59][60][61] and highdensity lipoprotein levels 59”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [58] 58. Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels S, et al. A randomized trial comparing a very low car- bohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascu- lar risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1617-23. source
    • cites [59] 59. Stern L, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conven- tional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a random- ized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:778-85. source
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
    • cites [61] 61. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082-90. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Very-low-fat diets

    Low-carbohydrate diets cause side effects including constipation, headache, halitosis, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness, and rash.

    “Constipation, headache, halitosis, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness, rash 60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] 60. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. source
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low-calorie diets are the closest to most people's general eating patterns and present the fewest risks for the patient.

    “Low-calorie diets are the closest to most people's general eating patterns and present the fewest risks for the patient.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low-carbohydrate diets are not suitable if kidney or liver function is impaired.

    “Not suitable if kidney or liver function is impaired”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Very-low-calorie diet range exceeds its stated cutoff

    Minor

    The text defines very-low-calorie diets as providing less than 3360 kJ per day, but the table gives a range extending to 3500 kJ per day.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Wing RR, Hill JO. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr 2001;21: 323-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strychar, I.
Affiliations
Hôpital Notre-Dame (CA)
Corresponding author
Strychar, I.
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2006-01-03
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
56-63
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2144101638
Cited by
129
References
99
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Université de Montréal
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Institute of Gender and Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
obesity, weight loss, weight loss maintenance, hypocaloric diet, very low calorie diet, carbohydrate restriction, dietary fat restriction, saturated fat, atherogenic effects, dietary intervention, obesity treatment
MeSH terms
Diet, Reducing, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Obesity, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review