Cited by 129Smoking Behavior and CessationAir Quality and Health ImpactsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Association of anti-smoking legislation with rates of hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions

Open access
Naiman, A., Glazier, R. H., Moineddin, R.·2010·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the impact of anti-smoking legislation on respiratory or cardiovascular conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. We studied rates of hospital admission attributable to three cardiovascular conditions (acute myocardial infarction, angina, and stroke) and three respiratory conditions (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia or bronchitis) after the implementation of smoking bans. METHODS: We calculated crude rates of admission to hospital in Toronto, Ontario, from January 1996 (three years before the first phase of a smoking ban was implemented) to March 2006 (two years after the last phase was implemented. We used an autoregressive integrated moving-average (ARIMA) model to test for a relation between smoking bans and admission rates. We compared our results with similar data from two Ontario municipalities that did not have smoking bans and with conditions (acute cholecystitis, bowel obstruction and appendicitis) that are not known to be related to second-hand smoke. RESULTS: Crude rates of admission to hospital because of cardiovascular conditions decreased by 39% (95% CI 38%-40%) and admissions because of respiratory conditions decreased by 33% (95% CI 32%-34%) during the ban period affecting restaurant settings. No consistent reductions in these rates were evident after smoking bans affecting other settings. No significant reductions were observed in control cities or for control conditions. INTERPRETATION: Our results serve to expand the list of health outcomes that may be ameliorated by smoking bans. Further research is needed to establish the types of settings in which smoking bans are most effective. Our results lend legitimacy to efforts to further reduce public exposure to tobacco smoke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.091130

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F, et al. Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2468-72. Correspondence to: Dr. Alisa Naiman, 491 Lawrence Ave. W., Ste. 101, Toronto ON M5M 1C9; a.naiman@utoronto.ca

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naiman, A., Glazier, R. H., & Moineddin, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
182
Issue
8
Pages
761-767
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2103760950
Cited by
129
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
smoking bans, anti-smoking legislation, passive smoking, hospitalization, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, bronchitis, public health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Lung Diseases, Male, Ontario, Patient Admission, Smoking, Social Control, Formal, Tobacco Smoke Pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review